Professor Peter Bohmer Urges/Demands ‘Advocacy’ journalism

While working on editing the almost 2 hour recordings of the 9-7-12 Traditions (Fair Trade) Cafe billed as ‘PUBLIC’ (the public was invited) and announcing the event would be FILMED, a call from one of the panelists (TESC professor, Peter Bohmer) came urging an editorial policy shift for this publication/reporter.

This call from Professor Pete Bohmer was regarding the controversy surrounding the recent spate of threats/intimidation for covering what was billed as a public event (the public was invited to attend) and announcing well in advance it was to be filmed was advertised. (Traditions in Olympia on 9-7-12 @ 7:00pm) A group of panelists were to make presentations under the title: Resisting Grand Jury Subpoenas & Know Your Rights. These included Professor Peter Bohmer and a couple of young women under Grand Jury subpoena from Portland. The ostensible organizer was a local attorney and Media Island volunteer, Mike Coday, who resides with his wife in the Chehalis/Centralia area.

Pete urged this investigatory journalist to sign onto the notion people had some ‘right‘ not to be recorded/filmed/photographed or documented when participating in a public event such as this unless they ‘consented‘. My position (substantiated in law) is that citizens have no expectation of privacy in a public forum and ‘consentIS IMPLIED–certainly in law. We all know (or should) if we stand up in a crowded movie theater and yell “FIRE!”, that nobody (including journalists) is obligated on any level (legally or ethically) to protect any possible anonymity, to fail to document/record/film/photograph the incident, or to refrain from reporting on it in full. The act need not be illegal. The public has an intrinsic and legal right to the making and dissemination of news reports regarding what occurs in public venues.

Pete went on to advise he would condone attempts to bar or remove this reporter from future public venues if he didn’t subscribe to or adopt an ‘advocacy journalism’ style such as, for instance, Amy Goodman’s. The response he got was ‘advocacy‘ editorials were a possibility if well considered and voluntary, but the reporting on facts, images, and audio in the actual public venue event itself must remain unaltered in the service of accuracy and the public’s right to know unless a confidentiality agreement with a source has been consummated. Though, under some circumstances, identities may be blurred where an immediate or tangible threat to the safety of the subject can be demonstrated (e.g. underground Jews in Nazi Germany) it remains an editorial decision under a tremendously huge umbrella called JOURNALISM encompassing reporters of every stripe and persuasion. Their right to cover news for the public at public venues, however, remains undifferentiated. Moreover, the participants in these events are SEEKING ‘publicity’, as are those who commit wanton public street violence in demonstrations. To then claim news footage documenting their acts (or even their identities) somehow violates there right to anonymity in the absence of explicit consent is the height of sophistry and arrogance–a blatant bid for control through, as it so happens, threat and intimidation.

The right of the public to cover news events in public venues is clearly established and enshrined in our 1st Amendment. The case law easily reflects this fact. But a debate/discussion on the relationship of the press and independent citizen reporters with radical (even violent) elements of political activists might be productive to all interested parties were it carefully modulated/facilitated (with equal time to the different viewpoints) by a trusted group such as the League of Women Voters.

Even were the U.S. Constitution yet unwritten, we (the people) have an inalienable right to speak, to see, to hear…these rights are part of our nature…our humanity, and we are endowed with them by our creator, not by the largess of government…or the consent of radical political elements.

In this instance, the government we have chosen has recognized these rights and codified them in our 1st Amendment guarantees. We have the right to speak as well as NOT to speak…to express ourselves in dance, in speech, in literature, in music, in art, in a myriad of ways as countless as the stars. Similarly, we have the right to report, to record, to document, to film, to photograph, to draw, etc. what we see, hear, feel, smell, sense. It is an inalienable right and part of our nature. We do not, intrinsically, have the right to deny others their senses or documenting, reporting, recording, filming, photographing the same in a public forum. That is the law in America. It is also common sense.

Singling out journalists a radical faction does not like/trust for assault or intimidation is essentially an assault on the public’s rights. Personal ethics of convenience may not legitimately be substituted for those brightly demarcated boundaries established under the law. Professor Pete Bohmer takes issue with this critical reasoning. He does not agree with it.  Some of his supporters and many of the most violently radical so called blac bloc anarchists don’t either. He, et ux, profess more conviction for solidarity than the public’s right to freedom of the press. But unless we, the people (public) are to cede the streets to violence, assault, massive property destruction, coercion, intimidation, and blackmail, we have no choice but to resist a course that would lead to eliminating those rights & liberties we have left.

Corruption in government is rife and a direct threat to these rights & liberties. But so is corruption within the people. Both must be guarded against.

Perhaps Salmon Rushdie’s poignant telling the story of going into hiding after a fatwa was issued against him by Ayatollah Khomeini provides the greatest insight into where either/both forms of corruption lead when the press is reviled. You can read Mr. Rushdie’s piece by clicking on the following link:

Publishing Satanic Verses and going into hiding story.

Have we acquired our own version of Ayatollah Khomeini right here, at home, working as a professor on the TESC (Evergreen) campus?

OR

Why complain of the attention/publicity one seeks?

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Why Grand Jury Subpoenas are issued:

Billed as GRAND JURY RESISTANCE & KNOW YOUR RIGHTS, the public has been invited to attend a panel discussion of recent events surrounding the Seattle May Day street violence and the justice system’s reaction to the same. Those targeted by the Grand Jury subpoenas protest their ‘rights’ are being violated (presumably their 1st Amendment rights) in what amounts to a political witch hunt for ‘anarchists’ and their associates. Yet the rhetoric exposed on Facebook pages belies this claim as activists openly threaten investigatory reporters & photojournalist seeking to cover this news as part of the public invited to attend.

The following are pertinent excerpts from that exchange from Mike Coday’s Facebook page created for the purpose of organizing and promoting it. The content of much of that rhetoric serves to reinforce the antipathy much of the public holds for those being investigated.

A panel discussion about the recent raids and subpoenas targeting activists in the Pacific NW

Event is free, open to the public and disability affirmative!

Join your community allies for a discussion about the federal grand jury process and how it is abused to repress political
movements and activists. The past few years government witch hunts went after activists in Minneapolis, Chicago and Oakland. Now in the past month, NW activists have been targeted by the FBI;having their homes raided, computers seized, as well as being
served grand jury subpoenas to testify against their fellow community members. Find out how you can resist political
repression and support activists.

Lauren Regan is the founder, executive director, and staff attorney of the Civil Liberties Defense Center (CLDC). She has worked with targeted communities and hundreds of activists confronted with federal grand jury threats over the last 15 years. The CLDC
educates and defends activist engages in radical or progressive social change in order to empower effective activist and organizers working to confront the current repressive political climate. Knowledge is power, know your rights in order to powerfully advocate for the change you want to see in the world.

