{"id":22388,"date":"2020-04-18T21:10:45","date_gmt":"2020-04-19T04:10:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/?p=22388"},"modified":"2020-04-19T01:18:44","modified_gmt":"2020-04-19T08:18:44","slug":"spotting-10-logical-fallacies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/spotting-10-logical-fallacies\/","title":{"rendered":"Spotting 10 Logical Fallacies"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nA logical fallacy is an error in reasoning or a false assumption that might sound impressive but proves absolutely nothing. Sometimes they are completely unintentional, but more often than not, they are used by people during debates, arguments or presentations to mislead you into thinking, acting or behaving in a certain way.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nAs you might expect, salespeople, politicians and con artists use them all the time often very skillfully, and the public innocently continues to fall for them.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nSo, knowing how to spot a logical fallacy and call it out or refute it can be an incredibly useful life tool to have at your disposal.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nUnsurprisingly there are a lot of logical fallacies, hundreds, in fact, so to learn them all is a big task. But to help you on your way here are the 10 most common ones for you to get your head around and start your learning journey.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n1. The Ad Hominem<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nLet\u2019s start with probably one of the most common offenders. Also called \u2018poisoning the well\u2019 or the \u2018personal attack\u2019 you will have, I am certain, seen the ad hominem fallacy used all the time.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nHow it works is that rather than refuting an opponent\u2019s argument the person attacks the individual instead. This can be directed toward their character, morals, intelligence, reputation or credentials. In fact, it really doesn\u2019t matter, the main thing to remember is that they are not addressing the actual argument being presented but relying purely on feelings and prejudices to win their case.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nHere are some typical examples: \u201cHe is so evil you cannot trust a word he says about ______ \u201d or \u201dOf course you would say that because you support ________” (Incidentally, going forward, fill in all gaps any way you like!).\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nP.S. There is also a variation to the Ad Hominem called \u2018Guilt by Association\u2019 that you also need to watch out for and the clue to how is in its title!\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n2. The Appeal to Authority<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThis is another much loved and of course widely used and abused fallacy.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nIt works by stating that whatever is claimed is true because a \u2018so-called\u2019 authority said so rather than applying any logical reasoning providing any evidence to support the claim.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nFor example: \u201cRaising interest rates by 3% MUST be in the best interests of the economy because the PM said so yesterday on the 9 o’clock news\u201d.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n3. The Straw Man<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nWith this fallacy, you argue against a phony, weak or ridiculous position that you have created, and then proceed to easily knock it down.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nFor example: \u201cTree-hugging environmentalists are so dumb they think plants have feelings and are more important than humans\u201d.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nBasically every time you see one of those ever so funny comedy skits on Gootube ridiculing someone because they are (please take your pick here) vegan, meat eaters, millennials, GenX, silver surfers, gun owners, pacizsts, spiritual, non-spiritual, love tech, hate tech etc, you know how their little ruse works<\/strong> and what it\u2019s called! [BTW, this argument is, in itself, a variant of the ad hominem attack.]\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n4. The Appeal To Ignorance<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThis fallacy works by using the premise that since we do not know (or cannot prove) something that it must be either true or false. Which, if you think about, is completely ridiculous as not knowing something isn\u2019t proof of anything, well, other than you don\u2019t know something.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nHere are some simple examples:\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\u2018We have no hard evidence that fairies exist. Which must mean they are so incredibly magical that they can make themselves completely invisible to humans\u2019.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nOr sometimes you might even see some \u2018appeal to ignorance\u2019 nonsense dressed up like this as a serious product endorsement:\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\u2018This supplement is totally amazing because no one who has taken it so far has become sick!\u2019\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n5. The False Dilemma<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThis is also sometimes known as the False Dichotomy, the Black and White Fallacy, or even the Bi-Furcation Fallacy. This is how it works:\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nEssentially you reduce an argument down to only two options despite the fact that there may be many more<\/strong> (and far better possibilities) to choose from e.g: \u2018You\u2019re either with us or against us\u2019 (note #1: This sucker even helped start a horrific war!)\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nor\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\u2018You either love me or you hate me\u2019 (note #2: Hang on a minute, what about words such as; \u2018like\u2019, \u2018fancy\u2019, \u2018adore\u2019 or \u2018respect\u2019 \u2013 or the multitude of other hundreds of attitudes, opinions and emotions you can have about another person???).\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n6. The Slippery Slope, AKA: Domino Theory<\/strong>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThis fallacy works by taking an argument from a sensible moderate place and moving it to an extreme place [reducto ad absurdum?] via a one thing leads to another kind of route regardless of any logic or rational evidence to support the claim.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nOf course, like most fallacies, you will see it played out everywhere, but it is an extremely common occurrence in houses with strapping teenagers who have sensible, concerned parents. Typically the arguments go something like; \u201cYou simply must let me go to the psychedelic Goa trance music festival this weekend, if I don\u2019t go my friends will think I am totally square and a complete loser, they will then dump me and I will end up with no life whatsoever, and be forced to spend the rest of my life living as a sad recluse with no job, no money, no job, no love life, no social life, and absolutely no future\u2026\u201d.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n7. The Circular Argument (Petitio Principii or ‘Begging the Question’)<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nAs well as the Circular Argument, Petitio Principii and Begging the Question it also has a fourth name which is; The Vicious Circle. It is\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\ncalled this for a very good reason because it works by repeating what has just been said which, hey presto, creates a completely closed loop, AKA: a circle!