Longview Labor Dispute w/Longshore Union Erupts in Violence

Some may recall organized labor turning its back on Mason County residents in our own struggle against a rapacious internationally owned corporation (Adage) intent on destroying the community’s health, environment, and quality of life with the promise of “jobs, jobs, jobs!” One local activist warned our blue collar brethren of the need to remain each other’s natural allies given the common thread running through the community and history of organized labor. Despite such advised prudence and the invitation to stand in solidarity with this community, after being publicly asked since when labor stood with corporate interests instead of with the people, one union official from the Vancouver region of Washington opined such history was practically ancient and no longer relevant in the newly formed bond labor and corporate interests found in each other’s arms.

Now Washington’s longshoremen are angry–very angry, violently so…and with good reason. They’ve been stabbed in the back by the very corporate interests the above mentioned apologist so glibly defended as Mason County residents crowded against the wall pleaded for solidarity. The following ironic excerpts explaining the angst and violence was taken from an article published in THE STAND on 9-8-11 by David Groves:

Angry Longshore Workers in Longview

Longview Police Chief

LONGVIEW (Sept. 8th) —Violence erupted today in a major labor dispute that has simmered for months at the Port of Longview, leading to work shutdowns at ports up and down the Washington coast. Why are members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) — and their supporters in Washington and Oregon — so upset about a grain terminal that employs just 50 workers?

Here’s why.

EGT Development is a joint venture of Japan-based Itochu Corp, South Korea’s STX Pan Ocean and St. Louis-based Bunge North America. Like so many corporations that promise good jobs to get what they want, EGT got a special state tax exemption and a sweetheart lease deal from the Port of Longview to build a $200 million grain terminal there. The government even seized adjacent land for the project. But as soon as the deal’s ink was dry and the ceremonial first shovel of dirt was overturned two years ago, EGT began running the project on the cheap.

Despite high unemployment in Cowlitz County and the availability of hundreds of skilled union building trades workers, EGT imported the vast majority of its construction crews from low-wage communities out-of-state and did not pay area standard wages, leading to howls from the local labor community.

EGT Terminal

After the terminal was built, EGT decided to ignore the Port of Longview’s contract with ILWU Local 21 to hire union labor on its leased site. Instead, the multinational conglomerate hired non-union workers — claiming it would save the company $1 million a year (a figure the company later admitted had been plucked from the sky) — and EGT sued the Port, arguing it was not bound by the contract with the ILWU.

For months, ILWU picketed EGT and attempted to pressure the company to negotiate with the union. Those protests gradually grew in size as EGT refused to meet with the union, culminating in a major rally on June 3, when more than 1,000 ILWU supporters from Washington to California rallied outside EGT’s headquarters in downtown Portland. The protest was loud, but nonviolent.

The dispute escalated at a July 11 protest outside the EGT terminal in Longview, when members tore down a chain-link gate and stormed the EGT grain terminal. About 100 union dock workers, including union leaders, were cited and arrested.

“We are going to fight for our jobs in our jurisdiction. We have worked this dock for 70 years, and to have a big, rich corporation come in and say, ‘We don’t want you,’ is a problem,” ILWU 21 President Dan Coffman told the (Longview) Daily News. “We’re all together. We’re all going to jail as a union.”

Terminal Dispute

On July 14, hundreds of union dock workers crowded onto railroad tracks to block a train from delivering grain to the EGT terminal. The Daily News reported that the 107-car train was rerouted to Vancouver following the standoff, which prompted Burlington Northern Santa Fe to indefinitely suspend train traffic to the grain terminal for safety reasons.

Trains Rerouted for Safety

“By far this is the most intense labor event that I can remember,” Cowlitz County Sheriff Mark Nelson told the Daily News. But he said he understands what the union is trying to accomplish even though he didn’t agree with its tactics. “Bless their hearts. These are our neighbors, too. These are our folks. This is our community.”

Strike Spreads to Tacoma & Seattle

EGT was feeling the heat, and community support for the local ILWU workers was growing as more people learned the facts of the dispute.

Then the company made a surprise announcement that it would hire a unionized subcontractor to run the terminal. EGT signed an agreement with Federal Way-based General Construction Co., a subsidiary of Kiewit, to operate the terminal with union members from the Portland-based International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701.

Face Off

The Washington State Labor Council condemned EGT’s attempt to pit union members against each other.

ILWU Workers Block Grain Train

“EGT, a Japanese multinational corporation that has received tax breaks from our state to build this grain elevator, has thumbed its nose at the members of ILWU Local 21  and is trying to pit workers against workers, local unions against local unions. This is unacceptable,” said WSLC President Jeff Johnson (pictured at left at a July 24 rally). “The work at the Port of Longview is longshore work and we need to come together as community and labor and say ‘no’ to EGT — ‘you will not disrespect labor in Longview or anywhere else in our state’.”

Tensions Escalate

There have been numerous incidents provoked by EGT’s union-vs.-union arrangement. Most recently, a contractor drove right through the ILWU picket line on Aug. 29 and struck two ILWU members who, fortunately, were not seriously injured. Although the contractor was not cited or arrested for the vehicular assault, an angry ILWU picketer was arrested for allegedly damaging the next vehicle that attempted to cross the picket line, a charge based on video surveillance provided by an EGT security guard.