We have camera gear reserved from TCTV through Media Island and plan to capture the event on video. It does seem like an important topic and I would like to commit that we will be able to produce an informative video (or series of short videos) on grand jury resistance, but we capture a lot of footage and are only occasionally able to release a finished product. Usually hours and hours of video-editing for a couple of minutes of video. It’s time-consuming work. MaybeMarylea Coday and I have some future video project saved to disk, a record of Oly political action, that will allow us to weave minutes from many events into a big project. May have time for that when I retire from work force. All that said, we would like to get out a rough cut of this event to get the word out. Also willing to share the footage if there are video editors out there with time on their hands.
 ·  ·  · Sunday at 9:26am

  • Amanda Coday likes this.
    • Sammy Harvell make sure that the people you film are down with being on camera please.
      Sunday at 9:50am ·  · 4
    • Benjamin SittingBull That sounds like a bad idea I wouldn’t disscuss anything of legality with someone recording
      Sunday at 10:54am via mobile ·  · 1
    • Christy X Mpaa Rating ‎@Mike -As a documentary filmmaker, I would personally choose to not shoot this presentation – out of respect for everyone involved, I would make a different choice. I agree with the comments above – Assuming you have produced other sensitive work (involving legal issues), posting a public note/letter of the taping sounds appropriate. I’m not sure what you mean about “only being occasionally able to to release a finished product”. Why would you shoot anything without the intention to release it somewhere/somehow? Just asking.
      Yesterday at 12:04am ·  · 2
    •  Amicus Curia So, is this presentation for 9-7-12? It’s a small venue, but more people could make plans if they didn’t have to guess which Friday it will be held. So long as the owner of the venue (Traditions is PRIVATE PROPERTY–I know, a 4-letter word for some) permits taping, it’s really an editorial call on the part of the journalist. I can help and might bring my own tripod to film this. But it’s also important not to set people up for retribution or even Grand Jury subpoenas. Recall the reporter working for NPR who got fired for being seen participating in an Occupy Washington, D.C. event when her bosses saw her on a news clip?
    • Sammy Harvell yo but for real. it’s called consent. and if people don’t give it to you, you shouldn’t film them. there are other ways you can make an informative video.
      Yesterday at 12:42am ·  · 5
    • Perhaps those who have reason (or belief) to fear could have their faces edited or even wear dark glasses and other facial masking apparel? I’d favor this approach because it *IS* true that the authority goons do use such photos and clips for intelligence, just as they did in the late 60’s during the anti-war demonstrations as they took photos of the participants from rooftops. Not so much later, those young men found draft notices waiting for them in their mailbox. It’s naive to think government agents who are scouring major media news photos and urging citizens to call their snitch line or offer any photos they have won’t be utilizing THIS footage for their agenda. It’s a given the system is corrupt. I would urge those sensitive to this issue who plan to speak or attend to mask their identities–I doubt the Traditions proprietor would object under the circumstances. The thought police are out in force.
    • Christy X Mpaa Rating 

      I’m really not sure why any tried and true media professional (with integrity) would want to film anything that could be used against a stranger/civilian for any legal purpose/intention – true journalism or filmmaking doesn’t require the exploitation of people, or require them to cover their faces in a crowd during a public gathering that is panel based, and not a protest or action (where they might CHOOSE to cover up for their own reasons). Work that is based around a “building” and not the comfort level and respect of the people is questionable in my book. The word “permit” was mentioned in one of the above posts and I always shoot with one – If a filmmaker, videographer or journalist is serious about even protecting their own ass, (let alone the folks they are filming) they have one.
      Yesterday at 1:07am ·  · 1
    • The media/press has no more ‘rights’ than anyone else. They also have no less! In a public venue, the law certainly allows for filming/photographing whatever is visible, in general. The ‘ethics’ are somewhat more nuanced. I agree that filming where it is obvious a subject may be persecuted for their beliefs/statements is dicey–ethically. But the technology for hidden cameras/video is well developed and the government certainly isn’t above using it. I wouldn’t count on a lack of VISIBLE cameras offering any real security to participants against an oppressive administration. As far as a ‘permit’ goes, I’m not certain what you’re suggesting. I usually go as far as asking the OWNER of a private venue (or their agent) if they object to my taking pictures there. If it’s a PUBLIC venue, I don’t require (legally) anyone’s permission. As far as ‘safety’, that’s a 2-edged sword. You threaten/assault a journalist, you will likely be prosecuted. The reason people are being subpoenaed NOW by the Grand Jury is some engaged in criminal conduct IN PUBLIC. Your argument suggests a journalist would do well to document all material facts, faces, identities to serve as protection to (as you put it) cover their own ass. Intimidating/threatening journalists is the height of folly under the circumstances. It’s also cut from the same warp & weave as virtually every fascist/oppressive regime that ever existed. Not all journalists are going to share your sentiments/values. That’s the risk we all take when we enter the public arena. Moreover, journalists may not be as transparent as you’d like–ask the folks who were filmed netting dolphins…or ramming sick cows with forklifts…or Abu Graib (prison) for that matter. There’s plenty of examples of subjects being filmed in the midst of a newsworthy event without their knowledge/consent. You think the journalist who took the famous photo of the S. Vietnames officer summarily executing a young Viet Cong suspect with a pistol to the side of his head (the shot caught the moment of the bullet’s impact) ASKED the executioner for his ‘permission’ before he snapped the picture?? Your implication regarding a journalist needing to ‘protect their own ass’ simply compels most people to believe the Grand Jury investigations are justified.
    • Wombat Fancypants Fuck the law. If anyone in attendance doesn’t want the event to be filmed I will ask that the event not be filmed. If anyone feels they cannot respect a request to not film or photograph, as one of the panelists, I will ask you to leave the event.
      Yesterday at 8:50am via mobile ·  · 6
    • And I will report just that and document it as best I can. I serve as the eyes and ears of the public who have expressed an interest in this event. Some have said they’re unable to attend and hope to be able to see film of it after the fact. The proprietor (or their agent) of the private property has given permission. If you don’t want to be filmed or photographed at a public event, don’t show up. If you don’t feel you can abide by the law in public, I’d ask YOU to leave! You’re video taped and recorded every time you board a public bus around here, or enter many intersections for that matter. Deal with it! Your right to privacy doesn’t exceed anyone else’s, despite how radical your politics may be. Wear a ski mask, I don’t care. You don’t have the RIGHT to deny the public access to a public event. Reporting, filming, photographing, recording are all part of that access. Just what do you think makes you so special? You’re on video every time you walk into a courthouse. Complain if you like, but you won’t stop the practice there and you’re way out of bounds demanding it in any other public venue as well. Cops in this State have tried to prosecute people based on your theory, and they’ve been shut down by our appellate courts. Accept it and get on with what is. News coverage is part of our democracy. You’ve been forewarned there will be filming. Attend, or don’t. Mask your face, or don’t. Wear dark glasses, or don’t. It’s up to you. It is NOT up to you to bridle the civil right of others or the public.
    • Black Rose-Infoshop Someone should 86 this bro if he shows up, just saying.
      Yesterday at 8:20pm ·  · 1
    • Benjamin SittingBull This is why we as activists dont open up to the media, because of poor boundaries. I was involved in the Seattle and oly action and I will not be coming because of this insensitivity. The threat from the FBI is real and I dont want to mask up for this it presents a challenging image to the public. Mabey if you want to film you should ask people to be part of your own documentary instead of trolling anothers event
      Yesterday at 8:31pm ·  · 4
    • Benjamin SittingBull Thanks to those organizing even though this is coming up the event is a good idea..but please listen to us we are your actavist community and we are most deffinetly under threat and attack
      Yesterday at 8:37pm ·  · 1
    • Look, I’m not making a ‘movie’, I’m reporting a newsworthy event at a venue the public has been invited to. You’re right about one thing…you have an image problem with the public. (e.g. The comment and attitude Black Rose’s remark projects.) Journalists covering events during the trashing of Seattle streets on May Day were deliberately injured by some of the perpetrators. THAT is an ‘attack’ on the public and the public’s right to know what is going on in their city and midst. The irony of some radical elements claiming they’re under ‘threat and attack’ while threatening/attacking the eyes & ears of the public is so thick you can’t cut it with a knife. Government agents understand the PR mechanism at work. Clearly many of the most radical elements under scrutiny do not. The argument of not wanting to ‘mask up’ for fear of creating a confusing/negative image in the public’s mind is raised. But threatening/attacking/intimidating journalists is considered trivial. Think about it. If anything, the radical elements are their own worst enemies in this conflict between government and themselves. Solidarity? Hah!…with WHO? You don’t achieve ‘solidarity’ by smashing out people’s car windows and trashing their streets. Try reading Saul Alinsky’s RULES FOR RADICALS.
    • Black Rose-Infoshop Try reading go the fuck away doofus
    • Black Rose-Infoshop and boom goes the dynamite
      Yesterday at 9:58pm ·  · 1
    • Benjamin SittingBull If we wanted media why wouldn’t we have one of our trusted own create it instead of an out of town paralegal affiliate. Fuck this bs I’m out and passing that sentiment to my commerads if more do the same you won’t be filming anyone of importance and probably just each other so have fun.
      Yesterday at 10:00pm via mobile ·  · 1
    •  Amicus Curia It also comes to mind that those who act out such sentiments are largely responsible for putting their ‘friends’ and neighbors in the middle when those acquaintances are subpoenaed by the Grand Jury.
    • Because it’s not a PRIVATE venue! Public events do not get to pick and choose who covers it. They can invite who they like. But the right to cover public events belongs to the PUBLIC, not those who are the legitimate subjects of the public’s interest. It’s not a private press conference. It’s a public event where the public has been invited. To reiterate an earlier point–mainstream media is criticized for toadying up to corporate and government interests. Your answer: enlist your own toadies. A genuine reporter is INDEPENDENT of the subjects he/she is reporting on! (duh)
    •  Amicus Curia Why would you need a ‘public’ event to release your own propaganda?
    • Black Rose-Infoshop lolz we’ll see
      Yesterday at 10:06pm ·  · 2
    •  Amicus Curia How ironic this is posted under the title: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. When someone who does speaks of them, you’re quick to squelch the notion. Perhaps it should be titled: KNOW OUR RIGHTS (the ones WE choose, not yours)
    • Black Rose-Infoshop People should able to decide (especially if they are one of the speakers at this presentation) whether or not they want to be filmed. Despite everyone’s objections, you seem intent on pushing it which.. just guessing.. will end up with you getting kicked out.
      Yesterday at 10:09pm ·  · 3
    • Black Rose-Infoshop But do keep going, I bet you’re going to say you’re being oppressed next. I can’t wait.
      Yesterday at 10:11pm ·  · 2
    • I believe it was announced early on by Mike Coday there were plans to film this event. I don’t expect leopards to change their spots. I’ve read about the assaults on Tony Overman. I’ve read about the assaults on journalists covering the Seattle May Day demonstrations. None of the intimidation surprises me at this point. But it is being noted. I simply report what I hear and see. You’re the one with the story that needs to be told. Your reactions are predictable and ignore the fundamental truth that public events belong to the public. It’s not some proprietary movie right.
    •  Amicus Curia Tell ya what: Why don’t you try suing me for violating your copyright? 🙂
    • Black Rose-Infoshop errrday i’m lullzing
    • Benjamin SittingBull Uh smelling like fucking bacon in here I’m out for good peace
      Yesterday at 10:26pm via mobile ·  · 2
    • Yesterday at 10:28pm via mobile ·  · 1
    • Swaneagle Harijan 

