The Mahatma’s 7 Social Sins

Seven Social Sins is a list by Frederic Donaldson that Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi published in his weekly newspaper Young India on 22 October 1925.[1] Later he gave this same list written on a piece of paper to his grandson, Arun Gandhi, on their final day together shortly before his assassination.[2]

Mohandas Gandhi published the list of “Seven Social Sins” in 1925. 

Gandhi listed the sins as:

  1. Wealth without work.
  2. Pleasure without conscience.
  3. Knowledge without character.
  4. Commerce without morality.
  5. Science without humanity.
  6. Religion without sacrifice.
  7. Politics without principle.

History

The list was published by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi in his weekly newspaper Young India on 22 October 1925.[1] An almost identical list had been published six months earlier in England in a sermon at Westminster Abbey by Fredrick Lewis Donaldson.[3] Gandhi wrote that a correspondent whom he called a “fair friend” had sent the list: “The… fair friend wants readers of Young India to know, if they do not already, the following seven social sins,”[1] (the list was then provided). After the list, Gandhi wrote that “Naturally, the friend does not want the readers to know these things merely through the intellect but to know them through the heart so as to avoid them.”[1] This was the entirety of Gandhi’s commentary on the list when he first published it.

Influence

In the decades since its first publication, the list has been widely cited and discussed. Some books have also focused on the seven sins or been structured around them:

  • Eknath Easwaran (1989). The Compassionate Universe: The Power of the Individual to Heal the Environment (listed, discussed, and served as chapter structure for book)[4]
  • Stephen Covey (1989). Principle-Centered Leadership ( Chapter 7: Seven Deadly Sins (p. 87 to 93).[5][6]
  • Frank Woolever (2011) Gandhi List of Social Sins: Lessons in Truth[7]

Many books have discussed the sins more briefly:

  • Peter J. Gomes (2007). The scandalous gospel of Jesus: What’s so good about the good news?[8] Page 122 states “Years ago, I was much encouraged when I discovered that Gandhi had a list of seven social sins that, if not resisted, could destroy both persons and countries. …. We live in a world in which these social sins flourish as much today as they did in Gandhi’s time; surely the battle against them is still worth waging.”
  • Adam Taylor (2010). Mobilizing hope: Faith-inspired activism for a post-civil rights generation[9] Page  155 mentions two of the social sins, stating “The recent economic collapse (now referred to as the Great Recession) reminds me of two social sins from Gandhi’s famous list of seven deadly social sins. Gandhi warned about the dangers of wealth without work and commerce without morality….”
  • Thomas Weber (2011). “Gandhi’s Moral Economics: the Sins of Wealth Without Work and Commerce Without Morality.”[10] Page 141 lists the sins and their date of publication, stating that “These and many of Gandhi’s own writings make it quite clear that the Mahatma did not compartmentalize his life. For him, economics together with politics, morality and religion formed an indivisible whole.”
  • Rana P. B. Singh (2006). “Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi.”[11] Page  107 lists the sins and gives a 2 or 3 sentence explanation of each, stating “these are ideals, but they are more relevant in the present era of desperation and could easily be accepted.”

They have also been anthologized:

  • Anil Dutt Misra (2008). Inspiring Thoughts Of Mahatma Gandhi [12]

In 2025, Ahir Shah made a BBC Radio 4 series, 7 Blunders of the World, based on the list.[13]

Politics without principle

Regarding “politics without principle”, Gandhi said[citation needed] having politics without truth(s) to justly dictate the action creates chaos, which ultimately leads to violence. Gandhi called these missteps “passive violence”, ‘which fuels the active violence of crime, rebellion, and war.’ He said, “We could work ’til doomsday to achieve peace and would get nowhere as long as we ignore passive violence in our world.”[14]

Politics is literally defined as, “The struggle in any group for power that will give one or more persons the ability to make decisions for the larger group.”[15]

Mohandas Gandhi defined principle as, “the expression of perfection, and as imperfect beings like us cannot practice perfection, we devise every moment limits of its compromise in practice.”[16]

There are many different types of regimes in the world whose politics differ. Based on Gandhi’s Blunder Politics without Principle, a regime type might be more of a root of violence than another because one regime has more principle than the other. Regimes have different types of fighting and aggression tactics, each desiring different outcomes.

This difference affects the actions taken by political heads in countries across the globe. Gandhi wrote, “An unjust law is itself a species of violence.”[17] The aggression of one country on another may be rooted in the government’s creation of an unjust law. For example, a war of irredentism fought for one state to reclaim territory that was lost due to a law promoting ethnic cleansing.[citation needed]

Principle in one country could easily be a crime in another. This difference leads one to believe that the root of violence is inevitably present somewhere in the world. “Politics without Principle” will inevitably take place throughout time.[citation needed]“I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.”[18]

This list grew from Gandhi’s search for the roots of violence. He called these “acts of passive violence”. Preventing these is the best way to prevent oneself or one’s society from reaching a point of violence, according to Gandhi.[citation needed]

To this list, Arun Gandhi added an eighth blunder, “rights without responsibilities”.[19] According to Arun Gandhi, the idea behind the first blunder originates from the feudal practice of Zamindari. He also suggests that the first and the second blunders are interrelated.[citation needed]

Arun Gandhi description as “Seven Blunders”

Arun Gandhi, who was personally given the list by his grandfather, Mohandas Gandhi, has described it as a list of “Seven Blunders of the World” that lead to violence.

More recently Mohandas Gandhi’s list of negative qualities has also been described by his grandson as “Seven Blunders of the World”. Examples of description under this heading include:

  • Knickerbocker, Brad (1 February 1995). “Gandhi grandson pursues peace”Christian Science Monitor. p. 14. ISSN 0882-7729(sidebar) (profile of Arun Gandhi that gives a list entitled “Mohandas Gandhi’s ‘Seven Blunders of the World,'” and states that “The last time Arun saw his grandfather, the old man slipped the boy a piece of paper with a list of what have come to be known as Gandhi’s ‘Seven Blunders of the World’ that lead to violence.” It also states that Arun Gandhi “would make ‘Rights without responsibilities’ No. 8 on his grandfather’s list of ‘blunders.'”)

