The Olympian flagged/censored the following observations made in their comment section following the referenced article they ran in their publication on 3-8-13. Fortunately, they cannot censor it here. WE ARE NOW THE MEDIA!
Democracy Wall
The Olympian newspaper had a disturbing article about the City’s proposed ‘expansion’ of the Artesian well site on its front page today. It included a diagram/blueprint with a raised stage, movie screen, ping pong table, tiled emulated waterway art walk, steel arch entrance emblazoned with Artesian Court, and an awning designed to keep all dry except the homeless (the awning will be retracted and locked at night, presumably along with any public restroom facilities) promising to buoy up the City’s aspirations by ‘managed positive behavior’ (apartheid?)–a hallmark of Olympia’s public policy track record.
Jesus Calling Card
Homeless Youth
Go Ask Alice
Yet another brick in the wall of Olympia’s march to becoming a gated city/community is afoot. The gentrification of the Artesian will complement the apartheid ordinances targeting the homeless, the poor, the dispossessed as personas non grata. Consider what Dave Okerlund’s vision of an ‘Artesian Court’ [pun intended?] arcade-like environment where “a combination of active & passive uses designed and managed to promote POSITIVE BEHAVIOR” means in a town which, until recently, restricted free speech to ‘busking zones’, and where its community center (Olympia Center) has ‘no loitering’ signs posted on its walls. The plethora of obnoxious signs in its transit center are similarly hostile, announcing bikes left in its racks have been vandalized, yet promising they will be seized if left over 24 hours. The transit authorities are unwilling to accept any responsibility for protecting the bicycles of its patrons, but they’re more than willing to steal them. Downtown Olympia has empty streets and a sterile atmosphere after dark.
A Pledge In Infamy
“Managed Positive Behavior”
Dogs, Yes–Homeless, No!
Hobophobia?
If the City’s track record of managing by crisis and discrimination (busking ‘zones’, cruising ordinances, anti-‘camping’ ordinances, persecuting the homeless, locking people with no home but the streets out of public bathrooms, etc.) is a measure of its corruption/incompetence, citizens would be well served to avoid more of the same in its proposed gentrification of the Artesian well site. The white middle class arrogant ignorance of characterizing the site as currently “under-used” is deafening. The Artesian is, by far, the most popular City natural resource 24/7 and always has been. Its friends are legion. Besides water, it has been observed food donations are often left there. Street activists often use it as a meeting place to organize/stage events/protests. Art works have been created on site and a sense of ancient community watering holes permeates the place. All who come share the universal need for water to sustain life. Like death itself, water can serve as a great leveler in the quest for life…or it can become yet another commodity in the furtherance of greed and middle class ennui. This is what Mr. Okerlund’s proposal represents–an ode to capitalism and a cathedral to ‘managed positive behavior’ as one walks beneath the steel arch entrance to the ‘Artesian Court’. Perhaps a sign with more genuine language may be posted there: No Homeless Allowed–Homeless, keep off the grass!
Landed Gentry Welcome
Now You See It
“Under Used”?
Predictably, the resentment toward this furtherance of gentrification and apartheid within the City limits will become pronounced. This invited resentment will inevitably be expressed in the form of tagging and vandalism. The City’s newest gilded thumb in the eye of the poor, the homeless, the downtrodden, will become a target, a perverse ‘democracy well’ with the words of its prophets written on the walls. Dave Okerlund’s proposed gentrification of the Artesian is akin to dressing your 10 year old daughter up in hot pants and directing her to hang out on the street corner at night. It is not a responsible proposal. It should be firmly rejected as based on a vision conceived by one with middle class blinders ignorant of the Artesian’s current unique value and use by ALL of the community, not merely the ones favored by the City and its minions.
Failure to recognize oppression/victims requires only their sufferance of the same offense long enough.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!”
–Samuel Adams–
“More Weight!” -Giles Corey-
Katherine ‘KteeO’ Olejnik
Matt Duran
Kerry Cunneen
Olympia’s Grand Jury Resisters Matt Duran and Katherine Olejnik were released on 2-28-13 pursuant to a court order signed by federal judge Richard Jones. Maddy Pfeiffer remains incarcerated since having been taken into custody the day after Christmas, 2012. Portland’s Grand Jury Reisister, Kerry Cunneen, remains at large, having refused to appear to respond to a subpoena to testify before the same federal grand jury reasoning it would be a step in the direction of assisting the state in incarcerating yet another (A)narchist (herself) for little more than sharing a political philosophy w/friends & acquaintances while refusing to identify them.
Judge Jones based his ruling on the failure of the federal prosecutor to rebut the Resisters’ motion-affidavit contending their resolve to refuse to give up names of fellow philosophical travelers was unshaken and would remain so. The judge was considerably less impressed by the detainees’ argument characterizing the federal grand jury’s investigation, future course, or collateral prosecution of suspects than their personal statements about their confinement (solitary), their principles, and the reasons they will never provide testimony.
Besides the 5 months of their incarceration, much of which had been in solitary confinement, the court took note of the resulting injury to their physical & mental health, loss of employment, housing, relationships–all while being cut off from the world (even other inmates/staff) except for one 15 minute phone call per month. No explanation for their placement in solitary confinement (a disturbingly brutal environment) was ever forthcoming from the prison administration where they were held (Sea Tac federal detention center). The internal scars they bear merit respect and protest from their peers.
PIE! In the sky or by and by,
We want pie until we die.
Whang dang doodle!