      Sadly, the glaring LACK of support i am witnessing for those under scrutiny is damned dangerous. I am deeply disturbed by the widespread ignorance around the IMPORTANCE of well educated and supported activists which is failing to happen around Grand Jury hearings and especially for those subpoenaed. It is to the benefit of us all to have this event documented and available to everyone to see. The way Leah from Portland and her friend have made press releases and public statements about their position is the way to go. Hiding from the essential need to widely educate people is part of the suppression agenda. I find the lack of openness around all of this to be a indicator of just how effective suppression has become. Media Island is devoted to maintaining justice and truth. I have worked with them since the mid ’80’s. This should be supported, not reviled. Anyone who does not want to be filmed make sure you aren’t. We desperately need this information to get out there. Ignorance serves no one, especially those being targeted. I find many young activists to be highly undereducated and easily manipulated. This has to change.
      11 hours ago · Edited · 
    • I agree. I’ve asked Richard Fellows (a friend and client) to attend. I also agree with Pete Bohmer’s (a panelist and friend of 45 years) assessment that regardless of the nature of the allegations involved, the Grand Jury system *is* being 

      abused in this process. It’s being used for a fishing expedition. That’s not (in law) supposed to be allowed when a warrant is sought. The Grand Jury shouldn’t be used as a substitute for a fishing expedition that is prohibited by law. Addressing Harijan’s point: I invited a young disabled mother I’ve known all her life to this event. She asked what it was about. I told her it was to be a discussion of the issues surrounding the issuing of Grand Jury subpoenas to those being targeted and believed to be somehow connected to the property (“minor” according to Pete Bohmer) destruction and street violence in Seattle’s May Day demonstrations. Her immediate response: “I don’t know that I have a problem with that!” The lack of public support for those currently targeted, I’m finding, is stark. Members of that public are likely to end up on whatever criminal jury is selected for upcoming trials. The arrogance of some of the more radical elements at public events is their Achilles heel. It has been announced the event is public, that it will be filmed & documented. Many unable to attend have requested to view the film(s) of it for their own enlightenment and are supporters of those targeted. It’s probably a given the event will be attended by government agents who are busy scouring whatever intelligence they can gather–I doubt they’ll skip this one. Harijan is correct–at this point, transparency is more important (educating the public) than erroneous visions of ‘solidarity’. That’s done through MEDIA. Any genuine reporter isn’t going to give up editorial control to the subjects he/she is covering. Reporters are INDEPENDENT–or certainly should be. Objecting participants have been invited to disguise their identities. Some have refused. Another possibility might be very dim lighting or harsh back lighting so only their silhouettes might be seen on tape. I’m down with all that. I’m not down with only selected toadies being allowed to cover the news. My approach is I report what I see and hear (including here). I let the chips fall where they may. Having said that, given a choice (that doesn’t include stifling the news) I try to take steps to minimize the vulnerability of those exercising their 1st Amendment rights to attack. That doesn’t mean I’m a ‘co-conspirator’ or in ANYBODY’s camp. It just means that I’ll take steps to smudge a face or not use a person’s name (especially when politically targeted or vital to the person’s safety). So there’s room for all parties to be accommodated in this controversy. In the end, the public needs to be included in the dialogue else the government will manipulate its biases to the detriment of those seeking relief from a witch hunt.
      7 hours ago · 
    • Mike Coday Won’t film if folks oppose. Solidarity first!
      4 hours ago ·  · 5
    • Bekah Wolf Im not even in washington, but fyi Amicus is dead wrong: if they are a member of the press, they cant release publicly video of the event without consent of people filmed. Thats why (real) filmakers get release forms signed
      4 hours ago via mobile ·  · 3
    • Benjamin SittingBull Thanks mike! I want to be clear I think this is a good idea and I appreciate the people helping and organizing. I personally just feel put off when someone comes into my community and tells me and my friends “I’m going to film you deal with it” there is a more diplomatic consensual way to go about things that’s my point. Thanks to every one putting forth the effort
      4 hours ago via mobile ·  · 2
    • No Mike, perhaps a political radical’s mantra is ‘solidarity’. A journalist’s is the 1st Amendment. Bekah Wolf doesn’t know what she’s talking about. News footage film clips are made countless times every day without ‘releases’. We’re not talking about a ‘movie’ (at least I’m not) but news coverage. There is NO expectation of privacy in a public venue. Perhaps Bekah is unfamiliar with Washington State privacy laws and our courts’ interpretation of the same. I’m not. Nor do I, at this stage, feel like attending to Bekah’s remedial education on the point.
      4 hours ago · 
    • I’m put off by self styled activists who threaten and assault journalists. e.g. Tony Overman. This is cut from the same warp & weave. You get up on that gazebo stage in Sylvester Park to jam or make a speech, no member of the public requires a ‘release’ to film that. I also film stage events at Olympia’s farmers market, similarly without seeking ‘releases’. Sometimes I inform those who ask what I will be doing with the footage (posting it on a community/news blog). End of story (at least on this point). If you don’t get it, perhaps I can find time in the future to spell it out. Until then, search amicuscuria.com/wordpress and look for ‘photographers rights’ and other related search terms. There’s some great educational material there for the untutored from which many in this forum could clearly benefit.
      4 hours ago · 
    • Swaneagle Harijan Over recent years, many people have become uncomfortable with being photographed or filmed. I do believe those people have a right to not be. It is really important in these times to find ways to accomplish goals without being intrusive. Otherwise, the domination continues one way or another. Best plan is to have respect all around.
      4 hours ago ·  · 1
    • Swaneagle Harijan BUT the information NEEDS to get out there. Way late in coming at this point. Too many are in hot water with no info. Way too many.
      4 hours ago ·  · 1
    • Harijan, this ‘right’ by various subjects in a public venue you allude to NOT being photographed–care to cite your source and authority? Or is this just speculation on your part on how you’d order the world if you created it? Care to square that with all the other photos and video conducted in public (including public transportation, malls, streets, intersections, courthouses, banks, etc) that don’t require ‘releases’ or ‘permission’? I think the language in the 1st Amendment is clear enough on this point. If not, the case law certainly is.
      4 hours ago · 
    • Read the local anarchist web sites around the Puget Sound. They’re in hot water because of their arrogance surrounding public demonstrations and the few who chose to egregiously violate the law and the rights of others. That’s also the root

