{"id":4513,"date":"2011-11-21T19:44:48","date_gmt":"2011-11-22T02:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/?p=4513"},"modified":"2011-12-12T12:14:53","modified_gmt":"2011-12-12T19:14:53","slug":"thurston-narcotics-detective-mancillas-arrested-for-dv-unlawful-imprisonment-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/thurston-narcotics-detective-mancillas-arrested-for-dv-unlawful-imprisonment-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Thurston Narcotics Detective Arrested for DV, Imprisonment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Thurston County’s DV industry has begun eating its children:<\/strong> The Daily Olympian wouldn’t report Ruben S. Mancillas’ name as the Thurston Sheriff’s narcotics detective arrested for DV and unlawful imprisonment because (they claimed) he hadn’t actually been charged yet. \u00a0The paper didn’t mention a special setting before judge McPhee (normally Sutton & Tabor currently preside over the Superior Court criminal calendars) where, after setting a $10,000 bail, the judge warned the newspaper not to photograph Mancillas because it might interfere with his undercover work. <\/strong>Prior Restraint?…maybe:<\/p>\n

Early 30’s (dob: 11-7-77), Hispanic, married, member of the SWAT team, and now facing a class C felony in the DV judicial-courthouse industrial complex dominated by stalwarts such as Jennifer Lord, esq. & Co.<\/p>\n

Scene of the ‘crime’?–3361 Bali St, NE, Olympia, WA.<\/a>\u00a0(map & photo)<\/p>\n

Thurston County Sheriff’s Narcotics Detective Out on Bail<\/a>\u00a0by\u00a0JEREMY PAWLOSKI | Staff writer\u00a0\u2022 Published November 16, 2011<\/strong><\/p>\n

The contrast between how this case (#11-1-01784-6) is being handled and the matter of Thurston’s DV Prosecutor, Jennifer Lord charging a Good Samaritan for accommodating a disabled woman in the public hallway of the Thurston Family & Juvenile Courthouse (#11-1-01711-1) \u00a0is stunning. \u00a0Every effort is being made to hide the identity of the detective facing serious criminal charges while the Samaritan is being pilloried for simply rendering aid and assistance in a public space.<\/p>\n

Of course, Mr. Mancillas may be entirely innocent and exonerated. No arraignment has been set to date. But while Mr. James Dixon, his attorney, has already filed a motion for discovery, the Samaritan waits for his and is told he may not even have a copy under CrR 4.7. \u00a0Motions are filed for Mancillas BEFORE arraignment while the Samaritan is told by Krystal Rowland (judicial assistant to judges Tabor & Sutton) that he cannot file motions prior to being arraigned…apparently that limitation doesn’t apply in the Mancillas case.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Early Rehab Tools<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Intergalactic Laxative<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a>

50 Ways To Leave Your Lover<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Stairway to Heaven<\/p><\/div>\n

In order to clarify the dramatic differences between how outsiders and pro se defendants are handled compared to one of their own with a local attorney (James Dixon), the opening details of the Mancillas case and ongoing ones for the Samaritan will be published right here:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Behind the Green Door<\/p><\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Taking The Fall<\/p><\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Thurston\u00a0Superior \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0State of Washington vs. Ruben S. Mancillas
\nCase Number:<\/strong>\u00a011-1-01784-6<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sub<\/td>\nDocket Date<\/td>\nDocket Code<\/td>\nDocket Description<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
1<\/span><\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/span><\/td>\nPRELIMINARY APPEARANCE
\nJDG0004<\/span><\/td>\n		Preliminary Appearance
\nJudge William Thomas Mcphee<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
2<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nAFFIDAVIT\/DECLARATION PROB CAUSE<\/td>\nAffidavit\/declaration Prob Cause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
3.99<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nCONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FORM<\/td>\nConfidential Information Form<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
–<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nCONFIDNTL REPORT IN SEALED ENVELOPE<\/td>\nConfidntl Report In Sealed Envelope<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
4<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nPRE-TRIAL REPORT<\/td>\nPre-trial Report<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
5<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nORD\u00a0DETERMIN PROBABLE CAUSE<\/td>\nOrd Determin Probable Cause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
6<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nDECLARATION<\/td>\nDeclaration On Nonsurrender<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
7<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nORDER TO SURRENDER WEAPON<\/td>\nOrder To Surrender Weapon<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
8<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nNO CONTACT ORDER<\/td>\nNo Contact Order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
9<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nORDER ESTABLISHING COND. OF RELEASE<\/td>\nOrder Establishing Cond. Of Release<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
10<\/td>\n11-16-2011<\/td>\nNOT OF APPEAR AND REQ FOR DISCOVERY<\/td>\nNot Of Appear And Req For Discovery<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
11<\/td>\n11-17-2011<\/td>\nBAIL BOND<\/td>\nBail Bond Nw Surety<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
12<\/td>\n11-17-2011<\/td>\nSHERIFF’S OFFICE RECEIPT<\/td>\nSheriff’s Office Receipt<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

