Shelton, WA (2-8-21) — This cause #21-2-00056-23 filed by Robert Charleston against Timothy Allen Mallea was heard on the ex parte calendar, 2-8-21. The voice you hear kibitzing in Bob’s ear is his friend, Jeffrey Denison, who prepared the paperwork for Bob we see the judge rejecting as inadequate/incomplete.
Timothy Allen Mallea (DOB: 11-26-83), Bob’s nemesis, is a registered sex offender convicted for molesting an underage girl (Mason #01-8-224-0), a serial DV abuser, drug addict, identity thief, bank fraudster, who attempted to pimp his young GF for $25 according to Bob, local police in Mason County, and a footlocker of public records/convictions stretching back for decades.
Police are very interested in finding Tim and reportedly have warrants for his arrest. He is known to sleep in the wood on the ground near the county dump and frequent the Little Creek Casino. It’s been said there’s a big drug house over by little creek run by a guy Tim Mallea is rumored to be well acquainted with that goes by casino rick and gives girls a place to stay and do drugs then whores them out at Little Creek Casino.
Case Information
21-2-00056-23 | ROBERT HENRY CHARLESTON vs TIM ALLEN MALLEA
Case Number
21-2-00056-23
Court
Mason
File Date
02/05/2021
Case Type
VAP Vulnerable Adult Protection Order
Case Status
Active
Party
Respondent (WIP)
MALLEA, TIM ALLEN
DOB
XX/XX/1983
Petitioner (WIP)
CHARLESTON, ROBERT HENRY
DOB
XX/XX/1947
Events and Hearings
- 02/05/2021 Confidential Information Form
- 02/05/2021 Petition for Vulnerable Adult Protection Order
View Document Petition for Vulnerable Adult Protection Order
- 02/05/2021 Sealed Financial Source Documents
Comment
OCCU RECORDS
- 02/08/2021 Motion Hearing
View Document Motion Hearing
Judicial Officer
Sauerlender, Robert D
- 02/08/2021 Declaration Affidavit
View Document Declaration Affidavit
Comment
OF PAMELA ANGLEMYER IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
- 02/08/2021 Copy
View Document Copy
Comment
DECLARATION OF HEIDI MALLEA
- 02/09/2021 Temporary Vulnerable Adult Protection Order
View Document Temporary Vulnerable Adult Protection Order
Judicial Officer
Sauerlender, Robert D
- 02/22/2021 Vulnerable Adult Protection Order
Judicial Officer
Cobb, Monty D
Hearing Time
9:00 AM
From Jeffrey Denison:
Jesus John, is there a reason you had to post that? My assistance wasn’t for public information. I helped him privately. If you need to publish everything I’m not going to work with you in the future.
You sent February 8 at 6:41 PM
You insisted on being picked up on the public audio as much as I did. The court and the public has a right to know who is being recorded for the record. You made yourself part of that record. If you don’t want to be quoted AND identified, don’t volunteer audio for the record. There’s NO expectation of privacy in that courtroom.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 6:41 PM
Well, then there’s no expectation of any further assistance from me on anything.
You sent February 8 at 6:43 PM
Suit yourself. I report what I see and hear and don’t yield editorial control to anyone, period.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 6:43 PM
Suit yourself. Your loss.
You sent February 8 at 6:47 PM
It’s not like I’m unable to write without you. Emotional blackmail is pretty much like water off a duck’s back here. And you could have completed the form for Bob since you led him to believe he could rely on your assistance. The judge rejected the paperwork as inadequate/incomplete. The public’s entitled to know why. I’m satisfied my associating your voice with the paperwork submitted was a valuable piece of information and of public interest.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 6:52 PM
No I was clear with both him & the court that he was filing & I was assisting. I’ve worked as best as I could to assist in providing you information about Antifa violence over the past 6 months.
You sent February 8 at 6:53 PM
So? A common enemy. That’s not a gift, that’s a given.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 6:54 PM
It’s not a given that I provide you with information so you were able to cover those stories.
You sent February 8 at 6:54 PM
And, I knew of ANTIFA a long time before I met you and their roots. I need no help in despising them.
You sent February 8 at 6:55 PM
I didn’t report that you furnished me information. I reported what I saw and heard and recognized in open court as any journalist would have.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 6:56 PM
You used plenty of the information I provided you. You did rely on the information I provided.
You sent February 8 at 6:56 PM
YOU are demanding the equivalent that I avert my eyes/ears/camera. I won’t do that–ever.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 6:57 PM
oh well, later.
