Latent Psychopathology: Family Courts

Marin County Civic Center Shooting, August 1970

Notice: Maladministration & Interference in Familial Association & Liberty

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

We, the People of the 50 American States, Republican in form, (as seen in Washington’s and the U.S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 1) Sui Juris, do bring you this Notice so that you and your agents provide immediate due care;

Please take notice, that the People have assembled and know the fundamental laws and their inherent rights to instruct our representatives of their duties contained in the Express Trust Indenture, the California Constitution. We wish to remind you of your sworn oath, that binds you to preserve these personal rights, while upholding the law of God.

California Constitution Article II Text of Section 1:
“All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require.”

California Constitution Article 1 Text of Section 3:

(a) “The people have the right to instruct their representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and assemble freely to consult for the common good.”

Please take notice, that the People have gained knowledge and now realize and know that government actors, across every state, have been coming together in Title 42 programs (non-positive law), and using legislative tribunals (not courts of record) to take children from parents unlawfully. These same government actors are, at the same time, also making money from federal programs, functioning outside of their constitutional duties.

California Constitution Article 1 Text of Section 7:
“A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the law. “

Maxim of Law: 77f. No freeman shall be deprived of life, liberty or property but by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land—that is by the common law. C.L.M.

Maxim of Law: 63y. It is the duty of a judge to declare [enunciate] the law, not to enact the law or make it. Lofft, 42; Tray. Leg. Max. 283; Lofft. App. 42.

California Constitution Article VI Text of Section 1:

(a) “The judicial power of this State is vested in the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts, all of which are courts of record.” [Highlight added for emphasis]

Black’s Law 4th Edition. Courts of record – A “court of record” is a judicial tribunal having the attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it, and proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo. App. 220, 175 W.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc.Mass., 171, per Shaw, C. J. See, also, Ledwith v. Roselsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689

Maxim of Law: 63f. A good judge should do nothing of his own arbitrary will, nor on the dictate of his personal inclination, but should decide according to law and justice. 7, Coke, 27a.

California Constitution Article III Text of Section 3:
“The powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial. Persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this Constitution.”

Maxim of Law: 44n. To commit [an act] and not to prohibit one when in your power, is the same thing; and he who does not prohibit or forbid when he can prevent it is in fault, or does the same as ordering it to be done. 2 Inst. 146, 308; 3 Inst. 158.

Please take notice, it is clear in section 1101 (6)(d) of the 1935 Social Security Act that there was never an original intent for the Legislature to grant authority to take children against the parents’ objections. (see evidence below)

Social Security Act 1935
SECTION 1101(6)(d
) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing any Federal official, agent, or representative, in carrying out any of the provisions of this Act, to take charge of any child over the objection of either of the parents of such child, or of the person standing in loco parentis to such child. [Highlight added for Emphasis.]

Maxim of Law: 36p. Equity suffers not a wrong without a remedy. 4 Bouv. Inst. no. 3726

Please take further Notice, Contra Costa Family Court is a creature of the legislature, operating in a statutory jurisdiction, and can never be used arbitrarily, to terminate Common Law Rights of One of The People. Black’s Law 5th Edition defines Common Law as being distinguished from law made by legislative enactment. All legislative tribunals moving in the name of Contra Costa Family Court operate as courts that are not independent of the legislature. Therefore, by definition, they are not independent courts of record. The non-judicial tribunal, held by Leonard E. Marquez, sent correspondence to Andrea Guerrero on September 25th, 2023, with threats of sanctions, family court attorney fees, possible civil and criminal penalties, and may place orders that would further affect her Inherent rights as a Parent. Leonard E. Marquez is acting in maladministration and circumventing fundamental principles of law and historical customs that Parents are to be in the full care, custody and control of their children. [Highlight added for emphasis]

Black’s Law 11th Edition. Maladministration. (17c) Poor management or regulation by a public officer; specif., an official’s abuse of power.

Maxim of Law: 65c. An action of a judge which relates not to his office is of no force. Dig. 50, 17, 170; 10 Coke, 76. A judicial act before one not a judge is void. Lofft. 458

Maxim of Law: 86j. The right of blood and kindred cannot be destroyed by any civil law. Dig. 50, 17, 9; Bacon, Max. 533; Jackson v. Phillips, 14 Allen (Mass.) 562.

Please take notice, that it is my wish, as one of the People, you shall immediately and openly declare, you are using these unlawful acts of non-judicial tribunals to infringe upon the individual rights of parents, as well as taking their children using courts not of record, without constitutional due process. It is my demand, as one of the People, that you, Legislative body members, immediately bring forth investigations into these unlawful acts. As public servants and trustees, you have the duty to immediately correct this issue.

Please take final Notice, the People wish for you to show clear grants of constitutional authority that allow you to use non-judicial tribunals to take liberty interests from parents without constitutional due process. If you believe any of the above claims are untrue or that you have the authority to harm, infringe and trespass upon the rights of the free People, please provide the Constitutional Provisions that grant you such authority. All responses must be submitted by affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 3 (three) days of receiving this Notice or you agree, by acquiescence, all statements in this Notice to be true and fact. Any disputes by any public officials who are bound by contract to the California Constitution, agree to have these matters heard before an arbitrator of my choice and bound thereby. Further, you agree that you are acting with full knowledge, intent, and malice by trespassing against the People’s Inherent Rights, and that no court shall be able to rehear this matter, but it shall stand as true, and evidence in all courts of record.

Lastly, this notice is sent in the peace and love of Christ, and that you will use good faith to immediately take action to stop and correct these actions that have been done without authority and lawful jurisdiction.

About admin

Opposed to politicians who equivocate about air quality & BioMassacre
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.