You may notice how the details, and of public interest, are SEALED in the Mancillas case. But not so in #11-1-01711-1. THAT case is open to all without any sealed reports, etc.<\/p>\n

Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Thurston Superior \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0State of Washington v. Good Samaritan
\nCase Number:<\/strong>\u00a011-1-01711-1 (brought to you courtesy of DV prosecutor, Jennifer Lord)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sub<\/td>\nDocket Date<\/td>\nDocket Code<\/td>\nDocket Description<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
1<\/td>\n11-01-2011<\/td>\nINFORMATION<\/td>\nInformation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
2<\/td>\n11-01-2011<\/td>\nAFFIDAVIT\/DECLARATION PROB CAUSE<\/td>\nAffidavit\/declaration Prob Cause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
3<\/td>\n11-01-2011<\/td>\nORD DETERMIN PROBABLE CAUSE<\/td>\nOrd Determin Probable Cause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
–<\/td>\n11-01-2011<\/td>\nEX-PARTE ACTION WITH ORDER<\/td>\nEx-parte Action With Order<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
4<\/td>\n11-01-2011<\/td>\nSUMMONS<\/td>\nSummons<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
5<\/td>\n11-01-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF ARRAIGNMENT
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Notice Of Arraignment
\nArraignment\/appt Of Atty<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
6<\/td>\n11-02-2011<\/td>\nAPPEARANCE PRO SE<\/td>\nAppearance Pro Se<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
7<\/td>\n11-02-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF HEARING
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Notice Of Hearing
\nMotion To Recuse\/change Venue<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
8<\/td>\n11-02-2011<\/td>\nMOTION<\/td>\nMotion Change Venue<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
–<\/td>\n11-02-2011<\/td>\nAFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE<\/td>\nAffidavit Of Prejudice Tabor<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
9<\/td>\n11-03-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF HEARING
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Notice Of Hearing
\nBill Of Particulars<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
10<\/td>\n11-03-2011<\/td>\nMOTION<\/td>\nMotion For Bill Of Particulars<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
11<\/td>\n11-03-2011<\/td>\nATTACHMENT<\/td>\nAttachments To Motion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
12<\/td>\n11-07-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF HEARING<\/td>\nNotice Of Hearing Incorrect Set<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
13<\/td>\n11-07-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF HEARING<\/td>\nNotice Of Hearing Not Timely<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
14<\/td>\n11-07-2011<\/td>\nMOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION<\/td>\nMotion For Reconsideration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
15<\/td>\n11-10-2011<\/td>\nHEARING CONTINUED:CALENDAR CONFLICT
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Hearing Continued:calendar Conflict
\nMotion To Recuse-1\/chg Of Venue-1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nACTION<\/td>\nBill Of Particulars-1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nTabor Cc Scott Cr Shackell<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
16<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nINITIAL ARRAIGNMENT
\nJDG0003<\/td>\n		Initial Arraignment
\nJudge Lisa L. Sutton<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
17<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF HEARING<\/td>\nNotice Of Hearing Untimely<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
18<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nMOTION<\/td>\nMotion Issue Subpoena<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
19<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Order Setting Trial Date
\nPretrial Omnibus<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
–<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF STATUS CONFERENCE
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Notice Of Status Conference
\nStatus Conference<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
–<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF TRIAL DATE
\nACTION<\/td>\n		Notice Of Trial Date
\n90 Day11-14-2011<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
20<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nNOTICE OF APPEARANCE<\/td>\nNotice Of Appearance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n
21<\/td>\n11-15-2011<\/td>\nORDER ESTABLISHING COND. OF RELEASE<\/td>\nOrder Establishing Cond. Of Release<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