       of why so little sympathy, in general, is coming from the public in response to the machinations of the Grand Jury. Like my friend and the young mother said when informed about the issues and subpoenas targeting those suspected of involvement or being material witnesses, “I don’t know that I have a problem with that!” That *is* the overwhelming and abiding sentiment of the vast, vast majority of the public. You can remain in denial if you like, but those are the true facts.
      4 hours ago · 
    • Dana Walker A note on filming: If the Machine wants your picture they will get your picture. There’s no hiding from them anymore and our only defense is to get enough numbers that there are too many of us for them to do anything.
      3 hours ago · 
    • Swaneagle Harijan 

      All i am saying, with no authority other than my own experiences, that many people do not like being photographed whether it be traditional Indians, people who have been hideously abused or those who simply are not comfortable. That is all 

      i am talking about. Basic human respect which i agree is terribly lacking among the radicaler than thous who also lack openess and education around some pretty critical issues impacting their own DOT peeps.
      2 hours ago ·  · 1
    • Swaneagle Harijan 

      Overall, i am really sick of dogma dueling and competition among those humans who think they are right such as white males in Seattle who claim to be into nonviolence but are terribly racist and sexist which has as much to do with anything …See More
      2 hours ago ·  · 1
    • Swaneagle Harijan Respect is really essential for any kind of successful resistance to the forces killing all of life. Too many used to power of some sort trample anyone who doesn’t totally agree with them. So patriarchal, old, oppressive and time to call in basic human respect.
      2 hours ago ·  · 2
    • Sammy Harvell 

      I think that there are other means to get this information out. Saying that filming this event is the only way or that it’s so important that without it the information would be irrelevant is BS. Also I would be fine with filming the panel 

      with their consent or filming anyone for that matter with their consent, but your absolute refusal to not only hear and understand people but to respect them is appalling. People don’t trust you and they are right in that. Without trust of the people you sure will make a shitty journalist. Also I want to point out that journalism is never neutral. Every journalist has their own personal beliefs and opinions which no matter how hard they try, will taint their story. Your personal beliefs and opinions REEK in your responses. From things as varied as property damage to basic respect of others, to even your overall respect towards consent, to your absolute belief in the legal system. You are a man who sure loves your laws. People don’t sympathize to certain causes because society has brainwashed us into believing that if certain social norms are not kept, if people don’t do things a certain way they are bad. If everyone is doing X,Y,Z and you decide to do it W,O,X suddenly you are bad. So if you decide to use property damage to get heard instead of getting petitions signed and lobbying ect. you are the bad person. Just like if you are a poor person of color who can’t find work because the economy is bad and no one want’s to hire someone who’s brown. Welfare doesn’t pay all the bills. So you sell drugs or rob that bank and don’t hurt anyone but still get 10+ years cause the system and our laws are FUCKED UP. but you can’t see that cause you are all wrapped up in YOUR arrogant self and can’t accept the fact that people DON”T GIVE A SHIT if your feeling are hurt cause they don’t want you to film or that you feel like your RIGHTS are being violated. Just because it doesn’t say on a fucking little piece of paper doesn’t mean other people don’t have rights too. AND THE RIGHT TO CONSENT TO WHATEVER trumps you.
      2 hours ago · 
    • Emmeline Mead I don’t know that I’d have a problem with someone spraypainting this Amicus person’s camera lens. true fact.
      2 hours ago ·  · 2
    • 2 hours ago ·  · 1
    • 2 hours ago · 
    • Swaneagle Harijan Fabulously funny utmost necessity.
      2 hours ago · 
    • Sammy, it’s been said a reporter has no friends…or shouldn’t have if they’re any good. Moreover, I’ve come to the conclusion I DON’T WANT ANY ‘FRIENDS’ when I’m covering a story. You’re a good example of why not. ‘Friends’ make demands, want editorial control, and the journalist loses all objectivity they might otherwise have had along with any INDEPENDENCE. ‘Consent’ isn’t required to report/film or record an event in a public venue or where the private property owner has consented to such coverage. My ‘feelings’ have nothing to do with it. I could care less whether YOU (or anyone else) ‘likes’ me or my philosophy of journalism. Mike Wallace and Hunter S. Thompson are my journalistic idols. Wallace was the master of ‘ambush’ interviews or coverage. Thompson was the father of Gonzo journalism. We can agree or not about what’s ‘appropriate’, polite, ethical, or whatever. But the one defining boundary is our system of laws, which you apparently disdain. My beef with half-baked radicals is they seldom even have so much as a theory of government, much less understand it. We have laws and government because almost everyone except a select few elitists want them. There are far more effective methods for social/political change than assault, robbery, theft, and vandalism. But your argument smacks of justifying robbing the local liquor store because your poor old maiden aunt needs an operation or because you’re black/brown/red/yellow/female/poor/oppressed. And those who agree with you and acted on that belief in public are precisely why we’re where we’re at today with respect to the Grand Jury subpoenas. Or at least in part. Admittedly the Grand Jury is being used improperly for a fishing expedition and a tool of suppression. Still, I’m not your ‘authorized’ biographer, your ‘pal’, your co-conspirator, your propagandist, or your guest. I’m not invoking *my* right, but the public’s to cover a news event in a public forum. Your hostility to our system of laws is consistent with your scoffing at enshrined Bill of Rights guarantees. When you voice disgust at the flaws and corruption in our current system, what do you suggest? Are YOU (and your pals) an example of the alternative? Benjamin Franklin was possibly more concerned about the corruption in the people than the government itself when he responded, “A Republic, Madam…if you can keep it!” Sammy, you’re a classic example of the kind of corruption in the people Franklin worried about in a democracy.
      56 minutes ago · 
    • Emmeline, I’d have a problem with that and will have unannounced witnesses with me precisely because your threat is exactly the kind of assault launched on Tony Overman. In my view, Mr. Overman should have tackled his assailant and held them until the police arrived. Your advocacy of violence & assault is why most of the public is unconcerned what happens to you and those of your persuasion. It’s also why you, et ux, wish to hide your identities. Criminals always prefer the dark and anonymity. Your remarks belie the claims that those being investigated for the kind of acts you recommend are persecuted or ‘victims’ of the system. Peter Bohmer’s encouragement of young street demonstrators to attack Tony Overman has been roundly criticized and condemned by other professors at TESC. YOU (and those like you) are the true enemies, more than the system, of those rights and freedoms we still have. I denounce your suggestion and you for making it. If you attacked a journalist covering an event in a public forum, I’d condemn you for it. I condemn your rhetoric and what it implies about your character. It’s nothing more than urging criminal behavior.
      43 minutes ago · 
    • 28 minutes ago via mobile ·  · 1
    • Sammy Harvell 