See also

References

  1. Jump up to:a b c d The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi (electronic edition), Vol. 33, pp. 133-134. ISBN 8123007353ISBN 9788123007359 OCLC 655798065
  2. ^ Gandhi’s “Seven Blunders of the World” That Lead to Violence . . . Plus 5 Archived 15 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ “Evils of World are Outlined”. Archived from the original on 2 April 2017.
  4. ^ Easwaran, Eknath (1989). The Compassionate Universe: The Power of the Individual to Heal the Environment. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press. 
    ISBN 9780915132591OCLC 20393226ISBN 0915132591ISBN 9780915132584,
     ISBN 0915132583
  5. ^ “Seven Deadly Sins as per Mahatma Gandhi”. mkgandhi.org. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
  6. ^ Covey, Stephen R. (2009). Principle-Centered Leadership. RosettaBooks. pp. 87–93. ISBN 978-0-7953-0959-5.
  7. ^ Woolever, Frank (2011). Gandhi’s List of Social Sins: Lessons in Truth. Pittsburgh, PA: Dorrance Publishing. ISBN 9781434907943OCLC 801817588ISBN 1434907945 (focuses on the list)
  8. ^ Gomes, Peter J. (2007). The scandalous gospel of Jesus: What’s so good about the good news?. New York: HarperOne. ISBN 9780060000738OCLC 125402376.
  9. ^ Taylor, Adam (2010). Mobilizing hope: Faith-inspired activism for a post-civil rights generation. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books. ISBN 9780830838370.
  10. ^ In: Brown, Judith M.Anthony Parel (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Gandhi. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 135–153. ISBN 9780521116701OCLC 646309046.
  11. ^ In: Simon, David (Ed.) (2006). Fifty key thinkers on development. London: Routledge. pp. 106–110. ISBN 9780203098820OCLC 68710779.
  12. ^ Inspiring Thoughts Of Mahatma Gandhi Concept Publishing Co. ISBN 9788180694417 (listed, p. 239)
  13. ^ Shah, Ahir (7 January 2025). “Ahir Shah’s Seven Blunders of the World”BBC. Retrieved 21 April 2025.
  14. ^ Meadows, Donella. “Gandhi’s Seven Blunders — and then Some”The Donella Meadows Archive. Archived from the original on 4 July 2011. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
  15. ^ O’Neil, Patrick H. (2009). Essentials of Comparative Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 323ISBN 9780393933772.
  16. ^ Gandhi, Mohandas (14 September 2018). “Inspired Words by Mohandas Gandhi”Wisdom Quotes.
  17. ^ Gandhi, Mohandas. “Quote – An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so…” Wisdom Quotes. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
  18. ^ Gandhi, Mohandas. “Mahatma Gandhi quotes”. Retrieved 30 June 2011.
  19. ^ Arun Gandhi’s article
hidevteMahatma Gandhi
Life events
and movements
Indian Ambulance CorpsTolstoy FarmBardoli SatyagrahaChamparan SatyagrahaKheda SatyagrahaIndian independence movementNon-cooperation movementChauri Chaura incidentPurna Swaraj flagSalt MarchDharasana SatyagrahaVaikom SatyagrahaAundh ExperimentGandhi–Irwin Pact Second Round Table ConferencePadayatraPoona PactNatal Indian CongressQuit India speechGujarat Vidyapith UniversityHarijan Sevak SanghIndia ashrams (KochrabSabarmatiSodepur KhadiSevagram)List of fastsAssassination
PhilosophyPractices and beliefsComposite nationalismGandhismEconomics trusteeshipEducationSarvodayaSatyagrahaSwadeshiSwarajEleven vowsGandhi cap
PublicationsHarijanHind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule)Indian OpinionThe Story of My Experiments with TruthMangal PrabhatYoung IndiaSeven Social SinsNavajivan TrustGandhi Heritage Portal
InfluencesA Letter to a HinduAhimsa (nonviolence)Bhagavad GitaHenry David Thoreau (Civil Disobedience (essay))Civil disobedienceFastingHinduismKhadiJohn RuskinParsee RustomjeeLeo Tolstoy (The Kingdom of God Is Within You)The Masque of AnarchyNarmadPacifismSermon on the MountShravanShrimad RajchandraHenry Stephens SaltTirukkuṛaḷUnto This Last Gandhi’s translationRaghupati Raghava Raja Ram“”Ekla Chalo Re“”Hari Tuma Haro“”Vaishnava Jana ToVegetarianism
AssociatesSwami AnandC. F. AndrewsJamnalal BajajShankarlal BankerSarla BehnVinoba BhaveBrij Krishna ChandiwalaSudhakar ChaturvediJugatram DaveMahadev DesaiDada DharmadhikariKanu GandhiShiv Prasad GuptaUmar Hajee Ahmed JhaveriJ. C. KumarappaHermann KallenbachAbdul Ghaffar KhanAcharya KripalaniMirabehnMohanlal PandyaVallabhbhai PatelNarhari ParikhMithuben PetitChakravarti RajagopalachariBibi Amtus SalamSonja SchlesinAnugrah Narayan SinhaShri Krishna SinhaRettamalai SrinivasanV. A. SundaramAbbas TyabjiRavishankar VyasKishorlal Mashruwala
LegacyArtistic depictionsGandhigiriGandhi Peace AwardGandhi Peace FoundationGandhi Peace PrizeMahatma Gandhi Kashi VidyapithIndian currency (Gandhi Series, Gandhi New Series, Indian rupee)Indian 10 Rupee postage stamp
FamilyKaramchand Gandhi (father)Kasturba (wife)Harilal (son)Manilal (son)Ramdas (son)Devdas (son)Maganlal (cousin)Samaldas (nephew)Arun (grandson)Ela (granddaughter)Rajmohan (grandson)Gopalkrishna (grandson)Ramchandra (grandson)Kanu (grandson)Kanu (grandnephew)Tushar (great-grandson)Leela (great-granddaughter)
Influenced14th Dalai LamaAung San Suu KyiAbhay BangAbdul Ghaffar KhanBrajkishore PrasadC. RajagopalachariEknath EaswaranDroupadi MurmuFrançois BayrouGopaldas Ambaidas DesaiGovind Ballabh PantHo Chi MinhJames BevelJames LawsonJawaharlal NehruJoan BondurantLal Bahadur ShastriLanza del VastoMaulana AzadMartin Luther King Jr.Maria Lacerda de MouraMehdi BazarganMorarji DesaiNarendra ModiNelson MandelaRajendra PrasadRamjee SinghSteve BikoSane GurujiVinoba BhaveVallabhbhai Patel
MemorialsStatuesGhanaIndia PatnaNational Salt Satyagraha MemorialNew DelhiSouth Africa JohannesburgPietermaritzburgUK Parliament SquareTavistock SquareU.S. DavisDenverHoustonMilwaukeeNew YorkSan FranciscoSan JoseWashington, D.C.ObservancesGandhi JayantiInternational Day of Non-ViolenceMartyrs’ DaySeason for NonviolenceOtherAga Khan PalaceGandhi BhawanGandhi MandapamGandhi MarketBookstoresGandhi PromenadeGandhi SmritiGandhi MemorialGandhi Memorial Museum, MaduraiGandhi Smarak SangrahalayaGandhi TeerthGandhi Temple, BhataraKaba Gandhi No DeloKirti MandirMahatma Gandhi CollegeMahatma Gandhi Marine National ParkMahatma Gandhi Memorial Centre, MataleMani BhavanMahatma Gandhi Museum, RajkotNational Gandhi MuseumRaj GhatRoads named after GandhiSabarmati AshramSatyagraha House
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Elixir of Life (Podcast & Transcript 6-6-25)

Elixir of Life Podcast AUDIO (Listen/Play)

The Elixir of Life transcript

(June 6, 2025 Podcast)

Doctor and special correspondent Avir Mitra takes Lulu on an epic journey live on stage at a little basement club called Caveat, here in New York. Starting with an ingredient in breastmilk that babies can’t digest, a global hunt that takes us from Bangladesh to the Mennonite communities here in the US, we discover an ancient symbiotic relationship that might be on the verge of disappearing. So sip a vicarious cocktail, settle in, and explore the surprising ways our bodies forge deep, invisible connections that shape our lives.

This live show is part of a series we are doing with Avir that we are calling “Viscera.” Each event is a conversation that takes the audience on a journey into a quirk or question or mystery inside of us, and gives them a visceral experience with the viscera of us. The previous installment of the series, was called “How to Save a Life.”

Special thanks to Tim Brown, David Mills, Carlito Lebrilla, Bethany Henrik, Danielle Lemay, Katie Hinde, Jennifer Smilowitz, Angela Zivkovic, Daniela Barile, Mark Underwood.

EPISODE CREDITS:
Reported by Avir Mitra
with help from Anisa Vietze
Original music from Dylan Keefe
Sound design contributed by Dylan Keefe, Iván Barenboim
Fact-checking by Natalie Middleton.

Sign up for our newsletter!! It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Sign up (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!

Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.

Follow our show on InstagramTwitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.
Leadership support for Radiolab’s science programming is provided by the Simons Foundation and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

[RADIOLAB INTRO]

LULU MILLER: Latif?

LATIF NASSER: Yeah? Lulu?

LULU: [laughs] So I have a special treat for you today.

LATIF: Okay.

LULU: Recently I got to do a live show. It was in a little club in New York City called Caveat.

LATIF: Oh, I’ve always wanted to go there! Yeah.

LULU: It’s really cute. It’s got, like, a cabaret underground vibe.

LATIF: Are you finally singing? I feel like you’ve been just waiting to get out there and sing.

LULU: You know, I did not sing in this show at all. But there were live musicians, including Dylan Keefe on upright bass, our director of sound design.

LULU: Okay, thank you all for coming out. Thank you kindly.

LULU: And a rock star of sorts.

LULU: Without further ado, Avir Mitra. Can we get some bring-on music?

LATIF: Ooh, Avir!

LULU: Yeah. So as you know, Avir Mitra is our ER doctor, special correspondent.

LATIF: Mm-hmm.

LULU: Who has done some of the most beloved medical mystery tales on the show.

LATIF: So many vultures, plane crashes.

LULU: Mm-hmm. Easter Island dirt.

LATIF: That’s right. Yeah.

LULU: And he had another one in store that he told on stage that night. Truly an odyssey. Takes us all over the globe. We blow by the Mennonite community, we go to Gambia, we go back into deep evolutionary time to stage a reunion, a physical reunion with what Avir calls humanity’s oldest friend.

LATIF: Hmm!

LULU: And he kicked off the whole thing with a bottle full of white liquid.

AVIR MITRA: We’re talking about the magical substance that is breast milk.

[cheers]

LULU: And because, as you know, I recently had a baby, the breast milk was provided by me.

LULU: I have an eight month old. I am breastfeeding. I also use formula. This is not—this is not—we’re not here to say one or the other is better. But instead …

LULU: And so we just kind of held it up to the spotlight, everyone was looking at it. And Avir kicked the whole thing off with just a simple question.

AVIR: Here, I guess I’m gonna throw it to the crowd. Like, if we just had to name the components of breast milk—and I’m gonna take one off the table. We know that it’s 87 percent water. Okay, fine. That’s easy. But the solid part. Like, name some things. What’s in breast milk?

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Vodka.

AVIR: Vodka?

LULU: [laughs] Depending on the mother’s night.

AVIR: Yeah. Yeah, right.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Fat.

AVIR: Fat.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Sugar.

AVIR: Sugar. Proteins, hormones. Calcium.

LULU: Calcium.

AVIR: You guys are right. I mean, everything you’re saying is right. But there is something that we’ve missed. It’s called human milk oligosaccharides. And what’s crazy is it’s actually the third-largest compound in breast milk, way above protein. So, you know, you have lactose.

LULU: Oh!

AVIR: That’s the sugar that someone mentioned. You have lipids. That’s fat. And then you have these HMOs, and they are strange.

LATIF: Wait. HMOs?

LULU: [laughs] Yeah, it’s not your healthcare—health insurance organization.

LATIF: Oh.

LULU: They are—they’re actually sugars, but as Avir told us, they are totally different than normal sugars. And they form into these kind of gorgeous but strange elaborate shapes.

AVIR: Branches and chains and ferns and weird shapes.

LULU: And they are—they are not found anywhere else in nature, just in human breast milk.

LATIF: Weird!

LULU: In fact, Avir calls them “alien sugars.”

LATIF: And that’s the number three ingredient in breast milk, alien sugar?

LULU: The third biggest, yeah.

AVIR: You can’t get them at the local grocery store. And what’s crazy about it is humans can’t digest this stuff at all. Like, literally no human being can do anything with these sugars. And no one ever really thought to ask, like, what’s going on, really, until a scientist by the name of Bruce German came along and basically just asked this simple question: Why? Why would a mother who’s got very precious, limited calories, why would that mother literally dissolve her own body, taking all these precious nutrients and calories to make milk that needs to feed this baby, why would the mom make these sugars that no baby can use? Why? So this is around 2005. Bruce is having these thoughts, and this is the era, sort of, of the microbiome, where we’re all thinking about the microbiome. And it’s this idea that, like, we’re basically human suits covered in bacteria, filled with bacteria.