\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nHere are some basic examples:\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\u2018Everyone wants to go see the new Star Wars movie because it is the hottest film going at the moment\u2019,\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nor\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\u2018Psychic powers exist because I have witnessed what can only be described as extraordinary psychic power\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n(Note #3: This fallacy gained fame when it featured in the plot of a really good book called Catch 22. In it the protagonist claims he is mad in order to avoid fying dangerous bombing missions. However, he finds his claim rejected on the grounds that by claiming he is insane it actually proves he must be sane \u2013 as only a sane man would try and claim he was mad to avoid flying the deadly missions!).\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n8. The Alphabet Soup<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThis is the overuse of acronyms, abbreviations and occulted language to bamboozle people into thinking that they know what they are talking about and therefore must be right (and you are wrong and ignorant to boot). Sad to say the well-being industry is rife with this sort of hogwash often used to impress and confuse poor saps into taking a dubious course of treatment often at great expense to their body and wallet.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nExample: \u201cIt is very often the case that someone suffering from DSW2 deficiency in their lymphatic C5X chromosome system will also show a 6% increase in IOK17 regression marked with a surge in B523C plasma filament growth. The obvious solution is a course of XbandPharm FSX17 meds twice daily and 6 XbandPharma HFD tablets every three days in the morning with a glass of water.\u201d\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n9. The Bandwagon<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThe bandwagon fallacy works on the basis that something is correct, good, true, right or whatever the heck you want it to be just because most people think it is as well. Named after the horse-drawn cart that politicians used to travel around on shouting their dubious election promises and drawing attention to themselves so that people would give them their support and vote for them. If you were dumb enough be one of them, you could literally jump on the bandwagon and enjoy being taken for a ride!\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nAnyway, no surprises here but it is a completely fallacious argument. Just because lots of people might all agree with each other about something or another it doesn\u2019t mean for one second they are all correct.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nFor example; \u2018One billion people drink diet _____ every year so it must be the best soft drink in the world\u2019.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n10. The Red Herring<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nYou may well have heard of this one. It\u2019s pretty famous after all!\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nBut you may not recognise it in real life as we mostly hear it mentioned in whodunnit TV crime shows.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nSo how does it work? Well, the red herring is a clever irrelevant argument that distracts you from the real topic being scrutinized.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nApparently named after the smelly fish used when training hunting dogs, it is most frequently employed by crafty individuals who lead the conversation (read; argument) away from an area that they are vulnerable into one that they feel is a safer territory.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nAs you might well imagine \u2018guilty\u2019 politicians absolutely love the red herring and will use it in almost every answer that they can possibly get away with e.g. ‘Why are we raising taxes? Well…hmm…we need to raise taxes to generate more revenue to support the existing commitments to primary school education. After all, children represent the future of the nation, don’t they? So we must always support them 100%. Don’t you agree?’\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n11. Political Correctness (special bonus fallacy)<\/strong>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nLastly, and as bit of a special added bonus the \u2018PC argument\u2019 (aka Language Control).\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nWe are all for equality and fairness, but please bear with us on this one. This post-modern day piece of fallacious sophistry used to have another name. Ironically it was once simply known as the Name Calling Fallacy.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nHow it works is you change the nature of something by giving it another name. You must have seen the sort of thing on the news or in the papers all the time.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nPeople are no longer \u2018poor\u2019 but \u2018economically disadvantaged\u2019, they are not \u2018broke\u2019 but \u2018have a temporary negative cash \u2002flow situation\u2019 and, of course, they no longer live in \u2018slums\u2019 but in \u2018economically depressed urban environments\u2019.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nNaturally, the world of commerce and industry are masters of it just as much as governments are.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nHave you noticed how \u2018bad debt\u2019 is now \u2018an underperforming asset\u2019 and that organizations love giving employees \u2018up titles\u2019 instead of raises\u2019?\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThere is also another way that PC logic (often the total opposite of factual correctness) can be used very effectively. Rather than simply naming things, words can also be weaponized by turning them into \u2018control words\u2019 which can be employed effectively especially via name calling strategies.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nThese are typically used to shut down debates, inhibit critical thinking and corral the target down carefully constructed mental pathways (safely away from the issue being discussed).\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nOf course, as mentioned at the start, there are literally hundreds of other logical fallacies such as the Hasty Generalization, Fallacy of Sunk Costs, False Analogy, Ad-hoc Reasoning and even the Fallacy Fallacy to name just a few more.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\nWhat are your thoughts on the ones presented here? Have you been caught out by a \u2018logical fallacy\u2019 lately? Perhaps you have a \u2018favorite’ fallacy you would like to share? Let us know in the comments.\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n15 Logical Fallacies You Should Know Before Getting Into a Debate\n\n\n\nhttps:\/\/thebestschools.org\/magazine\/15-logical-fallacies-know\/<\/a>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning or a false assumption that might sound impressive but proves absolutely nothing. Sometimes they are completely unintentional, but more often than not, they are used by people during debates, arguments or presentations … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22388"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22388\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22410,"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22388\/revisions\/22410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}