      I’m just painfully aware of how oppression works in this country. Which you obviously aren’t. Not all laws or policies are created justly or fairly. I mean look at stop and frisk laws, or citizen united. And you make an assumption of a lot 

      of my politics and beliefs based on my very few responses to you. You have no idea who I am or my beliefs. You assume that I’m a radical or anarchist because I advocate for basic respect? Sweet! Then radicals and anarchists sound like my type of people. And you get pissed when people tell you that you won’t film (saying that folks control hungry or some shit), but we tried to dialog around it. People have said repeatedly that folks don’t mind as long as there is consent. But you are the one running up in this forum like a fascist elite prick, or a fucking cop telling us what is gonna go down in regards to filming. I get that the government films me all the time. I have no control over that. But I do demand respect from the people around me. And I do think that everyone has the right to protect themselves whatever that means is.
      26 minutes ago · 
    • Sammy Harvell but for real this guy is probably a cop.
      25 minutes ago ·  · 1
    • Sammy Harvell or at least really really painfully ignorant.
      25 minutes ago ·  · 1
    • Sammy Harvell we could just do some non violent stuff. Maybe bring a banner and make sure it’s infront of this guys camera at all times. I mean really what is he gonna do? shove us out of the way?
      23 minutes ago · 
    •  Amicus Curia No, just record what he/she sees, your comments & actions. Just as these comments are being posted on a community blog to serve as a warning just how physically dangerous is the environment and certain elements of the crowd. The ‘system’ doesn’t have to do very much given you appear to be your own worst enemies. Nobody is forcing you to attend this public forum. Yet you want to control it and the news coverage of it. There’s little enough difference in the sentiments expressed and any fascist government you care to name.
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

In Cold Blood:State Sponsored Terrorism

Individual Intrinsically Immoral/Illegal acts

State Sponsored Terrorism (including officially sanctioned mob violence) has a past predating recorded history. It is barbaric, shocking, and arguably counterproductive. How it is that we allow (and even urge) collective behavior/immorality (e.g. Torture) we would never tolerate as an individual act remains unexplained. 

State Sponsored Violence/Homicide Encouraged in Law:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

9-1-12 Oly Harbor Days Stage

Music for Dancing

A free concert on the Olympia Harbor Days Stage was offered to the public in the park adjacent to the city’s Community Center on Columbia St. Local talent and a variety of music was featured…sadly, no dancing on stage this year.

Oly Harbor Days Stage 1/8 – Convergence Zone Bluegrass

Oly Harbor Days Stage 2/8 – Convergence Zone Bluegrass

9-1-12 Oly Harbor Days Stage 3/8 – Freckles Brown Band

9-1-12 Oly Harbor Days Stage 4/8 – Freckles Brown Band

9-1-12 Oly Harbor Days Stage 5/8 – Momenti Rubati

9-1-12 Oly Harbor Days Stage 6/8 – Momenti Rubati

9-1-12 Oly Harbor Days Stage 7/8 – Momenti Rubati

Oly Harbor Days Stage 8/8 – Momenti Rubati

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

8-30-12 Music In The Park (Shelton)-Interfaith Community Choir

Once In A Blue Moon

Music In The Park (Shelton) – Interfaith Community Choir 1/4

Some corporate scam artists are speciously claiming copyright violation as a vehicle to use non-infringing (such as this one) video/news clips posted on Youtube as a billboard for THEIR ads, which they’re remunerated for. They’ll stoop to anything including claiming a one-legged homeless busker is violating their copyright by singing John Lennon’s IMAGINE. It’s be analogous to a photojournalist catching a police response to a homicide live then having to pull the footage from the air because some car radio driving by in the background is playing Hotel California. It’s, of course, absurd…and an abuse of the laws Congress enacted to protect genuine copyright infringement claims. Fair Use (such as this clip or the example cited) does not violate copyright. Our US Supreme Court has made this much clear.

Music In The Park (Shelton) – Interfaith Community Choir 2/4

As a courtesy to the producer and acknowledgment of the abuse of the digital Millennium Copyright Act’s take-down notice provision, do NOT buy any product advertised superimposed on this clip. Discourage the abuse.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only which includes criticism, comment, news reporting. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

FAIR DEALING EXCEPTION:
This Video is not for profit, It is shared/used for the purpose of research, criticism, review and news reporting under the fair dealing exceptions 29, 29.1 and 29.2 of the Canadian Copyright Act (R.S.1985 c, C-42)
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-c-42/latest/rsc-1985-c-c-42….

Music In The Park (Shelton) – Interfaith Community Choir 3/4

Music In The Park (Shelton) – Interfaith Community Choir 4/4

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is America Ready for a Rich White Man As President?

Ward Room columnist Edward McClelland often employs satire to make larger points. This is one of those times. Please read it with satire in mind.

Rich white men have done some great things for this country. Henry Ford, who was of Irish descent, popularized the automobile and provided his workers with a standard of living never before enjoyed by factory workers. John D. Rockefeller, a Franco-American, invented the modern oil industry. Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish immigrant, used his steel fortune to build beautiful libraries in small towns all over America.

I would never denigrate the contributions of rich white men to America. And I applaud the Republican Party for nominating one. But I’m not sure that means this country is ready for a rich white man as president. Why? First of all, the rich white male experience is very different from the experience of the average American. It is estimated that rich white men make up only one half of one percent of the U.S. population. Some would even say their lifestyle is alien to mainstream America.

Not only are rich white men far more likely to travel to foreign countries, many of them have homes in foreign countries. Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch, who is worth $8.3 billion, owns property in England, China and his native Australia. While only 22 percent of Americans fly on a plane every year, Murdoch owns his own Boeing 737. Murdoch also has six children by three different women, which is not unusual in rich white male culture. Actor/director Clint Eastwood, a rich white man who spoke on behalf of Mitt Romney at the Republican National Convention, has seven children by five women. Perhaps it’s a stereotype, but rich white men don’t share the values most of us consider essential to stable families.

It’s not Mitt Romney’s fault that he’s a rich white man. He comes from a long line of rich white men. His father, George, was president of the Americans Motors Corporation. His great-grandfather, Miles Romney, was a polygamist who was married to five women at once, an archaic rich white male practice which has been replaced by marrying five women in succession.