LULU: [laughs]

AVIR: You know? And so he has this hunch that’s basically like, okay, well, if we can’t use it maybe there’s a bacteria that can.

LULU: In where?

AVIR: That lives inside of a baby. You know, maybe there’s a bacteria that lives in the baby.

LULU: All right. That would make sense. Like, food for our baby bacteria.

AVIR: Right.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: So they design an experiment basically taking an agar plate where bacteria like to grow.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: So they decide, “Okay, we’ll take the agar plate, sprinkle the alien sugars on a plate, and throw a bacteria in there and see if it grows.”

LULU: If you eat it, you’ll proliferate. If you don’t, you’re gonna die.

AVIR: Exactly.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: Yeah, you got it.

LULU: All right.

AVIR: So they throw some bacteria—you know, take a common bacteria that lives in the gut, throw it on there, throw some HMOs. It dies, doesn’t work, no luck.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: Try another one, no luck. Try a third one, no luck.

LULU: Okay, how long is this taking?

AVIR: Well, so a year goes by.

LULU: Yep.

AVIR: Bruce and his team are, like, begging, borrowing, stealing, to get, like, any breast milk that they can. You know, begging on the street. Like, “Can I get some?”

LULU: [laughs]

AVIR: You know, it’s not working. A year goes by. Two years go by.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And finally on the third year—boom. They find something.

[suspenseful music]

AVIR: That was perfect.

LULU: Ooh!

AVIR: Wow. Why do we prep for these podcasts? We could just do this.

LULU: I know. Let’s just always do that. Okay.

AVIR: Okay, so they find something that’s growing. You could see all this white stuff is bacteria that’s growing.

LULU: At this point Avir shows us a picture of a plate with all this bacteria growing on it.

AVIR: Because they put it under a microscope, and it looks very strange.

LULU: Ooh!

LULU: If you zoom in on this picture, this collection of squiggles …

AVIR: Zoom in a little more.

LULU: It’s beautiful!

LULU: … becomes …

AVIR: Zoom in a little more.

LULU: … these individual little …

AVIR: A little more.

LULU: … Y shapes.

LULU: And so this is the bacteria that likes to eat the weird alien sugar in the breast milk?

AVIR: Exactly. And so it turns out this bacteria is called Bifidobacterium infantis.

LATIF: Bifidobacterium infantis. Never heard of it.

LULU: Mm-hmm. Yeah, we can just call it ‘Bifid’ for short. It is shaped like a Y, and with one of the little spires kind of bent over like a little puppy dog ear. It’s kinda cute. Anyway, this was the only bacteria they could find that actually ate those alien sugars in breast milk.

LATIF: Huh!

AVIR: Yeah. So, yeah.

LULU: Okay, so does that mean this is in my baby’s belly?

AVIR: Well, that’s the next question. Exactly right. So you have found, out of the thousands of bacteria, you found one that can eat these sugars. That’s crazy enough.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: Because, like, you know, we don’t—we can’t eat them, but it has all the genes and all the enzymes to eat these sugars that we make that we can’t eat. It’s just weird, right?

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: So you would think okay, this—this should be in some babies’ guts.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: And so the way to look for that is, you know, when you have bacteria in your gut, you’re gonna poop out some of that bacteria. So you really gotta get into poop. You know, that’s where this story is going. And so basically from there, Bruce and his team need to start collecting dirty diapers, you know? Which I don’t know if that’s an upgrade from begging for milk, but that’s where they’re at.

[laughter]

AVIR: So Bruce is working at UC Davis. He’s around getting his friends and neighbors and strangers on the street to give him their dirty diapers. “Let’s culture it. Let’s see if we can find some Bifid in there.”

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: But no, he can’t find any Bifid in any—in any of these diapers.

LULU: They’re just not—so that theory’s gone?

AVIR: Well, it might just be where they’re located, you know? So they realize they need

to sort of expand the search. And that’s where this idea starts, what I call the amazing global baby diaper hunt.

LULU: [laughs] Okay.

AVIR: So it turns out that the Gates Foundation, for some reason, has collected stool samples from all over the planet. I’m not sure why, but don’t tell Elon Musk about this please.

LULU: Basic science! You never know!

AVIR: So they have just baby poop, like—like, just lining their walls, I guess. I don’t know.

LULU: Just libraries of poop.

AVIR: Just libraries of poop from all over the world.

LULU: Okay. Yeah.

AVIR: So Bruce calls them, you know, sets up a meeting and says, “Can I get some of this? Let me get some of this poop!” So yeah, they set up a deal where he’s gonna—they’re gonna send him poop from all over the world. And they’re gonna look all over the place. So they look. They start looking at poop in Denmark.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And no Bifid.

AVIR: Okay.

AVIR: Scandinavia, Switzerland. No—no Bifid.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: But then they get to Gambia.

LULU: Huh!

AVIR: Bifid. It’s there in the poop. Cambodia, it’s there. Rural China, Bangladesh. They have Bifid.

LULU: Huh!

AVIR: Weirdly, the only people in the US? Mennonites.

LULU: Mennonites have the Bifid? The babies have it?

AVIR: Very strange.

LULU: Why some places and not others?

AVIR: Well, that’s the question. At this time, they don’t really know why here, why not there?

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: It’s a mystery. I mean, it certainly could be—you know, maybe this bacteria survives in a certain climate. Maybe it’s genetic differences, maybe it’s lifestyle differences. It’s an open question.

LULU: Okay. Does he have any guesses of—like, there’s obviously some bacteria we

like that are great for gut health, some we don’t want. Is it—does he have any

sense of what it’s actually doing?

AVIR: Right. That’s the next question is Bruce and the team, guy by the name of David Mills, all these amazing scientists want to figure out, what is this bacteria doing?

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: So what they do is they do another experiment. They basically take some cells from the gut which you can take. You can culture them and you can put them on a plate. And when you put gut cells on a plate, they actually automatically form themselves into a wall. And so it’s kind of cool because, you know, gut cells, what they’re supposed to do is basically form a wall, and anything you eat or drink has to basically go through those cells to get to your body. So it wants to make sure all the food is the right food. It’s all broken down properly. All the good stuff comes in, all the bad stuff stays out. That’s what the gut cells do. So they form into this wall. A gut’s being formed in a petri dish. They throw some Bifidobacterium on the petri dish and see what happens.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: And right away they notice that the bacteria are able to sort of latch onto the walls of the gut, just, like, hang there like mountain climbers. And they start proliferating really fast and basically coating the whole wall.

LULU: Whoa! So this Y-shaped bacteria that likes alien sugars with enough time will—it’s almost like wallpaper on the inside of the baby’s gut?

AVIR: Yeah, exactly. It’s like wallpaper on the walls.

LULU: Okay. So I guess I ask again, is this a good—is this a good thing?

AVIR: Right. We don’t know, like, if it’s good or not.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: So to answer that …

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: I gotta tell you a story.

LULU: Okay. I love a story.

AVIR: All right, so Dylan—guys, I’m gonna need a little bit of, like—rogue, don’t try this at home—just don’t try this type of stuff at home.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: So our story centers around Dr. Shara Sheldon, who at the time is a PhD student, okay? Now she’s studying this stuff. She goes to a lecture where Bruce is talking about these results, and it sticks in the back of her mind. Meanwhile, her father is a professor at the vet school, and he works at a lab—like, at the—not at a lab at a barn that’s raising these thoroughbred horses.

LULU: Ooh. Okay!

AVIR: So thoroughbred horses, if you don’t know, you know, those are those really expensive horses that—you know, they eat way better food than you and I.

LULU: [laughs] Yeah.

AVIR: Their lives are definitely more valuable than ours.

LULU: For sure.

AVIR: Like, these are expensive …

LULU: Fine. Yeah. Okay.

AVIR: But there’s a problem at the barn. Every new foal that’s being born to these horses, after a few days is getting diarrhea, fevers, and then dying.

LULU: Oh!

AVIR: Yeah. And that’s sad because we like horses, but also sad because they’re losing, like, hundreds of thousands of dollars every time this happens.

LULU: On every foal. Okay. Okay.

AVIR: And the problem is next week there’s gonna be, like, 20 more foals being born.

LULU: Oh, no!

AVIR: And yeah, so basically what they do is they find out what’s going on, and it turns out these horses are infested with, like, one of the worst diarrheal bacteria that we have. And if anyone works—does anyone work in healthcare or anything like that? I mean, what’s the one bacteria—diarrheal illness that we don’t want to deal with?

AUDIENCE MEMBER: C. diff.

AVIR: C. diff, exactly.

LULU: C. diff.

AVIR: You know it. Once you’ve smelled C. diff once you’ll never forget. I mean …

LULU: Avir showed a picture of C. diff that was right behind us on stage.

LULU: Okay, it looks like a dynamite stick, like, exploding corn dog situation.

AVIR: Yes, the corn dog dynamite stick. This bacteria is terrible.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: Like, you can’t—if you spray this with antiseptic, if you spray it with Purell, like, it won’t die. Like, this thing doesn’t die.

LULU: Yikes!

AVIR: It’s really hard—needs very strong antibiotics.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: It kills people all the time.

LULU: Oh, no!

AVIR: We see this every time in the hospital. And it was killing these horses, so these foals infested with C. diff. The dad, who’s the professor who works there, is talking to his daughter about it and commiserating. And the daughter goes, “Wait, like, I just heard a lecture by this guy, Bruce German.”

LULU: Oh, no.

AVIR: “And he was talking about this bacteria that coats the walls. Like, let’s give this to the horses.”

[laughter]

AVIR: So—so the dad goes, “Yeah. I mean, let’s try it.” So they take the bacteria from Bruce, they culture it, they mix it up with some milk.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And then when the foal is just born, they squirt it into the foal’s mouth.

LULU: Like with a little baby bottle?

AVIR: Yeah, a little baby—squirt it in.

LULU: Hope for the best, it’s only $100,000 on the line.

AVIR: Right.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And lo and behold, what happens is sure enough, 20 foals are born, none of them get C. diff, all of them do fine.

LULU: Whoa!

AVIR: Incredible.

LULU: We—go—can we get a round of applause for Shara?

AVIR: Rebel science.

LULU: Again, don’t try it at home. Like, clinical trials are good, but ingenuity, okay.

AVIR: So I want to play my interview with her, because I wish I could tell you the story stopped there, but it continues on.

LULU: Oh.

AVIR: All right. Let’s see.

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: I was like, “Good job, brain, for remembering the random lecture with Bruce German.”]

LULU: So in the room we’re actually now watching a video of the interview where you can see Shara on the left—put together, short dark hair. And Avir on the right is, like, kinda sweaty and, like, was just saving lives, maybe.

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: There are so many random lectures I had in med school that I will never remember. Like, I don’t know how you did that.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: I loved it, though. I thought it was the neatest thing. I don’t know.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Okay, so that’s an amazing story, but I know that the story doesn’t end there. What happens next?]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: So time goes on. I’m still doing my PhD, and got married, got pregnant, and then I had my baby—healthy baby. Everything’s going great and then the change comes. And we started dealing with a lot of gas, a lot of crying. Just—like, he looked like he was in pain. We were trying everything for the gas—the little gas drops that are natural, the bicycle kicks, all kinds of things. So I just was getting quite desperate to find something that would work. And we kind of hit the breaking point when my husband was out of town. And so I’m alone with the baby, and it was so bad. He was up, like, all night, just in pain, gassy. And I was like, “This is not going to work.” And I said, “We need something.” And so I remembered the Bifidobacterium. And I said, “I’m going to email Bruce.” And so I sent a desperate email saying, “Please, please, I know you have some of this Bifidobacterium still. Like, I’d really like to try it.”]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Okay, and so does he email back? Like, does he take a week to email back?]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: He got back to me right away, and he said, “You can drive up and get it.” And I loaded up in the car, drove to Davis, and went in. And we got, like, a little bag, just a brown paper bag, with samples in there and this syringe.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: No way. What, they’re in, like, little vials or something, or like …?]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: No, they’re in little sachets. Like a little rectangular packet that you, like, can rip across and pour out.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Oh. Okay, yeah, I got it.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: So, I was like …]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Like a bag of drugs, basically.]

[laughter]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: Yeah. You know, you’re using stuff that’s being tested for research, so it’s not very pretty.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Right.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: I get home, I’m very excited to try this. I grab one of the little sachet packets out, and I open it and I see there’s, like, a powder in there. It had kind of an interesting odor, I noticed. And then I mix it in with the breast milk and then suck it up in the syringe. And then my mom helps me hold Connor and we hold his head and we put the syringe into his mouth, squirt it in. So we did that. And they said, “Just do one dose a day.” So, you know, I’m sitting there with baited breath, waiting to see if anything happens, watching him like a hawk. We didn’t really see any changes right away, so I was a little disappointed because you’re desperate at this point, right? I want results. I’m so tired.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Right.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: And it took two days. So—and then it worked.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Oh, wow. Okay. What do you mean it worked? Like …?]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: It—the change was just so drastic. It was like a switch had clicked. And he just was so much happier. He was sleeping. He wouldn’t have the gas constantly, and just seemed so much more relaxed. And I just—I was like, “This is working.” And this is exactly what was missing from his microbiota.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Well, you know, the scientist in me has to ask, like, you know, could this have just been a coincidence, you know, like, or placebo effect? You know, obviously you really wanted to see some results. Like, how do you know—how do you know for sure that this did that?]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: I would be doing the same thing, right? “Oh, this is just a placebo.” But the amount of dirty diapers had been very consistent. I had been keeping track because I love data and I’m a nerd, so I was keeping track of all of these things. And to go from, like, that eight to eleven down to two, I knew it was doing something.]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Avir: Wow, that’s—I gotta say—I mean like, was there ever a part of you that felt, like, afraid to essentially be, like, experimenting on your firstborn child? Or did you just feel that confident?]

[laughter]

[ARCHIVE CLIP, Shara Sheldon: I mean, I felt really confident with it. And there’s a small part of you that’s like, “Oh yeah, I’m giving this novel thing to my baby.” But when I saw all the benefit, it was like, “This is right, and it’s working and everything’s good.” But it is scary.]

LULU: Oh, wow! As a—I just have to say, is there any other, like, better image of sleep deprivation than, like, “This thing smelled a little weird, but let’s put it down.” Wow! Okay, go Shara. I mean, what—okay, but to follow up on your—your question there, like, do we know what it—like, is there still a chance that could have been placebo? Do we have any clue about what’s actually happening at the cellular level? Like, what is going on?

AVIR: Yeah, so Bruce sort of made a deal with Shara. Like, “I’ll give you the bacteria, you give me his diapers.”

LULU: [laughs] Okay.

AVIR: Common theme we’re seeing emerge here. So that’s what he does. He sort of collects Connor’s diapers—and a bunch of other kids’ too—and he’s sort of seeing what’s going on. “Let’s check the microbiome, let’s check the stool, see what’s happening.”

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: Let’s look for a subtle change, like a change of five, ten percent in your microbiome, I mean, that’s huge.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: But what he finds is actually Connor’s diapers went from having zero Bifidobacterium to being 80 percent Bifidobacterium.

LULU: Whoa!

AVIR: And this is, like, insane, because, you know, it’s not—we’re not even—this isn’t normal microbiome stuff. This isn’t, like, diverse ecosystem. This is just like domination by one bacterium.

LULU: It’s like a monoculture in there.

AVIR: Yeah, exactly.

LULU: It’s all Bifid. Wow!

AVIR: Yeah. Okay, so they notice that, and that’s interesting. Another thing they notice as well, is just like babies eat and they poop, well, these bacterias are eating these alien sugars and they have to poop, too.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: But what they’re seeing is the poop that these bacteria are creating are acid. So they’re creating acidic poop. And the thing is bacteria can’t really grow that well in acid, so acid prevents bacteria—most bacteria from growing.

LULU: Oh!

AVIR: And it turns out that Bifidobacterium is totally chilling in the acid, but the idea is it may be keeping other bacteria away.

LATIF: Okay. Can I—can I just make sure I understand what’s going on?

LULU: Absolutely.

LATIF: Okay, so Bifid is the thing that eats the weird sugar in breast milk.

LULU: Mm-hmm.

LATIF: And if you put it in a baby’s gut it’ll receive that sugar, it’ll eat the sugar, it’ll bloom and it’ll wallpaper the gut, but also it’ll, like, edge out all the other bacteria.

LULU: With its acid poop, yes.

LATIF: With its acid. Right.

LULU: Bully wallpaper, kind of. [laughs]

LATIF: Okay. And the idea is that the bully wallpaper is what helped Shara’s baby have less gas and less pooping pain or whatever?

LULU: Yeah. I mean, we don’t know what was happening inside Shara’s baby for sure, but that is exactly Bruce German’s theory. And, you know, Avir pointed out there’s a lot of situations, especially in a newly-developing baby gut, that if the wrong kinds of bacteria get in there it can release toxins and poke holes in the gut wall.

AVIR: And allow things to pass through. Instead of going through the cells, they sort of go in between the cells and around the cells. So bacteria can get in, toxins can get in, undigested food particles can get in.

LULU: Ugh!

AVIR: And that’s called “leaky gut.”

LATIF: Leaky gut.

LULU: Yeah. And according to Avir, that can cause a lot more problems than just gas pain or diarrhea.

AVIR: And for this baby that just got an immune system, like, two months ago, it’s trying to figure out what the hell is going on, and it gets very overwhelmed and confused. It gets inflamed. The immune system is hyperactivated, and it causes a lot—you know, it can cause a lot of problems.

LULU: So Bruce’s theory is that, you know, going back to Bifid coating the walls of the gut …

AVIR: When Bifidobacterium’s here, the Bifidobacterium sticks to the walls, prevents any other bacteria from coming there, so that basically nothing bad gets into the body.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And the immune system can actually, like, learn and do its thing.

LATIF: And to be clear, so this is a bacteria that most babies, especially here in the US right now do not have.

LULU: Exactly. And what’s wild is that you can actually see the disappearance over time, because if you look back over time at poop samples from across the world—which there are—one of Bruce’s grad students at the time actually did this, Bethany Henrich, she looked at the historical data and found that baby poop back in the early 1900s, it used to be way more acidic, like, everywhere.

LATIF: Whoa! It’s just been subtly changing all this time?

LULU: Yeah, over the last hundred years. In places like the US, it started trending over to neutral.

AVIR: There’s this very clear line, and it’s showing that basically our baby’s poop used to be acidic to a pH of five, which is acidic.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And it’s slowly been working its way up to neutral. And it’s like this very clear thing if you map it out.