A treat not always sweet,
And better than strudel. I have a mama and I love her dear, But when I crave pie the choice is clear: Hoosier Mama is the holy mother, When it comes to crust there is no other. Buttery, rich, and oh-so sinful, I’m known to eat it by the tinful. Seasonal fruits, berries galore, She shops the market for what’s in store. Classic apple, chocolate cream, Ginger custard is supreme. But if your tooth is not so sweet, Mama’s got a savory treat. Meat hand pies — you’ll need no fork, Stuffed with tasty seasoned pork, Or maybe beef or local lamb, Either way, it’s a grand slam. If you’re clad in spandex or a roomy shirt, And enjoy sipping your dessert, Order a pie shake from Mama P, Available for the second time only. She’ll take some pie — it’s eater’s choice, Add some ice cream (hail, rejoice!), Throw it in a whirring blender, Proving her prowess as a vendor. Voila le pie shake in all its glory, And thus we end this pastry story. The moral here is no surprise: Be good to your mama and bad to your thighs.
Food/$ Welcome
Olympia’s Bakers Guild held their annual Pie Fest–a fund raiser to benefit the area’s homeless and hungry. Several local organizations donated items such as a cutting board, cheese plate, rolling pin, pie server, wooden whale, gift certificates, grocery gift certificates, hot pads, towels, oven mitts, apple corer, measuring cups, wines, George Foreman grill, lighted wine bottle, golf balls, consultations, books, toys, soaps, lotions, candles, loofa, and many gift certificates.
High Spirits
Olympia’s Mayor Stephen H. Buxbaum made a cameo appearance, announcing the last Saturday of February would henceforth be Olympia’s PIE DAY and Pie would was hereby declared to be its official food.
Raffles, Pie Auctions & such
After the Pie extravaganza, organizers estimated $3,000 was raised along with the community’s consciousness.
Traffic Jam
Though attendance was high (well above the fire code rating of 81 for room occupancy) and the serving line long, it moved quickly.
$85 bid takes Apple Pie
Suspense rose with the bidding. The auctioneer successfully cajoled new heights in generosity.
Master of Ceremonies
The auctioneer’s hypnotic performance opened the room’s wallets.
$85 Apple Pie Stirs Hearts, Taste Buds
$115 Rasberry-Pomegranate Grand Prize Pie Breaks Record
Buskers Struggle, Grace Olympia’s Streets
Itty Bitty String Band ‘stuck’ in Olympia’s street scene, Clint & Sophie look forward to better times. Buskers are no longer harassed after the City Council decided to rescind a local ordinance which made this form of free speech illegal.
Raffle Winner
Afterglow
Gift Basket Raffle
Table Side Entertainment
Pierista
Interlude
The Pierequisite is…
Raising the Ante
Singing for Supper
Madonna & Child
Last Set
The City’s Mean Streets
But, having started on such a high note, it couldn’t last. The mood segued after visiting the Rajyoga India presentation in an adjacent room–deteriorated…resonating to the chilly mood and concertina wire erected by Oly’s masters.
Oly Community City Welcome Mat
Reminiscent of 20th century poverty laws like vagrancy and hitchhiker harassment, the visible antagonism toward the destitute was at odds with a town whose merchants would like to welcome shoppers/visitors.
‘Community’ Center?
Linda Oestreich, Director, was contacted at home and questioned about the sign, it’s implications, and who made the decision to mount it on the center’s wall. She referred to the facility as the ‘community center’ during the interview. She conceded no community input was sought before the sign went up. Linda admitted she had made the call and felt it wasn’t sufficiently significant to seek input from the community or allow those affected by the decision to participate in it.
Oly Inc. Turf
Ms. Oestreich accepted the notion the center belonged to the public (or at least the City of Olympia) but insisted only visitors enrolled in a formal program or project being hosted within were welcome to socialize on the premises. Others would be allowed to pass through on the way to a destination so long as they did not tarry–much the same policy as the downtown public transportation center invokes.
Underclassman
When this on duty staffer was asked how long the ‘loitering’ sign had been posted, he ventured 6-8 months. Ms. Oestreich asserted it had been up much longer. She seemed nonplussed when asked what message she thought the sign conveyed to the public, but defended it as ‘necessary’ without offering specifics or a compelling reason why, while allowing the fact homeless denizens routinely use the facility’s showers @ 25 cents for 2 minutes of hot water.
The staff person became visibly nervous when pressed about the reasons/implications regarding the obnoxious sign, handing this reporter Ms. Oestreich’s business card and contact info with the suggestion questions be directed to her.
Raw Meat
With ‘KEEP BACK’ warnings posted for pedestrians who might venture too close to the K9 police cruiser, another symbol of the fortress mentality endemic in a government supposedly ‘of the people, by the people, and for the people’ was apparent. This siege defense policy has begun to transform our very cities, like Olympia, into virtual gated communities. An important distinction, however, is unlike residential gated communities, the City’s holdings are PUBLIC! They belong (in theory) to the public for the purpose of benefiting that public, even the least of us. Yet the fear & loathing is palpable on the mean streets of Olympia.
Gandy Dancer
DIY Cabby
This cabby, when questioned on what the going wage rate was, responded he easily made more than from his regular job as a truck driver on weekdays. He leases the taxi for $50/day, keeping all fares he collects.
Busking Wholesalers
This down & out hard scrabble busking couple sing for their supper, but also sell clothing items to the Dumpster Used Clothing Store behind them to survive. When asked if they had a website, the woman laughed and confided they were homeless.
Cut Me, I Bleed
These store window signs protesting cost cutting measures which leave the most vulnerable exposed, explain the new municipal ordinance virtually criminalizing the homeless and directing them to a handful of outlying shelters where they may or may not be admitted–if there’s room, depending on what issues the applicant has and how amenable they are to authority structures.