It’s possible that Americans will be seen as prejudiced if we don’t elect Romney, especially since he’s running against a half-black man who grew up in an apartment, and never lived in his own house until he was 44 years old. I think the time will come when we’re ready for a rich white man as president. In fact, I hope it happens in my lifetime. Perhaps Romney’s candidacy will pave the way for another member of his people. But I just don’t think he’s the right rich white man for the job.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

8-24-12 Journey to Oz:The Emerald City

Frozen Beauty

A celebratory annuity called for a pilgrimage. So it was that Seattle was chosen as the venue. With so many folks in one locale, they’re bound to find something entertaining to do with their time. Locals proved the maxim by making a good show of it.

With maps and schedules in hand, a route to Seattle Center was planned by way of MTA’s (Mason Transit Authority) Rte. 2 @ 6:50am in the nick of time and the stop on Wallace-Kneeland Blvd in front of Walmart. Yes, it can be caught by the Hwy 101 State salmon hatchery, but there’s no return trip as late as the 5:30-6:30pm Seattle-Bremerton ferry run to that more convenient point of embarkation. But MTA Rte. 1 *WILL* get you back to the Wal-Mart location shortly after 8:00pm. It works (except Sundays) as follows:

Rte. 1/Rte. 2 @ 6:50am to Belfair

Transfer to Rte. 3 @ 7:45am to Bremerton

Board 8:30am Bremerton-Seattle ferry

Board 9:45am Metro Rte. 16 @ Alaskan Way (ferry terminal) to Seattle Center (5th & Broad St.) for 7 hours of play time in Seattle.

Catch the 4:45pm Metro Rte. 16 @ 5th & Broad to ferry terminal. This will get you (maybe) to the ferry terminal by 5:05pm since this run keeps 20 minute intervals. The next one claims it would get you to the ferry terminal by 5:25pm, but this is cutting it a bit too close to catch the 5:30pm Seattle-Bremerton ferry since downtown traffic makes keeping the schedule difficult.

Since MTA Rte. 3 synchronizes its schedule with the ferry’s, it will be waiting for you @ 6:30pm when your ferry docks and you scurry to catch it before it leaves while you’re still walking in its direction upon  disembarking from the ship that delivered you. TIP: Call a couple of days ahead of time to MTA’s dispatch and insist they list you and your party’s name on a manifest the driver checks before leaving prematurely. The common sense epiphany of checking to see if passengers are BOARDING the newly arrived ferry before driving off seems lost on at least ONE MTA Rte. 3 driver. When she was asked what she would have done if the ferry had arrived 10 minutes late, she averred that had never happened and nobody had ever asked before. Nevertheless, on this date, the ferry indeed arrived 15 MINUTES late. The male driver on this date (exercising common sense) had not simply driven off leaving passengers stranded. This Rte. 3 run is the last of the day and changes its reader board to Rte. 1 on its arrival in Belfair. Staff at the MTA call center argued this would inconvenience passengers who MIGHT have an appointment, but everyone knows buses sometimes arrive a bit late–but that won’t make you nearly as tardy as missing the buss altogether. The male driver’s common sense, in this instance, trumped the call center’s potato head.

Finally, MTA Rte. 1 will deliver you back to the point (Walmart) where you caught Rte 2 earlier that morning. The transportation cost savings are enormous combined with the luxury of being able to sight see instead of gripping the steering wheel–not to mention the communal camaraderie often present on the bus. Besides, you already paid for this service through your county sales taxes. Use it! It’s free (inside Mason County) and only 50 cents for seniors going as far outside the County as Bremerton/Olympia.

Having covered the spectacular free (& huge: 27 stages, hundred of performances, 4 days of festivities) PNW Folkife Festival @ Seattle Center over the Memorial Day weekend, admittedly Seattle Center was a disappointment this day and seemed somewhat pedestrian. There was (for a king’s ransom) the King Tut exhibit at the Seattle Science Center, but even the glass art house display wanted plenty of do, re, mi. (Chihuly is nothing if not keenly aware of the commercial value of art.) Declining on the cost of membership/admission, a longer look at the various sculpture displays was in order. As it turned out, there were a number of buskers who proved as interesting, if not more so in the immediate sense, than King Tut.

In the process of arriving via Rte. 16, a rather comical incident between the driver and a young male passenger ensued. Apparently the driver had given the young man some instructions on how to get where he wanted to go. But he remained somewhat confused, asking for some clarification. “Did you listen to anything I said?” yelled the driver.  The young man’s mouth gaped. A few moments later, a woman asked how to get to the Pike Street Market. “I told you, they ALL stop by the Pike Street Market,” the Japanese looking driver fumed. The driver sounded very much like he might have been ‘over qualified’ for his job.

Robert, president of the Seattle Street Performer’s Guild
Busking for 35 years, likes his work, and names influential artists. He also speaks of the philosophy of his organization. (Street Arts & Buskers Advocates)

Ecuador’s Quichua Mashis play pan pipes, traditional Peruvian instruments. (1/3)

Ecuador’s Quichua Mashis play pan pipes, traditional Peruvian instruments. (2/3)

Ecuador’s Quichua Mashis play pan pipes, traditional Peruvian instruments. (3/3)

Amputee busker plays guitar, sings FLY AWAY

Amputee busker plays guitar, sings IMAGINE
(EMI Music Publishing claims videographer/he is violating their ‘copyright’)

Busker, Rick Fogel, plays Sculley’s Reel on the dulcimer (whamdiddle.com)

Busker, Rick Fogel, plays a blind Irish harper’s last tune written on his deathbed (whamdiddle.com)

Buskers Gregory Paul & his washboard sidekick play old time banjo tunes 1/3

Buskers Gregory Paul & his washboard sidekick play old time banjo tunes 2/3

Buskers Gregory Paul & his washboard sidekick play old time banjo tunes 3/3

Beautiful Statuesque Busking Mime wows the waterfront

My kind of gal and Ivers feeding the gulls

It was a great day to be alive. In the end, it wasn’t about the pay per view venues, it was about the people and the story each had to tell. The Emerald City had sprinkled fairy dust upon its children.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

State Sponsored Terrorism & Police Militarization @ Disneyland

Police Violence, Racialized Indifference and a Hunger for Justice in Anaheim

ANAHEIM POLICE SHOOT AT WOMEN AND CHILDREN, UNLEASH K-9 ATTACK DOG

Friday, 27 July 2012 09:53By Rania Khalek

Police Anaheim.A police officer keeps watch over fellow officers trying to disperse a group of people gathered in a parking lot where rioting had taken place the night before, in Anaheim, Wednesday, July 25, 2012. (Photo: Monica Almeida / The New York Times)

On Saturday, July 21, 24-year-old Manuel Diaz laid face down in a pool of blood, shot dead by Anaheim police just ten minutes away from “the happiest place on earth.” Anaheim, long known as home to Disneyland, has in the last week come to be defined by police violence and civil unrest.

It all started Saturday afternoon, when Diaz and two others were approached by three Anaheim police officers. Diaz ran and one of the officers chased after him. According to a witness, Diaz was shot from behind, first in the buttocks, then the head. She also told reporters that police proceeded to handcuff Diaz before searching him, despite his body lying bloody and motionless on the ground. Several witnesses also accused police of trying to buy cell phone recordings of the incident.

Days later, the OC Weekly obtained a cell phone video that showed police standing over Diaz’s bloodied body, which appears to be twitching as if still alive, for over three minutes and doing nothing. One man can be heard pleading, “He’s still alive man!”

Diaz is just the latest in a long line of police shootings of unarmed people of color. His name has come to symbolize the ongoing struggle against police violence in poor black and brown communities, for which authorities are almost never held to account. In Anaheim, where tension between police and the Latino community has been building for years, Diaz is the match that lit the fire which has spread throughout the city.