You sent February 8 at 6:58 PM
So? There’s a difference. I didn’t reveal my source. I revealed you as the voice that is now part of the court’s public record. Go back and listen to what the judge in Dana’s case had to say about your concern. The folks in that courtroom didn’t want me recording and identifying them either. But that’s what I do.
You sent February 8 at 7:00 PM
I published it. Go and listen to the judge’s remarks. They’re precisely on point over what you’re complaining about. He said, don’t want to be recorded? Then reconsider coming to court. It’s the MOST public of all our forums/venues!
You sent February 8 at 7:01 PM
You should know better than introducing your voice into the public record expecting it to remain anonymous.
You sent February 8 at 7:02 PM
Frankly, it made it sound like Bob was being controlled or manipulated.
You sent February 8 at 7:03 PM
I’ve sat in courtrooms with clients that paid me to be there, but no judge would ever permit me to do what you did.
You sent February 8 at 7:05 PM
And, as far as all this goes, I think you’re getting the better part of the ‘bargain’ by accessing my expertise and resources. But I’m not here to keep you from shooting yourself in the foot.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 7:07 PM
John I assisted him in writing. He prepared & filed his own paperwork. I’m not a paralegal & don’t pretend to be one.
You sent February 8 at 7:07 PM
“Journalism is publishing what someone doesn’t want printed. All else is PR.” -R. Hearst-
You sent February 8 at 7:08 PM
Jeffrey, you made Bob sound like your dummy by audibly kibitzing.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 7:10 PM
Bob filed his own documents. He filed his own petition.
You sent February 8 at 7:11 PM
Then a clear indication of his incompetency and inability to protect himself, thus a vulnerable adult–an important status to achieve in court for legal leverage,
You sent February 8 at 7:13 PM
He almost trivialized this guy’s actions. compared to what he told me over the phone. The greater community that know Timothy and went to school with him agree with me.
You sent February 8 at 7:13 PM
It was all being lost in losing sight of the forest because of the trees.
You sent February 8 at 7:14 PM
This dude could be SELLING Bob’s identity/personal info as we speak.
You sent February 8 at 7:14 PM
Even now, Bob appears oblivious to the ramifications.
You sent February 8 at 7:16 PM
The judge was too willing to pigeon-hole Bob, and that was an injustice. You’re right, Bob can BARELY take care of himself at best.
You sent February 8 at 7:17 PM
A vulnerable adult who has been victimized has a better chance of recovering their $ from the theft.
You sent February 8 at 7:17 PM
Bob told me he’s now destitute.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 10:44 PM
John, I did my best to assist Bob & you attacked me for it. That’s not journalism. It’s a personal attack. You know Tim is a dangerous risk to the community, probably a meth addict, probably linked to a great deal of local crime. You put me at risk of being targeted for retaliation. Your information is incorrect & I asked you to remove it.
You sent February 8 at 10:48 PM
I don’t agree w/you in any event nor am I convinced Bob didn’t rely on you in preparing the forms he filed–especially after listening to you describing the process and your labors on it. I’m prone to attacking incompetence–the rule is, first–do no harm. Incompetence is pernicious. There are genuine remedies and assistance for vulnerable adults which you may have queered.
You sent February 8 at 10:49 PM
And no, I won’t remove it.
You sent February 8 at 10:50 PM
That’s the same demand in another wrapper ANTIFA makes. I take no prisoners when I’m writing/publishing.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 10:56 PM
John your statement is false. You attacked me because you’re angry about something, probably because you flooded me with useless documents knowing full well I could not wade through them all & I told you that. I asked your assistance on a legal matter to help a mutual friend & you used it to attack me publicly, putting me at personal risk.
You sent February 8 at 10:57 PM
I would have sent you nothing if I hadn’t been convinced you were working on Bob’s case (which, BTW, he told me you were) and you have a track record of trying to oversee my editorial policy.
You sent February 8 at 11:00 PM
The fact you were identified kibitzing in Bob’s ear in open court puts you at no more risk than you chose. It’s a public forum designed to create a public record, not a forum for people with paper bags over their head. You have NO right to privacy in a public court hearing.
Jeffrey sent February 8 at 11:00 PM
I won’t be working with you again. I should have known better.
You sent February 8 at 11:01 PM
Guess so. This isn’t the 1st time I’ve given explicit notice over what occurs and my coverage in public venues.
You sent February 8 at 11:05 PM
You’re a perfect example of why I say a reporter has no friends…or shouldn’t have if they’re any good. ‘Friends’ expect favors. And besides, you demonstrate the depth of that ‘friendship’ with your brazen attempts at emotional blackmail even as we speak. In case you hadn’t noticed, I’ve developed an exceedingly thick skin as a reporter and neither fear your disapproval, nor your hate, nor do I seek your favor.