After The Gold Rush
Still secured by an impregnable lock, this bike frame has been stripped of all essential parts. Bicyclists seeking a more publicly visible safer storage venue are threatened with signs announcing their property will be seized by the City Transit Authority after 24 hours…a chapter reminiscent of the one just played out by Olympia’s homeless youth seeking a modicum of safety on the City Hall steps adjacent to the police station downtown.
Fit To Be Tied
All types of undesirable artifacts end up polluting the City streets when rubbish bins and public bathrooms are inconveniently located or unavailable. Worse than the visual pollution is the threat to public health.
Bong Haven
What Is It?
The owners would squirm if their downtown Olympia retail business was described as something as archaic as a ‘head shop’. 20th century colloquialisms aside, Fire & Earth is located on Franklin between 5th & State Ave. near the downtown public bus terminal. Its posted signs spell out, for the uninitiated, its wares are strictly for legal substances and they discourage/refuse service to those under 18. The staff was friendly, and sophisticated about the legal landscape affecting their business, including the entrapment not so long ago by the feds of Tommy Chong for the alleged unlawful interstate sale of ‘drug paraphernalia’. Mr. Chong entered a negotiated plea in order to free his family (sons) from the cross hairs of federal aparatchiks.
Table Lamps?
All the glassware are the creations of local artists.
Fear & Loathing
A few steps from the welcoming atmosphere in Fire & Earth awaited the antagonistic embrace of the Intercity Transit Center.
Signs, Everywhere A Sign
There wasn’t a whole lot a person could do according to the signs. The men’s room was out of commission and although a fair number of folk were sitting, waiting for Godot, there was little/no conversation overheard.
Unsafe At Any Speed
Unwilling to protect the bikes, Intercity Transit *is* willing to steal them.
Midnight Bike Parts
A thriving black market exists in Olympia’s tenderloin district and underclass.
Mass Transit Memorial
Patriarchy In Action
Gents might want to consider bringing an empty peanut butter jar when venturing downtown–or cross dressing.
Women: Good to Go
Women’s bathroom kept under surveillance, the men’s…being distinctly uninteresting…less so.
Fare Creep
As fares increase, Intercity Transit has cut service. As mass transit twists slowly in the wind, the State’s legislature considers a bill levying a new tax on bicycles.
Oly’s Pagan Nightlife
Missing Pet
City’s Homeless Connection
Intercity Transit may find new demand for this connection in the wake of Olympia’s new anti-poverty law targeting the homeless sleeping in public spaces. Camp Coyote is located in the vicinity of the Family Courthouse.
Cruising
A City, not all of whose residents now sleep lawfully at night, keeps on trucking. The question of whose streets they are remains unresolved. The increased polarization continues unabated.
The Love
Storefront vacancies experience exponential growth while the City uses the homeless as a straw man.
Property Tax Break
Zeigler’s has become a tradition over the years as virtually the only welding shop in downtown Olympia.
Senior Ghetto
Unlike some mixed neighborhoods, Olympia’s senior ghetto is sterile with little street presence of its members sealed behind locked doors. The nearby senior center has a ‘no loitering’ policy prohibiting socializing on the premises according to its director, Ms. Oestreich, unless enrolled in a formal program hosted by the facility. This may make the transitioning of its residents to nursing homes feel more familiar. The City has succeeded in greasing the skids to the graveyard–an efficiency that might have brought Hitler to tears.
City of Shelton administrator Dave O’Leary has raised the alarm that an army of bikini clad baristas are plotting an invasion of our schools, parks, libraries, churches, day care centers, and residential areas. “We’ve got Pool…right here in River City! Pool–yes POOL. That starts with ‘P’ which rhymes with ‘T’ and stands for Trouble.” [Citizens begin to hyperventilate: “Trouble, trouble, trouble, trouble…”] -The Music Man-
Bikini-clad baristas are causing a stir across Washington state, where some love the scantily-clad coffee servers, but others have complained on moral grounds. Mind you, no such espressos stands have ever actually set up shop or applied for a license in Shelton, but one can’t be too careful when it comes to the slippery slopes of a moral dilemma.
Randi Dameri
An army of bikini clad baristas marching on our schools, libraries, and parks from their “sexually oriented espresso stands” according to Dave O’leary, City administrator. Thus, the City, alarmed by the lack of a dress code protecting us from such a calamity, seeks a ‘moratorium’ (akin to a black hole’s event horizon) prohibiting any such testing of the limits of personal expression under a Mayor who ran on getting government off the backs of local business.
If the City is going to impose a dress code on one business, perhaps it should impose it on all businesses (bars, restaurants, night clubs, health spas, gyms, theaters, dance halls, fashion shows) including patrons. A hearing on the proposed ordinance will be held @ 6:00pm, 3-18-13. Concerned citizens are urged to show up shirtless (male), or bikini clad (female/male)…especially if you’re young and attractive. The Mason County geriatric set could use some stimulation beyond oyster shucking. Could the espresso stand (or bar, restaurant, night club, etc.) have a large Video screen with bikini clad baristas on display?
“Moratoriums are legal.” -Mayor Gary Cronce- [They’re also a tool to manipulate the law/Constitutional rights…not that the City would stoop to something so devious.]
Who Knew? 2005 Wasn’t Long Enough to Wake UP & Smell the Coffee!
A bikini barista is a person who prepares and serves coffee drinks while dressed in scanty attire such as a bikini or lingerie. This marketing trend (sometimes referred to as sexpresso or bareista) developed in the Seattle, Washington area of the northwestern United States in the early 2000’s, and gained international attention by early 2007.
Jamie Smith, 20
And how does the wage of a bare midriff compare to that of a fully clothed barista which might put the pacemakers in Mason County at such risk? Ever wondered if the motivation for wearing a bathing suit while pulling espresso shots resided in the paycheck?