His shooting sparked an immediate protest by area residents who demanded answers from police. When some in the crowd allegedly hurled bottles and rocks at officers, police responded by shooting rubber bullets and pepper spray and releasing (apparently by accident) a K-9 attack dog into the crowd of mostly parents and small children. The chaos was captured on video by a KCAL news crew showing screaming mothers and fathers shielding their children in horror.

The following day a second Latino man, 21-year-old Joel Acevedo, was shot and killed by Anaheim police, who said Acevedo was shot after firing at police during a foot chase.

These latest deaths bring the total number of Anaheim officer-involved shootings in 2012 to six. Families of the victims have been holding weekly Sunday protests directed at the Anaheim Police Department (APD), who in a court filing, they likened to “a death squad” that indiscriminately targets anyone they believe is a gang member.

They’re All “Gang Members”

Police violence is overwhelmingly limited to two groups of people: political demonstrators (i.e. Occupy Wall Street, Chicago #NoNATO protests etc); and poor communities of color.

Of the six victims of Anaheim police-involved shootings this year, five were Latino. In fact, the Anaheim neighborhood where Diaz was shot is almost 90 percent Latino.

At news conferences and in statements to the press, Anaheim police have repeatedly used the term “gang member” in justifications for the recent shootings and subsequent treatment of protesting residents.

Anaheim Police Chief John Welter has said that the firing of bean bags and pepper spray at residents protesting the killing of Diaz was in response to “some known gang members”  throwing bottles and rocks at officers.

In a detailed statement released by the Anaheim Police Association on July 24, Kerry Condon, president of the police union, said the following:

“… we live in a dangerous world where there are too many violent gang members like Manuel ‘Stomper’ Diaz and Joel ‘Yogi’ Acevedo who spent their young lives wreaking havoc on their neighborhoods and the law-abiding citizens who live there. It was the actions of these gang members, not the police officers, who set these unfortunate events in motion.

“Even though there have been several death threats to Anaheim police officers in gang neighborhoods throughout the city of Anaheim in the last year, our officers continue to go into these areas to fight gang crime and protect the residents who continue to live in fear of these domestic terrorists.”

Gustavo Arellano, editor of Orange County’s alternative newspaper the OC Weekly, which has been closely reporting on APD brutality for years, told Truthout that identifying the victims as “gang members” is nothing new. “Police departments are notorious for never voluntarily offering information to reporters, but they’re quick to tell the media that ‘this is no angel, it’s a documented gang member.'”

The problem, he said, is, “The media only pays attention to what the police department has to say, as though that justifies the shooting deaths of these people.”

The reality is that “gang” is a racialized word that triggers images of violent black and brown criminal stereotypes in the minds of the public. When the words “gang” or “drugs” are thrown around in connection to victims of color, sympathy for the injured and/or dead comes to a sudden halt. By repeatedly using “gang member” to describe the people at the other end of police violence, the APD is soliciting racialized indifference toward the victims.

For confirmation of the success of the ploy, one may look to the lack of concern for Chicago’s latest scourge of gun violence. The more than 250 homicides in 2012 alone – up 40 percent from this time last year – have been blamed on guns, gangs and drugs, while the systemic problems created by the War on Drugs and police tactics have been largely ignored along with the victims.

Contrast the apathy at Chicago’s rising body count with the horrified reaction to the movie theater massacre in Aurora, Colorado. As politicians competed over who could pray harder for the victims and their families, the media saturated the airwaves with detailed stories about the lives of those who were killed. President Obama even traveled to Aurora to meet with survivors. Meanwhile, Chicago’s victims and their grieving families have yet to receive any public level of sympathy and concern.

At Tuesday’s City Council meeting, an Anaheim attorney, James Segall-Gutierrez, told the council members, “The dehumanization of a man by calling him a gang-banger is wrong. He is a human being.” He went on to argue that the deaths of Diaz and Acevedo were the “end result” of this dehumanization, adding, “it will continue until you change it.”

Economic Apartheid

While Arellano recognizes race as a component of police harassment, he believes economic inequality is at the heart of police violence. “The Latino community is being most affected by police harassment because they live in the more working class communities, which naturally have more crime. Police are more likely to look for people to arrest in those communities. It’s a class issue that goes beyond the Latino community.”

Atef A., an Anaheim student at Chapman University, told Truthout that the latest police violence in Anaheim has exposed the true face of Orange County. He said that television shows like “Laguna Beach” and “The OC,” which portray Orange County as “leafy, upper middle class” are an “illusion.” “We have economic apartheid in Orange County,” he said.

“There is gang violence,” admitted Atef, “but it has to do with the social system not providing for impoverished neighborhoods.”

In one of the only articles to address Anaheim’s economic inequality, The Los Angeles Times reported:

“Of the city’s estimated 340,000 residents, 53% are Latino and the protests have occurred in the city’s flatlands, where many of those residents live. Most City Council members hail from the more affluent Anaheim Hills neighborhood to the east. The American Civil Liberties Union recently filed suit claiming the current at-large system of electing the council leaves Latinos poorly represented. The suit said that Anaheim has had only three Latino council members in its history.”

Arellano believes the City Council is to blame even more than the police department for the violence afflicting Anaheim. “They’ve been giving billions in subsidies to developers, the 1%. When the city council pays attention only to developers the rest of city crumbles.” He said that the City Council has diverted resources to hotels, resorts and sports convention centers to the detriment of the city’s working poor, who are already suffering from unemployment and a spike in crime.

Anaheim resident Steve Sevada echoed Arellano’s sentiment at Tuesday’s City Council meeting. “Maybe if you didn’t give all the money to developers, you wouldn’t have kids involved in gangs,” Sevada said. Another Anaheim resident suggested that the City council “Invest in Anna Drive and Ponderosa Park as if they were resort districts,” referring to the neighborhoods where Manuel and, in March, Martin Angel Hernandez, were killed by police.

A War Zone

On Tuesday, July 24, Anaheim residents converged in front of City Hall to demand accountability for the police violence plaguing their community. After seven hours of protest, the night ended with 24 arrests, several injuries, and streets littered with used beanbag rounds and pepper-ball casings.

The tension between police and demonstrators grew with each passing hour. Swarms of riot police immediately lined up along the front of the Civic Center building to block protesters from entering. After attempting to break through, only to be pushed back by heavily armed officers, protesters took their march down the streets of Anaheim, chanting, “Fuck the Police” and, “No justice. No Peace. No racist police.”

Meanwhile, inside City Hall, one Anaheim resident after another addressed the council members about the latest round of police-involved shootings. “I’m a mother with small children. This city used to be calm. Now we have to be afraid of people that are supposed to protect us,” a local woman told the council. “We would like to have greater access and transparency to what police do in our community,” added a local man who identified himself as Arturo Ferrerez.

Throughout the evening, the APD was joined by five surrounding police agencies for the dispersal of protesters.  and it was observed that the police more closely resembled a military special operations unit on a mission in Iraq than American law enforcement containing a demonstration. The Associated Press reports there were as many as 250 police officers in total throughout the night.

As the evening progressed, protesters hurled rocks and bottles at police while police shot at protesters indiscriminately with beanbags and pepper balls. It’s not clear which side initiated the exchange, however, nearly every media report has pinned the blame on violent and unruly protesters.

Several people were seen with large bloody welts on their bodies, one man hit in the back of the head as he tried to run for cover. Journalists were shot at as well, including well-known live-streamer Tim Pool, investigative journalist Amber Lyonand members of southern California’s KFI News staff.