LULU: Huh! And again, you said the Bifid makes the acidic poop, so watching it get less acidic, is that like watching a disappearance?

AVIR: Exactly.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: At this point, Bruce and the team is sort of being like, “Wait, this is a sign. This is the marker of Bifid, and it’s going away.”

LULU: Huh.

AVIR: That’s what they see.

LATIF: Wow, this feels—you’re making me, like, miss this thing. Like, I feel like we should get it back.

LULU: Yeah, well that is where we are going next in the show. First we’re gonna take a brief intermission, but when we come back we will not only address that, we’re gonna have special guests live on stage, we’re gonna hear about cease and desist orders from the FDA coming down to doctors, and we’re gonna be doing some real life I guess you could call it experimentation on the audience.

LATIF: On babies?

LULU: Not babies. On adults in the bar.

LATIF: [laughs] Okay.

LULU: Stick with us!

LULU: Okay.

LATIF: Okay. Latif.

LULU: Lulu.

LATIF: Radiolab.

LULU: We are back, playing the live show I did with Avir Mitra, telling the story of this baby gut bacterium that seems to be protecting the baby’s gut. And we didn’t delve into this much, but feeding the baby’s gut cells, keeping them going strong, but also appears to be disappearing from our species all over. And according to Bruce German, our main scientist, it is time to bring Bifid back.

AVIR: At this point, Bruce goes from being, like, just a normal scientist—show up to work, do your research—to becoming like a borderline evangelist.

LULU: [laughs] Okay.

AVIR: Like, he—you know, his daughters won’t take him to the family dinners because this is, like, all he talks about. He told me that.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: You know, he’s like, he sees a baby in a stroller across the street, he’s gonna, like, sprint over to the baby, throw some Bifidobacterium at them. And he actually mortgages his house and gets his co-workers to do the same. They sell the boat, do all these things to start their own startup to sell Bifidobacterium.

LULU: Whoa!

AVIR: Right.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: Which you can buy and which we may or may not have …

LULU: Ooh!

AVIR: … for you to try.

LULU: And this is just like he’s selling bacteria in a jar?

AVIR: Bacteria in a jar.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: Yeah.

LULU: Okay, now at this point in the show, I just need to pop out and say Avir told a story that honestly I have not been able to shake since that night. And it’s kind of like the story of Shara and her baby, but on steroids. And it starts when Bruce and his team connect with a guy named Brian Scadalini.

AVIR: Brian Scadalini is an MD/PhD, and he’s a neonatologist who works at OHSU in Portland. So he’s working there, and as a neonatologist, it’s a beautiful thing because you get to see these little tiny preemies grow into, like, full-fledged adults. But there is one thing that’s, like, the worst thing that happens in NICUs, and basically that’s this.

LULU: So Avir was showing us this picture. It’s like a CT scan kind of thing, and you can sort of tell that it’s like this scan of a gut, but it seems to be, like, almost ballooned out.

AVIR: So what we’re looking at is a preemie’s belly.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And it’s filled with gas, it’s very distended. And this baby’s not doing well. This is called “necrotizing enterocolitis,” also known as NEC. And basically what’s going on is, like, a bacteria, an adult bacteria has somehow made its way into the baby’s gut, has sort of bloomed and taken over, and is, like, completely destroying the gut wall, producing all this gas and all these bad things.

LULU: Huh. That looks painful, scary. I mean …

AVIR: Very scary.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: Yeah. I mean, when I was a resident, I rotated in NICUs, and it’s terrifying, because these preemies can go from being normal, and then overnight they can totally crash and get this. And the mortality is very high once they get this.

LULU: Oh yikes!

AVIR: So Brian gets sort of wind of this bacteria, and they both have this thought, “Well, maybe we could try Bifidobacterium.”

LULU: In—in the preemies?

AVIR: In the preemies.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: He gets some of the Bifidobacterium from Bruce and the team and the company, and he just starts giving this to the babies.

LULU: Without checking with parents or …

AVIR: Right. Pretty much like, “This is on formulary now. We’re gonna give it to them.”

LULU: I’m having mixed emotions about this idea. But …

AVIR: Sure.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: Yeah, I agree.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And, you know, you gotta think he’s not just waiting until they get NEC to give it to them. He’s giving it to all the preemies, like even the ones that would be fine without it.

LULU: It’s like a preventative measure.

AVIR: Preventative. Exactly, preventative.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: And lo and behold, he finds that the incidents of NEC goes from 11 percent down to 2 percent.

LULU: It was actually 2.7 percent.

AVIR: Insane!

LULU: That’s huge.

AVIR: Yeah.

LULU: Okay.

[applause]

AVIR: And this goes on for years.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: There is, in fact, years that go by that they don’t see a single incidence of this.

LULU: Of NEC in the NICU?

AVIR: Right. In the NICU. He publishes about it, gains some momentum.

LULU: And he’s sprinkling Bifid this whole time?

AVIR: Yeah, just sprinkling.

LULU: Okay. Okay.

AVIR: This was in—well, he’s—we’ll get to that. So he does this and yeah, he finds that it’s working. Other NICUs are starting to take this up.

LULU: Okay.

AVIR: So anyway, I’ve been talking about Brian enough. I want to bring Brian up himself. So Brian, if you’re here, let’s bring you up.

LULU: All right. Let’s get some play-on music. Come on down!

AVIR: Thank you, Brian.

BRIAN SCADALINI: Hi everybody.

AVIR: You just flew in today, just landed.

BRIAN SCADALINI: I did.

AVIR: So you had this really incredible result when you studied Bifidobacterium. I mean, truly incredible, and it seemed like it was spreading. But I guess I wanted to ask you, like, what happened next?

BRIAN SCADALINI: Well as—as Avir was saying, for years our incidents of necrotizing enterocolitis was quite low. And so we started in 2018 to answer that question, and then we had to stop in 2023.

AVIR: Tell me about that.

BRIAN SCADALINI: So for years, even well before me, neonatal intensive care units throughout the world, in Europe and in Australia, almost every premature baby gets a probiotic, gets a bacteria that is like this, including this one, Bifidobacterium infantis, to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis. So I wasn’t as crazy as it might have sounded to start using it in our NICU.

AVIR: A little crazy. A little crazy.

BRIAN SCADALINI: But we were the first ones to use it alone. So our team decided this bacteria makes sense because of its symbiosis with milk, and so we thought we should use this to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis. But what happened, as you might expect, whenever you introduce a bacterium into somebody, whether it’s us or babies, and especially babies with an immature immune system, there is a risk that it will find its way into their bloodstream.

BRIAN SCADALINI: Now if you ask me if I’m gonna choose between a pathogen and Bifidobacterium infantis, which has no antibiotic resistance, and is meant to be in milk or in the gut to metabolize HMOs—which cannot be metabolized by us, remember that—I will choose B. infantis. And so unfortunately, some babies got B. infantis in their bloodstream and had positive blood cultures, meaning that when they looked ill, they had a blood—a sample of blood taken and then was grown to see if the infantis was there.

BRIAN SCADALINI: I might add that other bacteria that have been used as probiotics have also found their way into the bloodstream. The FDA knew that NICUs throughout the United States were using this to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis, and decided with the instance of a bloodstream infection, that all the NICUs in the United States needed to stop using probiotics to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis. This is essentially what’s like a cease-and-desist letter. You can read this letter and see there isn’t a risk department in a hospital that’s gonna continue to use this with the FDA saying, “You shall not use this without an investigational new drug status.”

AVIR: So you get this letter, and I imagine you have some complicated feelings, because it’s like—I don’t know, we could understand where the FDA is coming from.

LULU: I’m a little onside FDA.

AVIR: But at the same time, you’re working hands on with these babies and you’re seeing amazing results. So, like, what’s going through your mind?

BRIAN SCADALINI: The first was, “Oh, crap,” but a stronger word than that, because in the risk-benefit, we saw necrotizing enterocolitis, we’d get two or three babies die per year, and for several years, no baby that was born in our hospital died from necrotizing enterocolitis. So on one hand, I felt like babies were going to die now. I—I hate this disease, I can’t tell you how much I hate this disease, and I hate seeing babies die in four hours, six hours, they’re dead. And the impact it has on their parents, versus a rare risk like this. So that was going through my mind. But on the other hand, it was sort of like what you were talking about Lulu. It was sort of like, well, we were using something to treat, prevent or mitigate a disease, which is a drug. And therefore I see the FDA’s point. So I was of split minds.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: What happened once you removed this bacteria?

BRIAN SCADALINI: Unfortunately, we are working on reporting this, but our necrotizing enterocolitis rate has come right back to where it was before, in fact, probably a little bit higher than it was before.

AVIR: So I guess where do you go from here? What are you trying to do now?

BRIAN SCADALINI: Well, we suspect this is happening throughout the United States, so we hope to be one of the first to report this. But since that time, we’ve been working with the FDA to try to have this become a drug, which is not the most simple pathway, and costs a lot of money to develop a drug. Investors are scared of premature babies. They’re afraid of pediatrics in general, and they’re really afraid of preterm babies, and so it’s a struggle to try to make this continue to move forward. And the only thing that keeps the folks who work on it working on it as a large team is the fact that at least in our hands it works.

AVIR: Okay, Brian, stay here on stage. Thanks, Brian, for being here.

LULU: Yeah.