The next day, the National Labor Relations Board announced it was seeking a court order to end “aggressive picketing” at the EGT facility and allow Burlington Northern Santa Fe trains to deliver grain to the facility. Such an order was issued last week, according to Rich Ahearn, director of the NLRB’s Seattle office.

Which brings us to yesterday, Sept. 7.

Port Protest

Some 400 ILWU members stood on the railroad tracks to block a train from delivering grain to the terminal for about four hours, but the train passed through after protesters were confronted by 50 police officers in riot gear.  ILWU President Robert McEllrath, who attended the protest, was detained by police, escalating tensions between protesters and officers. In the confrontation that ensued, police beat protesters away with clubs and pepper spray.

ILWU International President Robert McEllrath

ILWU President Robert McEllrath is detained by police Sept. 7. 

Ultimately, McEllrath returned to urge members to end the standoff.

ILWU vs. EGT

“You can get maced and tear-gassed and clubbed (today)” or wait for longshore support from all over the West Coast when the next train tries to enter the EGT terminal, McEllrath reportedly told protesters after he met with police. “If we leave here, it doesn’t mean that we gave up and quit. It means we’re coming back.”

Tensions Build

All but 16 of the protesters returned to the union hall; the 16 who refused were arrested for trespassing.

2 Protestors Break Through Police Lines

Early this morning, hundreds of ILWU members and their supporters reportedly stormed the EGT terminal at the Port of Longview, broke down the gates, overpowered security guards, damaged railroad cars, and dumped grain, according to Longview Police Chief Jim Duscha. Initial reports indicated no one was hurt and nobody has been arrested. After a few hours, the protesters returned to their union hall.

Uneasy Standoff

So that’s where we stand, as of this writing.

Courage

To sum up: a taxpayer-subsidized international conglomerate, which is operating on public property, is suing the public so it can avoid paying the area’s standard wages and undercut its competitors that do. Then, it exacerbated tensions with the local labor community by importing union workers from another jurisdiction to cross the picket lines.

Police Grab Longshoreman

That’s why ILWU members are angry, and that’s why this is about more than just 50 jobs in Longview.

Peace Train?

About admin

Opposed to politicians who equivocate about air quality & BioMassacre
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Longview Labor Dispute w/Longshore Union Erupts in Violence

  1. admin says:

    TACOMA, WA. — Federal Judge Ronald Leighton held an ILWU local in contempt of court Thursday, after police testified hundreds of ILWU members attacked a grain terminal in SW Washington, smashing windows and menacing security guards.

    The federal district court judge stated he wants the Longview grain terminal operator, EGT, to provide an accounting of the damage to gauge how much the ILWU Locals 4 & 21 should be fined.

    Judge Leighton previously issued a temporary restraining order prior to last week’s protests, requiring the union to refrain from blocking entrances to the grain terminal. ILWU members, angered because EGT hired a contractor employing workers from a separate union, persistently blocked the train carrying grain shipments, then stormed the terminal and dumped grain the railroad cars.

    8 ILWU members were seized for investigation by Thursday evening — 7 for criminal trespassing, and 1 for assault and other charges.

    Leighton questioned whether it would be useful to order a schedule of fines in case the union violated court orders again, but thought better of it.

    “It’s like asking parents of a delinquent to predict their child’s behavior,” he said.

    ILWU has a contract with the Port of Longview giving it the right to work at the Port, but EGT argues it need not follow the agreement, not being a party to it.

    Leal Sundet, ILWU’s coast division, observed the company hadn’t been held accountable for injuring the community with its cynical decisions to trash collective bargaining agreements.

    “It’s a crime when union members stand on a train track exercising their First Amendment rights,” Sundet said. “But, when a huge international corporation rips off an entire community, it’s protected under the guise of laws passed by legislators beholden to corporate special interests and their lobbyists.”

    Judge Leighton’s ruling finding the ILWU in contempt considered testimony presented about what happened during the labor protests and the assault on the facility. Security guard Charlie Cadwell, a Columbia Security employee for patrols for the Longview grain terminal, testified about the frightening experience: Every ILWU protester he saw was carrying a weapon — pipes, bats, garden implements.

    “I saw no longshoreman who didn’t have something in hand,” he stated.

    After being pulled out of his car by one longshoreman, another one swung a metal pipe at him, he testified.

    “I said, ‘You have 50 cameras on you and law enforcement is on its way,'” Cadwell recalled. “He said, ‘F**k you. We’re here for the train, not you.'”

    Meanwhile, his car was driven off and eventually run into a ditch. Cadwell said 40 – 50 people were throwing rocks, that he was hit between his eyes and in his knee.

    Asked how he knew the men who assaulted him were ILWU workers, he recalled recognizing them from previous encounters. Prior to working at the grain terminal, he’d worked at Weyerhauser for 5 years. There he also worked with the longshoremen.

    Kenneth Sharped, another Columbia Security employee, stated he too was threatened with a bat, and while inside a guard shack, a glass window was broken.

    One police officer and other security guards gave testimony about additional verbal threats. One man swore he heard what sounded like pneumatic hoses being cut on the train.

    Federal labor representatives recommended a fine of $25,000 for any future restraining order violation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.