“Do We Need to Start a Riot?

The history of police violence toward Latinos is not isolated to Anaheim. Similar stories of police violence can be found all across the country in areas populated by poor people of color.

During Tuesday night’s protest, an unarmed black man in Dallas, Texas, was shot and killed while running away from Dallas police. Riot police from seven Dallas substations were called in to subdue the crowd of 300 residents that gathered to vent their anger at police.

The Malcolm X Grassroots Movement (MXGM) recently published an investigation, which found that 120 black men, women and children have been killed by police, security guards or self-appointed law enforcers in the first half of 2012, the majority of whom were unarmed. That’s one black person killed every 36 hours. Given the string of Latinos killed by police in Anaheim alone, the number would possibly have risen dramatically had the MXGM report counted all people of color.

One of the report’s most damning findings is the sheer lack of accountability for these killings. Thus far, less than 9 percent of those responsible for the deaths have faced charges (four police officers and six security guards and self-appointed law enforcers).

The report’s authors go on to describe the common pattern of events that take place in the aftermath of a police shooting:

“The standard procedure in most jurisdictions is for police involved in fatal shootings to be given paid ‘desk-duty’ while the department conducts an investigation of itself. The press applauds their fine records while it screams about the criminal records of the deceased. Almost all killer cops are routinely exonerated and quickly return to the street. Grieving families who invariably ask the modest question, ‘why did he have to die?’ are ignored. If there is some demonstrated community outrage the case may be further investigated. The legal system almost never charges these executioners and even if they do, the killing continues.”

Anaheim Mayor Tom Tait has promised a transparent investigation into the death of Diaz. He’s also requested that the state attorney general and FBI assist in the investigation. However, to date, not a single Anaheim police officer has been prosecuted for the rising number of fatal shootings.

In response to the MXGM report, rapper Jasiri X took to the microphone to ask, “Do We Need to Start a Riot?,” the title of his recently released song and video, which address the lack of justice for the deceased.

If city officials continue to excuse and ignore the persistence of deadly police violence, the streets of Anaheim, desperate for justice, may soon be asking the same question: “Do we need to start a riot?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

8-23-12 Music In The Park (Shelton) – ‘The Teachers’

This next to the last free concert in the season’s series was composed of Paul Barber on the electronic keyboard and guitar, Ron Grinnell on drums and trumpet. Both, as it so happens, are teachers at the Choice High School in Shelton. Their music is eclectic–rooted in many of the popular songs from the mid-20th century, the 60’s, 70’s & 80’s. All were familiar to the seniors and residents of Alpine Way in their audience.

Paul & Ron sometimes play at the nearby Hoodsport Winery. Their music is relaxing and fundamentally melodious with an occasional jazz number thrown in the mix. Paul served as lead and provided his own mixing from the stage. Some of Paul’s vocals were almost a dead ringer for the original, others…not so much. His performance on the keyboard was masterful. His side man (Ron) would shine if given the lead for a few trumpet solos where he clearly excels. Paul teaches the required curricula at Choice but occasionally has the opportunity to teach music to its students.

8-23-12 Music In The Park (Shelton) – ‘The Teachers’ 1/4

8-23-12 Music In The Park (Shelton) – ‘The Teachers’ 2/4

8-23-12 Music In The Park (Shelton) – ‘The Teachers’ 3/4

8-23-12 Music In The Park (Shelton) – ‘The Teachers’ 4/4

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @ Hiawatha Park (W. Seattle)

Bangles & Baubles

Our annual journey to a photographer’s/videographer’s paradise begins in the Olympic Mountains of Mason County via Rte. 2 (or Rte. 1 if you’re in Shelton) of the MTA connecting to Rte. 3 in Belfair which is synchronized with the Bremerton-Seattle ferry run.

Dancing: Good for the Soul

You’ll need to catch the 6:50am bus, though, if you want to get about 7 hours of play time with the 8:30 ferry to Seattle before catching the 5:30pm return ferry and the last MTA bus to get you back where you started.

CAVEAT: The MTA Rte. 3 bus driver didn’t think it was important enough to check to make certain all passengers had disembarked from the 6:30pm ferry (even though many were still walking off the boat when she put her coach in gear AND LEFT at least one stranded!) before leaving the Bremerton ferry terminal. This necessitated an emergency Taxi cab (an additional $22 fare) to catch the errant driver halfway to Belfair. SO—be extra critical and remind the bus driver to alert dispatch you WILL be returning the same evening on the 5:30pm-6:30pm Seattle-Bremerton ferry run or you risk being left in the lurch at dockside. Also, if you had the foresight to include the MTA’s tel. # on your cell phone, call dispatch IMMEDIATELY to alert them the driver has abandoned you. The MTA office is closed, of course, @ 6:30pm, but word has it that if you wait and dial ZERO (like the bus service you’re getting), it will roll over to dispatch, which actually stays behind the scenes available to drivers until the last one returns ~8:00pm (except on Sunday when no bus service can be had in Mason County, unlike King County).

Riders should urge the MTA to require the Bremerton run bus driver actually walk the few feet to the terminal and LOOK to see if the ferry is allowing new passengers to board. If not, the MTA bus should wait at dockside until it DOES! It’s not like, being the last run, it’s going to miss ANY connections!!

Bookends

Medfest (for Mediterranean Festival) has been an ongoing popular free (to you, anyway) event for more than 25 years featuring ‘belly dancing’, music, beautiful women of all ages, stripesj & sizes (and the rare male belly dancers too) along with so much color in the plethora of costumes as to make your retinas burn.

Some of the younger women have figures to kill for while others are simply beautiful with their belly dancing hearts on display. While the still shots capture details and the splendor of their costumes, the video clips bring a kind of magic the still camera cannot: When the ladies begin to dance, THEY ARE ALL BEAUTIFUL!–I kid you not. It’s like the belly dancing godmother sprinkled fairy dust on them. A magical transformation takes place the viewer can’t help but notice.

This extravaganza goes on for the full weekend (Saturday & Sunday) beginning at 11:00 (So there’s time to make your buss connections from the downtown ferry terminal and get to the festival in time to grab a chair else you’d better be bringing your own because the venue is absolutely packed.) Every other member of the audience (or more) will have a camera in hand. The front row has the best camera angles, but you’ll need to arrive early for that.

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 1/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 2/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 3/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 4/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 5/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 6/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 7/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 8/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 9/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 10/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 11/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 12/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 13/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 14/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 15/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 16/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 17/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 18/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 19/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 20/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 21/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 22/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 23/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 24/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 25/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 26/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 27/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 28/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 29/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 30/31

7-21-12 Belly Dancing (Medfest) @Hiawatha Pk (W Seattle) 31/31

The event comes complete with a thicket of vendor booths selling every imaginable custom designed costume, jewelry, and otherwise impossible to find artisan creations that would win the fancy of just about any woman who has wanted to dance. There are TWO (2) stages, an outdoor one and an indoor (gymnasium) one going full tilt simultaneously. It’s a family venue with many teens and children present. This kind of celebration is easily worth $50/ticket, but it has always been free to the public. It is held in a public (Hiawatha Community Center) park located at California Ave. SW, and SW Lander St. in West Seattle. There are showers and locker rooms for the performers. The organizer’s name is ‘Babs’ and you should contact her to make arrangements for when you or your groups will perform. Bab’s receives no compensation for her commitment, but she does arrange to pay the Center a sum (from vendor’s fees) for the weekend use of it. There’s no fee for performers–all are welcome. But the competition is uniformly impressive.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment