- Everything for Everyone-Housing Entitlement: Righteous/Reckless?
- WA Intervention
- Federal Judge May Trigger Land Reform Avalanche
- Clothing/Costumes/Recipes/Jokes =/= Copyrightable
- $291 Adobe Cancelation Fee=’Morally Cool’ to Pirate Software
- How WA State Voids Conveyances/Transfers of Assets
- How WA State Steals Your Estate If/When You Linger
- Sara Martin v Cody Sterling Dobbs #11-3-00153-6 dob:10/10/94
- WA Supreme Court Green Lights Drug Possession
- Gluttons for Punishment: Polygamy Is Back
- The Invisible Asylum
- State, Terran S Lawler vs Shamaron L Austin & Rachel R Lawler
- Day 2 of Chauvin trial: Tears, Emotion & Devastating testimony
- Confirmation Bias
- 14-1-01064-1 | State vs Harris, Kirsten Michelle
- Bob Charleston Xparte Vulnerable Adult Protection hearing on
- Oly Pep Talks & Beatings 12-5-20 on
- War Criminals Rewarded on
- 2 Black Shoplifting Suspects Critically Wounded by Oly Cop on
- 2 Black Shoplifting Suspects Critically Wounded by Oly Cop on
- Open Letter to Corrupt Thurston Co. Courts RE: ZOOM on
- Open Letter to Corrupt Thurston Co. Courts RE: ZOOM on
- Kenosha, WI cop shoots unarmed Black man 7X, point-blank on
- Oh for the Simple Joys of Maidenhood – Ode to Heather Lund on
- C Davis Self Destructs at Admin Hearing Alleging Voter Fraud (8-27-20) on
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- August 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- September 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Spotting 10 Logical Fallacies
A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning or a false assumption that might sound impressive but proves absolutely nothing. Sometimes they are completely unintentional, but more often than not, they are used by people during debates, arguments or presentations to mislead you into thinking, acting or behaving in a certain way.
As you might expect, salespeople, politicians and con artists use them all the time often very skillfully, and the public innocently continues to fall for them.
So, knowing how to spot a logical fallacy and call it out or refute it can be an incredibly useful life tool to have at your disposal.
Unsurprisingly there are a lot of logical fallacies, hundreds, in fact, so to learn them all is a big task. But to help you on your way here are the 10 most common ones for you to get your head around and start your learning journey.
1. The Ad Hominem
Let’s start with probably one of the most common offenders. Also called ‘poisoning the well’ or the ‘personal attack’ you will have, I am certain, seen the ad hominem fallacy used all the time.
How it works is that rather than refuting an opponent’s argument the person attacks the individual instead. This can be directed toward their character, morals, intelligence, reputation or credentials. In fact, it really doesn’t matter, the main thing to remember is that they are not addressing the actual argument being presented but relying purely on feelings and prejudices to win their case.
Here are some typical examples: “He is so evil you cannot trust a word he says about ______ ” or ”Of course you would say that because you support ________” (Incidentally, going forward, fill in all gaps any way you like!).
P.S. There is also a variation to the Ad Hominem called ‘Guilt by Association’ that you also need to watch out for and the clue to how is in its title!
2. The Appeal to Authority
This is another much loved and of course widely used and abused fallacy.
It works by stating that whatever is claimed is true because a ‘so-called’ authority said so rather than applying any logical reasoning providing any evidence to support the claim.
For example: “Raising interest rates by 3% MUST be in the best interests of the economy because the PM said so yesterday on the 9 o’clock news”.
3. The Straw Man
With this fallacy, you argue against a phony, weak or ridiculous position that you have created, and then proceed to easily knock it down.
For example: “Tree-hugging environmentalists are so dumb they think plants have feelings and are more important than humans”.
Basically every time you see one of those ever so funny comedy skits on Gootube ridiculing someone because they are (please take your pick here) vegan, meat eaters, millennials, GenX, silver surfers, gun owners, pacizsts, spiritual, non-spiritual, love tech, hate tech etc, you know how their little ruse works and what it’s called! [BTW, this argument is, in itself, a variant of the ad hominem attack.]
4. The Appeal To Ignorance
This fallacy works by using the premise that since we do not know (or cannot prove) something that it must be either true or false. Which, if you think about, is completely ridiculous as not knowing something isn’t proof of anything, well, other than you don’t know something.
Here are some simple examples:
‘We have no hard evidence that fairies exist. Which must mean they are so incredibly magical that they can make themselves completely invisible to humans’.
Or sometimes you might even see some ‘appeal to ignorance’ nonsense dressed up like this as a serious product endorsement:
‘This supplement is totally amazing because no one who has taken it so far has become sick!’
5. The False Dilemma
This is also sometimes known as the False Dichotomy, the Black and White Fallacy, or even the Bi-Furcation Fallacy. This is how it works:
Essentially you reduce an argument down to only two options despite the fact that there may be many more (and far better possibilities) to choose from e.g: ‘You’re either with us or against us’ (note #1: This sucker even helped start a horrific war!)
‘You either love me or you hate me’ (note #2: Hang on a minute, what about words such as; ‘like’, ‘fancy’, ‘adore’ or ‘respect’ – or the multitude of other hundreds of attitudes, opinions and emotions you can have about another person???).