A Craigs List ad for a bikini barista position in Everett offered the following tantalizing terms:
“Looking for a bikini barista in the Everett area. $9.00 per hour. Must have experience and great customer service. Needed all different days, including weekends. Please email me your resume along with pictures and phone number to get in contact with you.”
So…$9 an hour. Compare that to the average wage of a Starbucks barista: $8.64, according to Glassdoor.com. (That drops to $8.33 if you filter for less than one year of experience). For 36 cents less you get to work while clothed? Given our chilly climate that seems like something of a no-brainer.
Ah, but there is the matter of the tip jar to consider. Yes, one bikini barista wage does not add up to a representative sample. It’s still, um, revealing.
Peek-A-Brew Espresso
Can City/Mason County residents take the strain? You can weigh in on this vital moral imperative on 3-18-13 by showing up in Shelton’s City Hall at 6:00pm…bathing suits optional. Medics for the infirm will be on hand.
Lisa Caughron, 20.
Espresso drive-through stands and coffee outlets are numerous in the greater Seattle area, and the exact inventor of the “bikini barista” concept is debated. The “Natte Latte” chain’s first location was opened in November 1999 by Mary Keller, and its employees began sporting pink leather hotpants in 2001. Next, in 2003, “Cowgirls Espresso” opened its first location in Tukwila, Washington. A few months after opening, as summer heat invaded the small 70-square-foot (6.5 m2) shop, owner Lori Bowden adopted employee suggestions that they start a “Bikini Wednesday” promotion. Sales took off, and other scantily-clad theme days soon followed. The concept of “bikini baristas” spread quickly, featuring attractive young women dressed in attire such as bikinis, lingerie, stockings, and heels.
The first round of international press attention to the trend occurred in early 2007. The international trend continued with the release of wildly popular song “Bikini Barista” from the Seattle pop-punk band Quickie. Competitors that have not followed suit have complained about the trend, and have also seen a drop in business.
Lisa Caughron, 20
The retail establishments which employ bikini baristas often adopt titillating names, including “Peek A-Brew”, “Grab n’ Go”, “Cowgirls Espresso”, “Smokin’ Hot Espresso”, “Knotty Bodies Espresso”, “Java Jigglers”, “Espresso Gone Wild”, “Java Girls”, “Sweet Spot”, and “Natte Latte”.
Lenea Campion, 20
The phenomenon of bikini baristas has caused controversy and complaints from local residents. Undercover police officers in Snohomish County, Washington witnessed some baristas performing additional services for extra money, including letting customers touch them, photograph them or watch them lick whipped cream off each other. These statements have been retracted by the Everett, WA police department, as the police officer ‘undercover’ was a known customer and offered the said barista money.The Everett, WA police department was accused of purposeful entrapment.
In September 2009, five baristas at a Grab ‘n Go in Everett, Washington were charged with prostitution after police surveillance caught them stripping and performing sexual acts for cash. Other complaints included the stand’s very close proximity to preschools and daycare centers. In another incident, “Espresso Gone Wild” in Belfair, Washington was temporarily shut down by Mason County in August 2008. It drew the ire of some Belfair residents. Mason County officials [Tim Sheldon] responded to complaints on the July 30, 2008 meeting, by ruling the espresso stand is “erotic entertainment” and off limits in the Belfair area. The owners of “Espresso Gone Wild” in Belfair were being told that their baristas are violating an erotic entertainment ordinance. They were also told that their baristas need to cover up and clean up their act or the stand will be shut down permanently.
Kathryn Porter, 25
Mason County Commissioner Tim Sheldon says the owners of “Espresso Gone Wild” are welcome to open a coffee shop and compete with all the other coffee shops in town. Sheldon also says the owners won’t be able to “sell sex and coffee on the side.”
Randi Damery, 29, left, and Kaylee McKinlay, 18
“Espresso Gone Wild” in Belfair, Washington was prohibited from allowing employees to wear pasties and their baristas now wear bikinis. Residents in another community have scrutinized a local stand and called for boycotts of companies whose employees patronize the establishments. In July 2011, the owner and three employees of Java Juggs in Snohomish County, Washington were charged with prostitution, with the police later releasing some footage obtained.
As a result of these complaints and incidents, some local jurisdictions have been considering and adopting local ordinances to regulate and control the activities of the stores.
When contacted Thursday afternoon on 2-21-13, Mayor Gary Cronce and City Councilwoman Dawn Pannel would not comment on what business had expressed interest in setting up an espresso stand at 5th St. & Railroad Ave. according to City Administrator Dave O’Leary. Other City staff would/could not comment or were unavailable, as so often is the case in the public sector. Mayor Cronce successfully ran on a platform of relaxing regulations to get City government off the backs of local businesses. His tenure, to date, has not born out this promise. A casual look in the downtown Shelton business district indicates, at the present rate, the Mayor’s promise will be irrelevant as there won’t be any backs for the City to ride.
Bikini Bar
UPDATE:
The 1st 5 to 28 minute segment of the following video clip of the Shelton City Council public hearing regarding the no bikinia baristas moratorium might have been taken straight from THE MUSIC MAN scene where the scheming salesman warns the good River City folks of Pool Halls opening in their small town. Predictably (as here) the citizenry becomes hysterical as they begin to hyperventilate, “Trouble, Trouble, Trouble…!” The creeping paternalism in City government and patriarchal oversight is stifling. Unfortunately, no bikini clad baristas were on hand to rebut the straight laced pillars of Geezerville.
After citizens weighed in with their chaste hyper-morality, substituting it for even the most basic principles of individual liberty or Constitutional guarantees, Mayor Cronce (who successfully ran on a platform of removing municipal government excess from the backsides of business owners) can be heard boasting about his moral rectitude in promoting the “legal maneuver” when responding to the 2 City Council members expressing reluctance to adopt the role of a morality cop.