No ‘SEALED’ records here and NO demand for Discovery, unlike the well oiled Mancillas defense.<\/p>\n

UPDATE:<\/strong>\u00a0 It should come as no surprise that the double standard of jurisprudence rendered by the Prosecutor in Thurston County would take care of its own (Sara Dotson and Ruben Mancillas) as revealed by the following events. Apparently they have not taken to eating their children yet, just yours.<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.theolympian.com\/2011\/11\/25\/1889907\/no-charges-for-detective.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Published\u00a0November 25, 2011<\/p>\n

No charges for Thurston detective<\/strong><\/p>\n

An undercover Thurston County narcotics detective arrested last week\u00a0on suspicion of unlawful imprisonment, domestic violence will not be\u00a0charged with a crime,\u00a0Pierce County\u00a0Prosecutor Mark Lindquist said\u00a0Wednesday.<\/p>\n

The Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office declared a conflict\u00a0of interest in connection with the detective’s\u00a0Nov. 15\u00a0arrest, and the\u00a0charging decision was left to the Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney’s\u00a0Office, Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney Jon\u00a0Tunheim\u00a0said.<\/p>\n

The detective, 34, who had returned from a 15-month Army deployment in\u00a0Afghanistan\u00a0in October, was accused of refusing to let his wife out of\u00a0their bedroom during an argument, court papers state.<\/p>\n

Lindquist said in a phone interview Wednesday that his office will not\u00a0file any criminal charges against the detective in connection with the\u00a0case because it “cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he\u00a0restricted her movement.”<\/p>\n

Lindquist added that his office had a follow-up conversation with the\u00a0detective’s wife, and she said that her husband “did not restrain her\u00a0and she was free to leave” during the argument.<\/p>\n

According to court papers, the woman had a different account of what\u00a0had happened when she spoke to a Lacey police officer who responded to\u00a0another domestic dispute at her and her husband’s home the night of\u00a0Nov. 13.<\/p>\n

On that date she told the Lacey officer that, during the\u00a0Nov. 8\u00a0argument, her husband had blocked the door, and told her: “You aren’t\u00a0going anywhere. We are going to figure this out,” court papers state.\u00a0She added that during the Nov. 8 argument, he had placed a revolver on\u00a0the bed, according to court papers.<\/p>\n

Also according to court papers:<\/p>\n

The woman had called police\u00a0on Nov. 13\u00a0to report that her husband had\u00a0a gun out during a dispute. The detective also called police, and said\u00a0“his service pistols are on his bed and that his wife was intoxicated\u00a0and his duty weapon were in his bedroom.” He also reported that his\u00a0wife hit him.<\/p>\n

The detective’s wife later told a Lacey police officer that they had\u00a0been married for 13 years, but had been verbally arguing “almost every\u00a0day” lately.<\/p>\n

The detective’s attorney, James Dixon, had said in a prior interview\u00a0that his client was innocent of the allegations against him.<\/p>\n

Thurston County Sheriff’s Lt. Greg Elwin said Wednesday that the\u00a0detective will remain on paid administrative reassignment pending the\u00a0outcome of the sheriff’s office’s internal investigation into the\u00a0allegations against the undercover detective.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Thurston County’s DV industry has begun eating its children: The Daily Olympian wouldn’t report Ruben S. Mancillas’ name as the Thurston Sheriff’s narcotics detective arrested for DV and unlawful imprisonment because (they claimed) he hadn’t actually been charged yet. \u00a0The … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4513"}],"version-history":[{"count":31,"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4513\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4678,"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4513\/revisions\/4678"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amicuscuria.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}