6. The Slippery Slope, AKA: Domino Theory
This fallacy works by taking an argument from a sensible moderate place and moving it to an extreme place [reducto ad absurdum?] via a one thing leads to another kind of route regardless of any logic or rational evidence to support the claim.
Of course, like most fallacies, you will see it played out everywhere, but it is an extremely common occurrence in houses with strapping teenagers who have sensible, concerned parents. Typically the arguments go something like; “You simply must let me go to the psychedelic Goa trance music festival this weekend, if I don’t go my friends will think I am totally square and a complete loser, they will then dump me and I will end up with no life whatsoever, and be forced to spend the rest of my life living as a sad recluse with no job, no money, no job, no love life, no social life, and absolutely no future…”.
7. The Circular Argument (Petitio Principii or ‘Begging the Question’)
As well as the Circular Argument, Petitio Principii and Begging the Question it also has a fourth name which is; The Vicious Circle. It is
called this for a very good reason because it works by repeating what has just been said which, hey presto, creates a completely closed loop, AKA: a circle!
Here are some basic examples:
‘Everyone wants to go see the new Star Wars movie because it is the hottest film going at the moment’,
‘Psychic powers exist because I have witnessed what can only be described as extraordinary psychic power
(Note #3: This fallacy gained fame when it featured in the plot of a really good book called Catch 22. In it the protagonist claims he is mad in order to avoid fying dangerous bombing missions. However, he finds his claim rejected on the grounds that by claiming he is insane it actually proves he must be sane – as only a sane man would try and claim he was mad to avoid flying the deadly missions!).
8. The Alphabet Soup
This is the overuse of acronyms, abbreviations and occulted language to bamboozle people into thinking that they know what they are talking about and therefore must be right (and you are wrong and ignorant to boot). Sad to say the well-being industry is rife with this sort of hogwash often used to impress and confuse poor saps into taking a dubious course of treatment often at great expense to their body and wallet.
Example: “It is very often the case that someone suffering from DSW2 deficiency in their lymphatic C5X chromosome system will also show a 6% increase in IOK17 regression marked with a surge in B523C plasma filament growth. The obvious solution is a course of XbandPharm FSX17 meds twice daily and 6 XbandPharma HFD tablets every three days in the morning with a glass of water.”
9. The Bandwagon
The bandwagon fallacy works on the basis that something is correct, good, true, right or whatever the heck you want it to be just because most people think it is as well. Named after the horse-drawn cart that politicians used to travel around on shouting their dubious election promises and drawing attention to themselves so that people would give them their support and vote for them. If you were dumb enough be one of them, you could literally jump on the bandwagon and enjoy being taken for a ride!
Anyway, no surprises here but it is a completely fallacious argument. Just because lots of people might all agree with each other about something or another it doesn’t mean for one second they are all correct.
For example; ‘One billion people drink diet _____ every year so it must be the best soft drink in the world’.
10. The Red Herring
You may well have heard of this one. It’s pretty famous after all!
But you may not recognise it in real life as we mostly hear it mentioned in whodunnit TV crime shows.
So how does it work? Well, the red herring is a clever irrelevant argument that distracts you from the real topic being scrutinized.
Apparently named after the smelly fish used when training hunting dogs, it is most frequently employed by crafty individuals who lead the conversation (read; argument) away from an area that they are vulnerable into one that they feel is a safer territory.
As you might well imagine ‘guilty’ politicians absolutely love the red herring and will use it in almost every answer that they can possibly get away with e.g. ‘Why are we raising taxes? Well…hmm…we need to raise taxes to generate more revenue to support the existing commitments to primary school education. After all, children represent the future of the nation, don’t they? So we must always support them 100%. Don’t you agree?’
11. Political Correctness (special bonus fallacy)
Lastly, and as bit of a special added bonus the ‘PC argument’ (aka Language Control).
We are all for equality and fairness, but please bear with us on this one. This post-modern day piece of fallacious sophistry used to have another name. Ironically it was once simply known as the Name Calling Fallacy.
How it works is you change the nature of something by giving it another name. You must have seen the sort of thing on the news or in the papers all the time.
People are no longer ‘poor’ but ‘economically disadvantaged’, they are not ‘broke’ but ‘have a temporary negative cash flow situation’ and, of course, they no longer live in ‘slums’ but in ‘economically depressed urban environments’.
Naturally, the world of commerce and industry are masters of it just as much as governments are.
Have you noticed how ‘bad debt’ is now ‘an underperforming asset’ and that organizations love giving employees ‘up titles’ instead of raises’?
There is also another way that PC logic (often the total opposite of factual correctness) can be used very effectively. Rather than simply naming things, words can also be weaponized by turning them into ‘control words’ which can be employed effectively especially via name calling strategies.
These are typically used to shut down debates, inhibit critical thinking and corral the target down carefully constructed mental pathways (safely away from the issue being discussed).
Of course, as mentioned at the start, there are literally hundreds of other logical fallacies such as the Hasty Generalization, Fallacy of Sunk Costs, False Analogy, Ad-hoc Reasoning and even the Fallacy Fallacy to name just a few more.
What are your thoughts on the ones presented here? Have you been caught out by a ‘logical fallacy’ lately? Perhaps you have a ‘favorite’ fallacy you would like to share? Let us know in the comments.
15 Logical Fallacies You Should Know Before Getting Into a Debate https://thebestschools.org/magazine/15-logical-fallacies-know/