Council woman Dawn Panell hazards the opinion they may have acted too hastily when adopting the anti-bikini moratorium weeks earlier, suggesting a more considered or deliberate approach of adjusting the City’s ordinance would yield better results. Councilman Olsen seconds this view to no avail in the face of the Mayor’s obvious determination the anti-bikini moratorium remain undisturbed, practically gloating over its currency.
During the earlier public comment period (which Mayor Cronce closely limits to 3-minutes/person while urging citizens to voluntarily avoid even that level of ‘verbosity’), Tom Davis, a local dedicated political observer, emphasizes ‘values’ over the moral implications as he labels bikini barista espresso stands as “despicable” from the podium. Legislating ‘taste’ and moral dress codes had become the order of the day as residents who spoke unanimously condemned the practice of donning bikinis as work attire.
Nobody spoke out in favor of civil rights, individual liberty, 1st Amendment rights to expression (including dress standards), the right of adult women to be left alone by big brother/nanny, or in opposition to a tyranny of the majority in such matters as a City notorious for its interference with local business over the slightest of pretexts continued the pattern with apparent indifference to such legal proscriptions and trashing of 1st Amendment principles. The City of Shelton may be unconcerned about the air pollution its residents endure or the urban decay and abandoned buildings, the rickety infrastructure and broken streets…but it is more than willing to protect citizens against an army of bikini-clad baristas waiting to take over the town and corrupt our youth. The town that won’t provide public restrooms 24/7 because the homeless might use them, the Gateway to Industrial Blight, the downtown that looks like it never had a bath and can’t afford its own police force in a sea of vacant store fronts, stands ready to protect us from ourselves because that’s the limit to which its incompetence can aspire. It wants you to breathe sh*t, live in squalor, but not get too frisky in the bargain. Welcome to the underbelly of small town, America–at least in Mason County.
There are plenty of (A)narchists in the world. Many have committed robbery or smuggling for their cause. Fewer have discussed strategies with Che Guevara. There is only one who has done all that, and also brought to its knees the most powerful bank on the planet by forging travelers checks, without missing a single day of work in his construction job. He is Lucio Urtubia, from a tiny village, Navarra, in the North of Spain.
CitiBank Meets Its Match, Concedes
Lucio Urtubia’s Life: Bricklayer, Forger, Revolutionary
The astute reader capable of critical reasoning and an attention span long enough to finish the longer video production may recognize the apparent contradictions in Lucio’s life–especially in his later years. A man who eschews capitalism, money, materialism, and greed spends much of his life pursuing it–both illegally (smuggling, robberies, thefts, burglaries, fencing, kidnapping, forgeries) and lawfully (army enlistment, bricklayer employee, entrepreneur) as well as negotiating with the Devil himself (Citibank), contracting with him, even keeping the terms while using the proceeds to set up a successful proprietary business for himself. Simply put, Lucio is a man driven by ambition and success, no matter how it’s measured, no less than any powerful politician or tycoon.
Lucio Urtubia
Lucio can be seen in a certain light as protesting exclusion from capitalism as much as its existence. While his use of money he acquires through his schemes is infinitely more ethical than the banks’, his personal affairs (marriage) more conservative than his radical peers, he does not shun life by rejecting money when it’s offered/available…far from it. Yet he is not greedy. He serves as a useful mentor when he counsels his distrust of everyone, including his politically radical comrades–perhaps especially them. After all, it is they who argue politics/revolution is the basis and justification of the most deplorable acts. i.e. The ends justify the means. If you’re standing on the tracks when their train happens by?–Se la vie! It’s collateral damage rivaled only in scale by the U.S. war on ‘terror’ domestically and abroad.
“Everybody cheats to the best of their ability.” -Gramma-
“Anything worth having is worth cheating for.” -W. C. Fields-
Like the Seattle Police Dept.’s planned acquisition of drones, West Seattle residents and the ACLU are upset about the installation of dozens of surveillance cameras along their beaches and waterfront. This has prompted local resistance in the form of disabling or confiscating these devices reminiscent of a scene from Orwell’s 1984. In fact, the movement against state surveillance has begun to take on global proportions.
The following images were released by the Barefoot Bandit Brigade, Puget Sound, USA
Hunters Now Hunted
Surveillance Prompts Resistance
Guerrilla surveillance camera destruction hits the U.S. by Salon
It started in Berlin: (A)narchists, donning black bloc attire, hitting the streets at night in pairs, small groups or alone, to smash and dismantle the CCTV surveillance cameras adorning city streets.
The v(a)ndals posted videos and photos of their exploits online and called the guerrilla project Camover. The German collective gave a playful interview to Vice U.K. in which they explained that they are “a diverse group of people: Shoplifters eluding capitalism who don’t want to be monitored, passengers who don’t want to followed step by step, and (A)narchists fighting everything that wants to control us.” Vice noted that the Berlin-based (A)narchists then laid down the gauntlet:
Camover has also recently announced a competition encouraging others to get involved. All you have to do to enter is think of a name that begins with the words “Brigade…” or “Command…” and that ends with the name of a historical personality, recruit a mob and smash up cameras. Then you send pictures and video evidence to their website, and they declare the winning footage.
The (a)nti-surveillance project quickly spread throughout Germany, to Finland, Greece and hit the U.S. West Coast this month. A group identifying itself as “the Barefoot Bandit Brigade” released a statement claiming to have “removed and destroyed 17 security cameras throughout the Puget Sound region,” with ostensible photo evidence published alongside. “This act is concrete sabotage against the system of surveillance and control,” wrote the group’s statement, adding that the Camover contribution was also intended in solidarity with (A)narchists in the Pacific Northwest currently in federal custody without charges for refusing to cooperate with a federal grand jury.
When asked by Vice “aren’t you just wasting taxpayers’ money, since the government will inevitably re-install any CCTV you take out?” Camover’s originators responded, “Isn’t the government just going to waste taxpayers’ money when they replace the cameras that we are inevitably going to take down again?” It’s a direct approach to fight the creepy surveillance state, to say the least.
“While very few can fight the Prince, all can conspire against him.” -Machiavelli-
Last week, The New York Times published a chilling account of how indiscriminate killing in war remains bad policy even today. This time, it’s done not by young GIs in the field but by anonymous puppeteers guiding drones that hover and attack by remote control against targets thousands of miles away, often killing the innocent and driving their enraged and grieving families and friends straight into the arms of the very terrorists we’re trying to eradicate.
Supporters of Pakistani religious party Jamat-i-Islami listen to their leaders during a rally to condemn U.S. drone attacks, April 24, 2009. (AP Photo/Mohammad Sajjad)
The Times told of a Muslim cleric in Yemen named Salem Ahmed bin Ali Jaber, standing in a village mosque denouncing al Qaeda. It was a brave thing to do — a respected tribal figure, arguing against terrorism. But two days later, when he and a police officer cousin agreed to meet with three al Qaeda members to continue the argument, all five men — friend and foe — were incinerated by an American drone attack. The killings infuriated the village and prompted rumors of an upwelling of support in the town for al Qaeda, because, the Times reported, “such a move is seen as the only way to retaliate against the United States.”
Our blind faith in technology combined with a false sense of infallible righteousness continues unabated. Reuters correspondent David Rohde recently wrote:
“The Obama administration’s covert drone program is on the wrong side of history. With each strike, Washington presents itself as an opponent of the rule of law, not a supporter. Not surprisingly, a foreign power killing people with no public discussion, or review of who died and why, promotes anger among Pakistanis, Yemenis and many others.”
Rohde has firsthand knowledge of what a drone strike can do. He was kidnapped by the Taliban in 2008 and held for seven months. During his captivity, a drone struck nearby. “It was so close that shrapnel and mud showered down into the courtyard,” he told the BBC last year. “Just the force and size of the explosion amazed me. It comes with no warning and tremendous force… There’s sense that your sovereignty is being violated… It’s a serious military action. It is not this light precise pinprick that many Americans believe.”
“It’s a serious military action… not this light precise pinprick that many Americans believe.”
A special report from the Council on Foreign Relations last month, “Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies,” quotes “a former senior military official” saying, “Drone strikes are just a signal of arrogance that will boomerang against America.” The report notes that, “The current trajectory of U.S. drone strike policies is unsustainable… without any meaningful checks — imposed by domestic or international political pressure — or sustained oversight from other branches of government, U.S. drone strikes create a moral hazard because of the negligible risks from such strikes and the unprecedented disconnect between American officials and personnel and the actual effects on the ground.”
Negligible? Such hubris brought us to grief in Vietnam and Iraq and may do so again with President Obama’s cold-blooded use of drones and his indifference to so-called “collateral damage,” grossly referred to by some in the military as “bug splat,” and otherwise known as innocent bystanders.
Yet the ease with which drones are employed and the lower risk to our own forces makes the unmanned aircraft increasingly appealing to the military and the CIA. We’re using drones more and more; some 350 strikes since President Obama took office, seven times the number that were authorized by George W. Bush. And there’s a whole new generation of the weapons on the way — deadlier and with greater endurance.
According to the CFR report, “Of the estimated three thousand people killed by drones… the vast majority were neither al-Qaeda nor Taliban leaders. Instead, most were low-level, anonymous suspected militants who were predominantly engaged in insurgent or terrorist operations against their governments, rather than in active international terrorist plots.”
By the standards of slaughter in Vietnam, the deaths caused by drones are hardly a bleep on the consciousness of official Washington. But we have to wonder if each innocent killed — a young boy gathering wood at dawn, unsuspecting of his imminent annihilation; a student who picked up the wrong hitchhikers; that tribal elder arguing against fanatics — doesn’t give rise to second thoughts by those judges who prematurely handed our president the Nobel Prize for Peace. Better they had kept it on the shelf in hopeful waiting, untarnished and unalloyed with the base metal of hypocrisy.
On Wednesday, a photo and short announcement was posted on the website Puget Sound Anarchists declaring that anarchists had “removed and destroyed” 17 security cameras in the Puget Sound region of Washington state.
The group responsible was described as the “Barefoot Bandit Brigade,” apparently named after the Northwest native Barefoot Bandit, an elusive burglar who remained uncaught until 2010 after a series of robberies that included airplanes, vehicles and bank heists.
He developed a cult following and was seen as a Robin Hood-type character to some. After one of his escapades, he left $100 and a note at a veterinary clinic in Raymond, Wash. that read: “Drove by, had some extra cash. Please use this money for the care of animals.”
The Barefoot Bandit Brigade’s destruction of surveillance cameras comes on the heels of Seattle’s recently-expanded waterfront camera network that is being funded by the Department of Homeland Security and jointly controlled by Seattle police officers to combat terrorism.
In their published statement, the (A)narchists say the following:
This act is concrete sabotage against the system of surveillance and control. It is also a message of solidarity and a wish of strength to the Seattle Grand Jury Resisters, those currently incarcerated and those not.
The Grand Jury Resisters are a group of three (A)narchists currently incarcerated for their refusal to testify to a grand jury concerning events related to last year’s May Day riots. It should be noted they have been detained for five months now without being charged with a crime.
In a recently unsealed search warrant, it was revealed that Pacific Northwest (A)narchists were being monitored before May Day as part of a counter-terrorism strategy.
The search warrant was written by FBI Special Agent Geoffry Maron, also assigned to Seattle’s Joint Terrorism Task Force. A JTTF is a federal cell that works with fusion centers like the DHS and local police departments to not only respond to but prevent terrorism.
According to the FBI website, JTTFs are the “nation’s front line on terrorism.”
In the search warrant, Agent Maron states:
Because suspected anarchists have rioted and destroyed property at other recent demonstrations, and based on the call for “direct actions,” I and other officers were responsible for preventing and responding to criminal activity on May 1, 2012.
However, the Slog reports that the majority of questions the Grand Jury Resisters are refusing to answer pertain to political activity and social networks, not the actual crimes that took place on May Day.
The justifications outlined in the search warrant include the suspects being “known anarchists” by law enforcement, warrant-less surveillance and intercepted text messages that included the words “everyone,” “safe” and “awesome.”
If Puget Sound’s surveillance cameras are intended to be used to monitor suspected terrorists and (A)narchists are considered suspected terrorists by area law enforcement, it is reasonable to assume they would be used along with current counter-terrorism surveillance.
The Barefoot Bandit Brigade’s actions are part of the “CAMOVER” movement started in Germany.
“Wait a minute baby, stay with me a while Said you’d give me light but you never told me about the fire
Droning in the sea of love…where everyone would love to drone But now it’s gone, it doesn’t matter what for When you build your house then call me, ‘Home’
And it was just like a great dark wing, within the wings of a storm
I think I had met my match, it was singing and undoing and undoing the tracers, undoing the tracers…”
“Isn’t it rich? Are we a pair? Me here at last on the ground, You in mid-air. Send in the drones.
Isn’t it bliss? Don’t you approve? One who keeps tearing around, One who can’t move. Where are the drones? Send in the drones.
Just when I’d stopped opening doors, Finally knowing the one that I wanted was yours, Making my entrance again with my usual flair, Sure of my lines, No one is there.
Don’t you love farce? My fault I fear. I thought that you’d want what I want. Sorry, my dear. But where are the drones? Quick, send in the drones. Don’t bother, they’re here.
Isn’t it rich? Isn’t it queer, Losing my timing this late In my career? And where are the drones? There ought to be drones. Well, maybe next year.”
(by Amicus Curia w/apologies to Stevie Nicks, Judy Collins, et ux)
US a step closer: Wide domestic drones use
September 2011 photo provided by Vanguard Defense Industries shows ShadowHawk drone with Montgomery County, Texas, SWAT team members.
WASHINGTON–A future in which unmanned drones are as common in U.S. skies as helicopters and airliners has moved a step closer to reality with a government request for proposals to create six drone test sites around the country.
The Federal Aviation Administration made the request Thursday, kicking off what is anticipated to be an intense competition among states hoping to win one of the sites.
The FAA also posted online a draft plan for protecting people’s privacy from the eyes in the sky. The plan would require each test site to follow federal and state laws and make a privacy policy publicly available.
Privacy advocates worry that a proliferation of drones will lead to a “surveillance society” in which the movements of Americans are routinely monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by authorities.
The military has come to rely heavily on drones overseas. Now there is tremendous demand to use drones in the U.S. for all kinds of tasks that are too dirty, dull or dangerous for manned aircraft.
Drones, which range from the size of a hummingbird to the high-flying Global Hawks that weigh about 15,000 pounds without fuel, also are often cheaper than manned aircraft. The biggest market is expected to be state and local police departments.
Industry experts predict the takeoff of a multibillion-dollar market for civilian drones as soon as the FAA completes regulations to make sure they don’t pose a safety hazard to other aircraft.
Surveillance drones
Potential civilian users are as varied as the drones themselves. Power companies want them to monitor transmission lines. Farmers want to fly them over fields to detect which crops need water. Ranchers want them to count cows. Film companies want to use drones to help make movies. Journalists are exploring drones’ newsgathering potential.
The FAA plans to begin integrating drones starting with small aircraft weighing less than about 55 pounds. The agency forecasts an estimated 10,000 civilian drones will be in use in the U.S. within five years.
The FAA is required by a law enacted a year ago to develop sites where civilian and military drones can be tested in preparation for integration into U.S. airspace that’s currently limited to manned aircraft.
The law also requires that the FAA allow drones wide access to U.S. airspace by 2015, but the agency is behind schedule on that.
The test sites are planned to evaluate what requirements are needed to ensure the drones don’t collide with planes or endanger people or property on the ground. Remotely controlled drones don’t have a pilot who can see other aircraft the way an onboard plane or helicopter pilot can.
There’s also concern that links between drones and their on-the-ground operators can be broken or hacked, causing the operator to lose control of the aircraft.
“This research will give us valuable information about how best to ensure the safe introduction of this advanced technology into our nation’s skies,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.
The test sites are also expected to boost the local economy of the communities where they are located.
Customs and Border Patrol uses drones along the U.S.-Mexico border. And the FAA has granted several hundred permits to universities, police departments and other government agencies to use small, low-flying drones. For example, the sheriff’s department in Montgomery County, Texas, has a 50-pound ShadowHawk helicopter drone intended to supplement its SWAT team.
The sheriff’s department hasn’t armed its drone, although the ShadowHawk can be equipped with a 40 mm grenade launcher and a 12-guage shotgun. The prospect of armed drones patrolling U.S. skies has alarmed some lawmakers and their constituents. More than a dozen bills have been introduced in Congress and state legislatures to curb drone use and protect privacy.
President Obama was asked Thursday about concerns that the administration believes it’s legal to strike American citizens abroad with drones and whether that’s allowed against citizens in the U.S.
“There’s never been a drone used on an American citizen on American soil,” the president said, speaking during an online chat sponsored by Google in which he was promoting his policy initiatives.
“We respect and have a whole bunch of safeguards in terms of how we conduct counterterrorism operations outside of the United States. The rules outside of the United States are going to be different than the rules inside the United States, in part because our capacity, for example, to capture terrorists in the United States are very different than in the foothills or mountains of Afghanistan or Pakistan.”
He said he would work with Congress to make sure the American public understands “what the constraints are, what the legal parameters are, and that’s something that I take very seriously.”
Earlier this week, an FAA official told a meeting of potential test site bidders that aviation regulations prohibit dropping anything from an aircraft, which could be interpreted to bar arming civilian drones, according to an industry official present at the meeting who requested anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly.
Since the manhunt for former police officer turned cop-killer Chris Dorner started, the establishment media has expressed shock and confusion at the level of animosity directed at the Los Angeles Police Department. Some have even equated this animosity with support for Dorner’s killing spree.
In a piece titled “Fugitive’s Rant Puts Focus on Evolving LAPD Legacy”, the Associated Press reports, that Dorner’s vendetta “comes at a time when it’s widely held that the police department has evolved well beyond the troubled racial legacy of Rodney King and the O.J. Simpson trial.” And what is the evidence for this apparent evolution? It’s that “Whites now make up roughly a third of the department and, while under federal authority, LAPD moved to require anti-gang and narcotics officers to disclose their finances and worked on new tools to track officer conduct.”
The AP should tell this to the family of 36-year-old Jose de la Trinidad, an unarmed Latino father of two who was shot dead in November by two Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputies.
The Sheriff’s department tried to cover it up, claiming that the officers opened fire because de la Trinidad reached for his waist to obtain what they believed was a gun, [Furtive movement!] unaware a nearby resident saw the entire thing from her bedroom window. She told investigators de la Trinidad was complying with police orders, his hands over his head and his back turned, when he was shot several times in the back, execution style. Police initially denied they ever interviewed the witness until they were grilled by the media and forced to admit they did. [The interview consisted largely of efforts to get the witness to change her account of the incident.]
Additionally, de la Trinidad’s autopsy report was released last week showing he was, indeed, shot in the back. His death leaves behind a wife, Rosanna, and two daughters ages 3 and 6. Three days after her husband was killed, Rosanna asked, “How am I supposed to explain to my daughters that their father was murdered by the police, the people who they are supposed to go to for protection.”
Perhaps Rosanna’s daughter’s will feel better knowing, as the AP so kindly reminds us, “Whites now make up roughly a third of the department” or, while under federal authority, LAPD moved to require anti-gang and narcotics officers to disclose their finances and worked on new tools to track officer conduct.”
Perhaps southern California law enforcement may be more racially diverse, but their culture of violence towards poor black and brown communities hasn’t changed, nor has the “code of silence” protecting trigger-happy officers who are rarely disciplined for their actions.
For example, nothing has happened to the eight LAPD officers who fired more than 90 rounds at unarmed 19-year-old Abdul Arian as he ran away following a car chase last year. 90 rounds! An LAPD internal probe deemed the 2010 police killing of Steven Eugene Washington, a 27-year-old unarmed autistic black man, justified as well. The LAPD officers who in 2011 shot and killed 25-year-old Reggie Doucet, naked and unarmed, were also cleared of any wrongdoing. The LAPD has yet to release the name of a man who officers shot and killed in October as he was handcuffed and lying on the ground face down.
In each of these cases, police claimed the suspect was reaching for his waistband (except in the case of naked Reggie Doucet who they say reached for the officer’s gun) and, like magic, their actions were justified.
Then there’s the LAPD’s recent scandal involving an elite gang unit promoting brutality and celebrating shootings. Last year, the Los Angles Times outed the existence of the “Jump Out Boys“, a secret group formed by seven LA Sheriff’s Department deputies and, according to Voxxi, “prides itself on aggressive policing, much of it in Latino communities, branding its members with matching tattoos of a red-eyed over-sized skull bearing the clique’s acronym and a bony hand holding a revolver.
Though the seven officers are being fired, Voxxi notes that it’s not “for any known criminal behavior but, apparently for tarnishing the department’s reputation and unethical conduct at a time when LAPD is struggling through a federal investigation.”
It’s no wonder poor communities and communities of color see the LAPD as a threat to be feared rather than the angelic department of do-gooders portrayed in the corporate media. Meanwhile, despite all the brutality, killing and cover-ups, the mainstream media can’t seem to understand why a so many people dislike the LAPD even as they’re being hunted by one of their own.
This confusion is illustrated best by the AP [Associated Press], which portrays a Facebook page as supportive of Dorner despite an explicit statement to the contrary:
On Friday, a community of online sympathizers formed, echoing complaints against police that linger in some communities. One Facebook page supporting Dorner, which had over 2,300 fans by Friday evening, said “this is not a page about supporting the killing of innocent people. It’s supporting fighting back against corrupt cops and bringing to light what they do.”
It is possible to both denounce Chris Dorner’s actions while also acknowledging the many truths in his critique of the LAPD. The establishment media doesn’t seem to get this. Instead, they see any agreement with Dorner’s assessment as tantamount to backing the murder of police officers. This reporting bias is not only foolish, but also indifferent to the people who have suffered at the hands of police violence.
It’s easy to attribute a shooting rampage to the lunacy of a deranged individual, which is largely correct. But, dismissing his motives ensures the systemic cultural factors that induced his cold violent desperate rampage will continue.