[applause]

AVIR: Okay, so just to advance the story from here, Brian gets this result. Bruce has this company. He still really believes in it, but unfortunately his company sort of now has a scarlet A, and they have to sort of short sell to stay afloat. And so they lose—Bruce and his team sort of lose stake in the company. They’re still—you know, he still has his job. He’s not, like, on the streets, but things aren’t looking too good. So—but Bruce still—and I’ve spoken to Bruce for hours. He’s still positive about it, he’s still hopeful. And so anyway, I’ve been gatekeeping this guy Bruce long enough. Let’s bring him up to the stage, Bruce German.

LULU: Bruce!

AVIR: Hi.

LULU: Okay, Bruce, I’ve got a question. Going all the way back to that global poop hunt—I don’t know if that’s what you called it in your papers, but our shorthand—do we have any clue, like, why in the places like Denmark and most of the US, except the Mennonite communities and Switzerland—like, why—where was the Bifid going? Why did we lose it if it seems like it is such a harmonious thing in a baby gut?

BRUCE GERMAN: First I should say that—that this is the work of literally over a hundred people for 20 years. And I know I’m obviously distractingly tall and good-looking.

LULU: [laughs]

BRUCE GERMAN: But really, it’s this diversity of scientists from around the campus of UC-Davis who have brought this science forward. And that’s one of the critical questions where you need multiple disciplines. Because it’s a mutualism, what we would call a synergy. Oligosaccharides don’t do much by themselves. The baby poops them out. Bifidobacterium infantis doesn’t do much all by itself. The baby poops it out. But you put them together and that’s the magic, and away it goes. But babies are born sterile.

LULU: Completely? No microbiome in there?

BRUCE GERMAN: They’re sterile. Mother, you are keeping your baby sterile.

LULU: Huh!

BRUCE GERMAN: But needless to say, the minute they’re born, they are being inoculated from bacteria all over.

LULU: Wow.

BRUCE GERMAN: If there is no Bifidobacteria infantis in their environment, they cannot get Bifidobacteria infantis.

LULU: Hmm.

BRUCE GERMAN: If mothers can’t breastfeed, then they don’t get the oligosaccharides. They don’t survive. No Bifidobacteria in the baby.

LULU: No fish food for the bacteria.

BRUCE GERMAN: No. Nothing. If the mother gets antibiotics, kills Bifidobacteria, and that mother will never have Bifidobacteria again, unless she somehow gets re-inoculated. One step in any of those directions ends the story, and it’s been happening over a century. Mothers are losing the ability to pass on the bacteria.

AVIR: You know, you—another part of this is formula doesn’t have these alien sugars.

BRUCE GERMAN: No.

AVIR: And it’s not able to feed these bacteria, so the bacteria get starved. And I will say, you won’t admit this but, you know, part of his evangelism was that he would email all the formula makers, and be like, “Can I meet with you?” And he would get some meetings with these formula makers. And my impression was they were sort of like, “Thank you, sir. Here’s security, please leave.”

[laughter]

AVIR: I’m exaggerating. But lo and behold, a few years ago, all the major formula makers have added these alien sugars into the formula. I’m crediting you with that.

BRUCE GERMAN: I mean, it turns out that there are dozens.

LULU: That’s great. That’s great!

[applause]

BRUCE GERMAN: There are dozens of different oligosaccharides. And so far, industrially they can only make a couple. And you need a lot. Remember you pointed out there’s more of this than protein. Evolution is saying it’s as important to feed the bacteria in the baby as the baby.

AVIR: Right.

BRUCE GERMAN: So—so we need to get a lot more.

AVIR: Okay. Well, I think one question I had is sort of, you know, you look at the pH changing and the poops changing over the centuries. Like, I can’t help but think this correlates so well with the rise of, like, childhood autoimmune diseases and, like, these chronic diseases. I just wanted to—is there something there?

BRUCE GERMAN: Yeah, we’ve been studying that, and the strength of the immune system is it’s so personal. The benefit of that is your immune system can learn to attack diseases your parents never had. There’s a flaw—is your immune system has to develop, be educated in the first few weeks of life. And the immune system is basically located in your gut, for sort of obvious reasons. It’s paying attention to the environment through the bacteria. If the bacteria are appropriate—Bifidobacterium infantis—then it’s clear that the immune system is developing appropriately. But if the gut is full of inappropriate bacteria, now the immune system is being miseducated. The result of that is, with Bifidobacterium infantis, it’s clear, it’s an intelligent immune system. If it doesn’t, then it’s not an intelligent immune system.

AVIR: What does that mean, “intelligent immune system?”

BRUCE GERMAN: It makes mistakes. So an immune system can make two kinds of mistakes. It can say, “There is danger. Don’t worry about it.” The other kind of mistake is, “It’s perfectly benign. I should attack it as if it was dangerous.” And that’s what—autoimmune disease. When someone doesn’t have Bifidobacterium infantis, their immune system is not developing appropriately. That means it’s greater risk. Doesn’t mean they’re gonna get autoimmune disease but they’re at greater risk of having it. We now have very convincing data that a part of the problem with autoimmune disease is the bacteria in your gut in this early developmental stage—and lo and behold, throughout human history, Bifidobacterium infantis, that’s been the one. It’s been predicted that if we had not found it, it would probably have been extinct within the next generation. It wouldn’t have been findable at all in—in a few years.

AVIR: You know, I just think it’s crazy that there’s this, like, Y-shaped bacteria, right? That no one ever paid attention to, that we almost wiped off the face of the Earth by accident, that basically has this completely symbiotic relationship with us. I mean, like, you know, we—obviously in school we learn about, like, the birds and the bees and pollination and coral and algae. But, like, who knew that, like, our babies have symbiotic relationships with this random bacteria? Like that’s Sylvie. That’s Lulu’s baby.

LULU: My baby.

AVIR: Like, Sylvie is a symbiote with these bacteria. I mean, it’s blowing my mind. And if you really think back, like, if you really go back in time, let’s go back 500,000 years, which is when we broke off to become human. Bruce was telling me, if you go back, you know, to trace the genetic lineage of Bifidobacterium infantis, it broke off from its predecessor at exactly the same time. Which to me is crazy, because that means, like, we have literally co-evolved with this bacteria. I mean, like, come on! Like, this is our best friend. This is, like, our oldest and best friend that we’ve ever had.

LULU: Okay Avir, can we—can we—sorry, can we scratch the emo music? Okay, I mean, you—you put a picture of my baby up, and it’s a beautiful thought but we’re tell—you’ve gathered, like, a sad story here. I mean, Brian was shut down, the study was shut down, who knows how long—if it’s ever gonna go. I mean, Bruce is eloquent, but his business sounds kind of on the rocks.

[laughter]

LULU: And I feel like—and then, even if we could get it back, there are all kinds of parents who can’t breastfeed for different reasons—economic reasons, body reasons, whatever it may be. So, like, aren’t we just being kept away from this majestic, beautiful friend? Aren’t we just—isn’t this just sad? And we’re doomed to be unhealthy?

BRUCE GERMAN: Got it. At this point in time, no.

LULU: Okay.

BRUCE GERMAN: If you look back at the history of scientific discoveries, especially related to health, they’re always turbulent. This is a fundamentally different way of thinking. It’s now been shown that babies with Bifidobacterium infantis respond better to a vaccine than babies who haven’t. So that’s not just protection, that’s enhancing health in ways we didn’t even think about before. If you look back how science moves, it’s moving inexorably forward. It’s just a matter of time.

LULU: Okay, this guy can milk hope out of any situation, I guess.

[laughter]

AVIR: Another pun. Well, I guess with that, you know, we only have one thing left to do, honestly, is we have the Bifidobacterium here. We’re gonna try some.

LULU: Yeah.

AVIR: No pressure obviously, but if you guys want to try some we can all cheers to Bifid together. Just talk to your bartender. They’re gonna be bringing them out.

LULU: Okay we’re gonna start passing it. Raise your hand if you want it. Once again, you do not have to. Radiolab doesn’t necessarily condone it.

LATIF: Wait, you had the Bifid there? Was it—was it alive?

LULU: Yeah, it was the real stuff. It’ll bloom if you drink it. It was like in these little bags. It’s kind of this—just like the smelly powders that Shara had.

LATIF: Wow! What did it smell like?

LULU: It was like fishtank-lite?

LATIF: [laughs]

LULU: You know?

LATIF: Sure!

LULU: And we mixed it in with some water, and handed out shots.

LATIF: Oh, wow!

LULU: To anyone who wanted. And while we were handing out these little shot cups, I made the band jam out along with …

LULU: And I think we need to bring in an instrument that has never been played on Radiolab ever before. Hold on. Can you mic me? Okay.

LULU: … my breastbone.

LATIF: Wow!

LULU: Okay. So, okay.

AVIR: Breastbone remix.

LULU: Come forward.

LULU: It was not hooked up. It was not all the way hooked up.

LATIF: You weren’t pumping.

LULU: I wasn’t actually pumping milk.

AVIR: It’s very goth—industrial goth vibe.

LULU: Yeah, it’s a little steampunk. Oh my God, this sound, again and again. Why capitalism, why?

AVIR: Don’t drink it yet. We’re gonna drink it together. We’re gonna drink it together.

LULU: We’re gonna do it together.

LATIF: Did people want it, actually?

LULU: A lot of people. Yeah, I think most people did it.

AVIR: Turn that music down. All right, cheers, everyone.

LULU: Cheers! Okay, we really do it? Okay.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: What did we actually drink just now?

LULU: Straight up bacteria. Who just asked? Yeah, you just ingested, like—I don’t know—is it powder? Dried bacteria? It’s those little Y-shapes. What did we drink, Bruce?

BRUCE GERMAN: Yeah, Bifidobacterium longum, subspecies infantis.

LULU: Okay.

LULU: Like, as I drank this stuff down, I thought about how we were all in the room at that moment literally physically reuniting with this bacteria that we have been with for so long, that we might be starting to lose. But the more I started thinking about that whole chain of things that Bifid do in a baby’s body, I realized I actually had one last question for Bruce.

LULU: So this is sort of an emotional question, but in this moment of breastfeeding, which I have found to be one of the most, like, connecting experiences of my life, you’re saying what’s happening is the baby, which used to be inside me is learning—it’s building itself away from me, from other things. Like, it’s actually a physiological moment of a wall being built of disconnection.

BRUCE GERMAN: [laughs] Well, it’s true, but …

LULU: Okay.

[laughter]

BRUCE GERMAN: But you’re paying forward so that that infant can be successful. The genius of milk is we tended to think milk is protective. Of course. Darwin, survival. It’s more than that. Evolution is driving not just survival, it’s success lifelong. What you’re doing is providing the means for your baby to be successful its whole life.

LULU: Yeah, blah blah blah. Give ’em roots and wings so they can fly away. I only heard the first part, I’m sad. Go evolution. Okay.

LATIF: Well, despite your sadness, that story was great. That was a really fun event. I never heard any of that. Thank you for playing it for us. And thank you also to Avir and to Bifid.

LULU: Yes. And, you know, I should say this was not our first live show that we have done with Avir. You, of course, did one last summer called “How to Save a Life.”

LATIF: Yeah, yeah, yeah. That was the CPR one.

LULU: Mm-hmm.

LATIF: And we—that was also a blast. It also ended with music. We had the entire audience learning how to do CPR at the end to the perfect beats per minute of “Stayin’ Alive.”

LULU: Mm-hmm. They’ve been really, really fun, and we are thinking of these live shows with Avir as a series that we’re calling Viscera.

LATIF: Mm-hmm.

LULU: Because every story is about something going on in your body, in your viscera, and it will have some kind of visceral experience.

LATIF: Yeah, so if you do—if you do have a body, want to learn more about it, keep an eye out. We’ll, like—maybe we’re coming to a city near you.

LULU: Yup!

LATIF: And last thing, thanks, Lulu. We gotta do the thanks.

LULU: No, we already did them on stage.

LULU: Okay. Well, it is time now …

LATIF: All right, no problem. Okay, my work day is done.

LULU: [laughs]

LULU: As someone once said, if you want to hide a piece of information, put it in the credits to a podcast, because no one will listen. And yet you’re all stuck here! So okay, so huge thank you—he’s not even on here, but to Avir Mitra for bringing us this story.

[applause]

LULU: To Bruce German, to Brian Scadalini, right here on stage, too. Shara Sheldon and all her hijinks. To our musicians, Dylan Keefe and Ivan Baren. Biggest thank you to the Radiolab team lurking in the background. Stand up. Harry Fortuna, Sarah Sandbach, Soren Wheeler, Pat Walters, Anisa Vietze, Jeremy Bloom and George Wellington.

LULU: Speaking of Radiolab, I would like two OG members, Robert Krulwich and Ellen Horne to stand up—our original executive producer. They are here. We love you. None of us would be here without you. Everybody here at Caveat, thank you for bringing us here. Tip your waiters, order more drinks. We would love to come back. And finally, of course, to our Radiolab members who sat—there are people watching us on a screen. Hi! In fact, they’re still there. Thanks. You make everything we do possible. And now, Avir, you have a couple, and I need someone else to read the very last thing. We need a listener. Anyone? An audience member willing to—okay, come on down.

AVIR: So, quick thank-yous. This story actually came to me from a Radiolab listener named Tim Brown. So cool. So thanks to him for sharing this story. David Mills, Carlito Lebrilla, Bethany Henrik, Danielle Lemay, Katie Hinde, Jennifer Smilowitz, Angela Zivkovic, Daniela Barile and Mark Underwood—all the scientists involved in this research that I wasn’t able to shout out before.

LISTENER: Hi. I’m Alexa Petrie and I’m from Halifax, Nova Scotia and here are the staff credits. Radiolab was created by Jad Abumrad, and is edited by Soren Wheeler. Lulu Miller and Latif Nasser are our co-hosts. Dylan Keefe is our director of sound design. Our staff includes Simon Adler, Jeremy Bloom, Becca Bressler, W. Harry Fortuna, David Gebel, Maria Paz Gutiérrez, Sindhu Gnanasambandan, Matt Kielty, Annie McEwen, Alex Neason, Sarah Qari, Sarah Sandbach, Anisa Vietze, Arianne Wack, Pat Walters and Molly Webster. Our fact-checkers are Diane Kelly, Emily Krieger, and Natalie Middleton.

[applause]

LULU: Well done! Thank you all!

AVIR: Thank you so much!

LULU: Have a great night!

[LISTENER: Hi, this is Laura calling from Cleveland, Ohio. Leadership support for Radiolab’s science programming is provided by the Simons Foundation and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.]


-30-

Copyright © 2025 New York Public Radio. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use at www.wnyc.org for further information.

 New York Public Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline, often by contractors. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of programming is the audio record.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

24-3-02379-7 Urajhia Leyaona Bailey v Michael Javon Agosto

Pierce County Superior Court Civil Case 24-3-02379-7 Purchase Copies 
Case Title:AURAJHIA LEYAONA BAILEY VS. MICHAEL JAVON AGOSTO
Case Type:Parenting Plan\Child Support
Access:Public
Track Assignment:Res Schedule-Parenting Plan
Jury Size:
Estimated Trial Length:
Dept Judge:FAMILY COURT – 1
Resolution:
Completion:
 Litigants
NameTypeStatus 
BAILEY, AURAJHIA LEYAONAPetitioner 
 Attorney for BAILEY, AURAJHIA LEYAONATypeBar Number Julie C. RhoAtty for Plaintiff/Petitioner36771
AGOSTO, MAKAI JAKOBEMinor 
BRAYLOCK-AGOSTO, MICHAEL JAVONMinor 
BRAYLOCK-AGOSTO, MIEIRIE J-LEEMinor 
AGOSTO, MICHAEL JAVONRespondent 
 Filings  e-file document  download filings  e-serve documents 
Filing DateFilingAccessPagesMicrofilm
07/31/2024  FILING FEE RECEIVED $260.00Public0
1 07/31/2024  CASE INFORMATION COVER SHEETPublic1
2 07/31/2024  ASSIGNED TO MATTHEW HUMMEL THOMASPublic1
3 07/31/2024  SUMMONSPublic3
4 07/31/2024  PETITION FOR RESIDENTIAL SCH/PARENTING PLAN/CHILD SUPPORTPublic8
5 07/31/2024  SEALED COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE(S)Confidential8
6 07/31/2024  PROPOSED PARENTING PLANPublic10
7 07/31/2024  NOTICE RE: DEPENDENT OF MILITARY PERSONPublic2
8 10/07/2024  CORRESPONDENCEPublic1
9 10/18/2024  DECLARATION OF MAUREEN PARKERPublic4
10 10/28/2024  SEALED CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS 18-2-01379-3Confidential21
11 10/28/2024  SEALED CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS 24-2-01707-6Confidential53
12 10/28/2024  DECLARATION OF KHALILAH BRAYLOCKPublic3
13 10/28/2024  DECLARATION OF PETITIONER IN SUPPORTPublic7
14 10/28/2024  MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR TEMPORARY ORDERPublic5
15 12/03/2024  ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE ADDENDUMPublic1
16 12/03/2024  ORDER SETTING ORIGINAL CASE SCHEDULEPublic1
17 12/16/2024  NOTE FOR COMMISSIONERS CALENDARPublic2
18 12/23/2024  HEARING INFORMATION FORMPublic1
19 01/16/2025  AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION OF DUE DILIGENCEPublic7
20 01/27/2025  NOTE FOR COMMISSIONERS CALENDARPublic2
21 03/03/2025  ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE ADDENDUMPublic1
22 03/03/2025  ORDER SETTING ORIGINAL CASE SCHEDULEPublic1
23 03/03/2025  COPY(S) OF EMAIL(S)Public3
04/23/2025  EX PARTE PRESENTATION FEE $40.00Public0
24 04/23/2025  MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT RE: SERVICEPublic3
25 04/23/2025  ORDER RE: SERVICEPublic3
26 05/23/2025  RESPONSEPublic5
27 06/13/2025  ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE ADDENDUMPublic1
28 06/13/2025  ORDER SETTING ORIGINAL CASE SCHEDULEPublic1
29 07/16/2025  ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE ADDENDUMPublic1
30 07/16/2025  ORDER SETTING ORIGINAL CASE SCHEDULEPublic1
31 08/21/2025  ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE ADDENDUMPublic1
32 08/21/2025  ORDER SETTING ORIGINAL CASE SCHEDULEPublic1
33 08/21/2025  ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICEPublic3
34 09/26/2025  ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE ADDENDUMPublic1
35 09/26/2025  COPY(S) OF EMAIL(S)Public3
36 09/26/2025  ASSIGNMENT TO FAMILY COURT 1Public1
37 09/26/2025  ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULEPublic1
Proceedings
DateCalendarOutcome
12/06/2024DEPT 13 – JUDGE THOMAS (Rm. 533 )Continued
Confirmed9:00 Assignment to Set Trial Date 
01/27/2025C1- SHOW CAUSE/FAMILY LAW (Rm. 100 )Cancel via Web-Rescheduled
Confirmed9:00 Motion – Temporary Order 
Scheduled By: Julie Rho
03/07/2025DEPT 13 – JUDGE THOMAS (Rm. 533 )Continued
Confirmed9:00 Assignment to Set Trial Date 
03/24/2025C5 – SHOW CAUSE/FAMILY LAW (Rm. 127 )Cancel via Web-Issue resolved
Confirmed9:00 Motion – Temporary OrderWorking Copies Provided
Scheduled By: Julie Rho
04/23/2025C4 – EXPARTE CALENDAR (Rm. 129 )Held – Motion
Unconfirmed8:30 Exparte Action Mail 
Scheduled By: Julie Rho
06/13/2025DEPT 13 – JUDGE THOMAS (Rm. 533 )Continued
Confirmed9:00 Assignment to Set Trial Date 
07/25/2025DEPT 13 – JUDGE THOMAS (Rm. 533 )Continued
Confirmed9:00 Assignment to Set Trial Date 
08/22/2025DEPT 13 – JUDGE THOMAS (Rm. 533 )Continued
Confirmed9:00 Assignment to Set Trial Date 
10/03/2025FAMILY LAW COURT – ONE (Rm. 2-E )Cancelled/Amend Case Sched
Confirmed9:00 Assignment to Set Trial Date 
02/19/2026FAMILY LAW COURT – ONE (Rm. 2-E )
Confirmed8:45 Status Conference 
04/07/2026FAMILY LAW COURT – ONE (Rm. 2-E )
Confirmed9:00 Trial 
  Pending Case Schedule Items
EventSchedule Date
Certificate of Parenting Class – Petitioner’s (Must be filed on or before)10/02/2024
Certificate of Parenting Class – Respondent’s (Must be filed on or before)10/02/2024
Plaintiff’s/Petitioner’s Disclosure of Primary Witnesses12/02/2025
Defendant’s/Respondent’s Disclosure of Primary Witnesses12/23/2025
Disclosure of Rebuttal Witnesses01/06/2026
Deadline for Filing Motion to Adjust Trial Date01/20/2026
Status Conference02/19/2026
Discovery Cutoff03/10/2026
Exchange of Witness and Exhibit Lists and Documentary Exhibits03/24/2026
Trial04/07/2026
 Judgments
Cause #StatusSignedEffectiveFiled
This calendar lists Confirmed and Unconfirmed Proceedings. Attorneys may obtain access rights to confirm/strike selected proceedings. Currently, any proceedings for the Commissioners’ calendars can be stricken, but only Show Cause proceedings for the Commissioners’ calendars can be confirmed. Unconfirmed Proceedings will not be heard unless confirmed as required by the Local Rules of the Superior Court for Pierce County .
Hearing and location information displayed in this calendar is subject to change without notice. Any changes to this information after the creation date and time may not display in current version.Confidential cases and Juvenile Offender proceeding information is not displayed on this calendar. Confidential case types are: Adoption, Paternity, Involuntary Commitment, Dependency, and Truancy.The names provided in this calendar cannot be associated with any particular individuals without individual case research.Neither the court nor clerk makes any representation as to the accuracy and completeness of the data except for court purposes.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

25-2-00358-23 Star Lake Community Club v Cesar Varela

Case Information

25-2-00358-23 | STAR LAKE COMMUNITY CLUB vs CESAR VARELA et al

Case Number
25-2-00358-23

Court
Mason

File Date
06/04/2025

Case Type
FOR Foreclosure

Case Status
Active

Party

Plaintiff
STAR LAKE COMMUNITY CLUB

Active Attorneys

Lead Attorney

Dille, Bryce Haggard
Retained

Bryce Dille, esq.
Bryce Dille, atty & unlicensed collection agency

Bryce Haggard Dille

License Number:2862
License Type:Lawyer
License Status:Active
Eligible To Practice:Yes
WSBA Admit Date: 9/19/1966

Contact Information

Public/Mailing Address:Dille Law PLLC
1800 Cooper Point Rd SW Ste 11
Olympia, WA 98502-1179
United States
Email:bryce@dillelaw.com
Phone:(360) 350-0270
Fax:(253) 845-4941
Website:www.cdb-law.com
TDD:

Professional Liability Insurance

Private Practice:Yes
Has Insurance?Yes – Click for more info
Last Updated:1/16/2025 8:00:00 AM

Current Volunteer Service

Member of the following groups:

Board of Bar ExaminersMemberOctober 2023 — September 2027

Volunteer Service History

GroupPositionStart DateEnd Date
Real Property, Probate & Trust Section Executive CommitteeReal Property Council Member10/1/20219/30/2023
Limited Practice BoardMember1/1/200512/31/2008
WSBA Board of GovernorsWA Congressional District 910/1/20019/30/2004
Disciplinary BoardMember10/1/19969/30/1999
Disciplinary BoardMember1/1/19969/30/1997

Not all WSBA volunteer service will appear here, especially for service on committees/boards that are not standing or for service prior to 1990. (Exception: Service on Board of Governors is captured back through the 1800s.)

Sections

Member of these sections:

Elder Law Section, Real Property Probate and Trust Section, Senior Lawyers Section

Disciplinary History

In some cases, discipline search results will not reveal all disciplinary action relating to a Washington licensed legal professional, and may not display links to the official decision documents.

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED VOLUNTARILY BY THE LICENSED LEGAL PROFESSIONAL. THE INFORMATION MIGHT BE INCOMPLETE, INACCURATE, AND/OR OUT OF DATE.

Practice Information Identified by Legal Professional

Firm or Employer:Dille Law PLLC
Office Type and Size:Law firm with 2-5 WSBA members
Practice Areas:Estate Planning/ Probate/ Wills, Real Property

Defendant
VARELA, CESAR


Defendant
VARELA, JANE DOE

Events and Hearings

  • 1 06/04/2025 Case Information Cover Sheet View Document Case Information Cover Sheet
  • 2 06/04/2025 Summons View Document Summons
  • 3 06/04/2025 Complaint View Document Complaint
  • 4 07/14/2025 Request View Document RequestComment
    TO PAUSE LIEN PROCESS AND APPOINT AN INTERPRETER
  • 5 07/15/2025 Motion and Affidavit Declaration View Document Motion and Affidavit Declaration Comment
    TO PAUSE LIEN ON PROPERTY
  • 6 07/15/2025 Declaration of Mailing View Document Declaration of Mailing
  • 7 07/15/2025 Summons by Publication View Document Summons by Publication
  • 8 07/15/2025 Affidavit View Document Affidavit Comment
    OF BRYCE H. DILLE IN SUPPORT OF PUBLICATION
  • 9 07/15/2025 Affidavit of Diligence View Document Affidavit of Diligence

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Multi-Million E$tate Hans Carl Stoker trust irregularities

Case Information

23-4-00859-34 | Estate of HANS CARL STOKER

Case Number
23-4-00859-34

Court
Thurston

File Date
09/14/2023

Case Type
EST Estate

Case Status
Completed/Re-Completed

Party

Petitioner
STOKER, KATHRYN LORENE

Active Attorneys

Lead Attorney

Worth, Cynthia Sue

Retained



Deceased [& incinerated]
STOKER, HANS CARL

Events and Hearings

9 23.9.18 Hans Death Cert 0859
  • 1 09/14/2023 Case Information Cover Sheet View Document Case Information Cover Sheet
  • 2 09/14/2023 Petition for Probate of Will View Document Petition for Probate of Will
  • 3 09/14/2023 Last Will and Testament View Document Last Will and Testament
  • 4 09/14/2023 Oath View Document Oath
  • 5 09/14/2023 Notice of Appointment and Pendency of Probate View Document Notice of Appointment and Pendency of Probate
  • 6 09/14/2023 Notice to Creditors View Document Notice to Creditors
  • 7 09/14/2023 Order Admitting Will Appt Personal Representative Adj Solv View Document Order Admitting Will Appt Personal Representative Adj Solv
  • 09/14/2023 Ex Parte Action With Order
  • 09/14/2023 Case Resolution Personal Representative Guardian Appointed
  • 8 9 09/14/2023 Affidavit of Mailing View Document Affidavit of Mailing
  • 9 09/18/2023 Certified Copy of Death Certificate View Document Certified Copy of Death Certificate
  • 10 09/19/2023 Notice to Creditors View Document Notice to Creditors
  • 11 09/20/2023 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Probate Documents
  • 12 09/20/2023 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Probate Documents
  • 13 09/20/2023 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    Kat Stoker
  • 14 09/25/2023 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    John Stoker
  • 15 09/25/2023 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    Chad Stoker
  • 16 10/06/2023 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Alexander Karst Stoker
  • 17 02/08/2024 Declaration of Completion View Document Declaration of Completion Comment
    of Inventory
  • 18 05/08/2024 Affidavit of Publication View Document Affidavit of Publication
  • 19 03/26/2025 Declaration of Completion View Document Declaration of Completion
  • 20 03/26/2025 Notice of Filing Declaration of Completion View Document Notice of Filing Declaration of Completion
  • 21 03/26/2025 Declaration of Mailing View Document Declaration of Mailing
  • 22 04/04/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of John Stoker
  • 23 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Lorene Stoker
  • 24 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 25 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 26 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 27 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 28 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 29 04/21/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 30 04/22/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Kathryn Stoker
  • 31 04/24/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Chad Stoker
  • 32 04/24/2025 Receipts View Document Receipts Comment
    of Chad Stoker

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Judith Guinn v William Kuenniger #24-3-00791-22

Case Information

Judith Guinn
Judith Guinn
Trisha Guinn
Trisha Guinn
Trisha Guinn
Trisha Guinn

24-3-00791-22 | JUDITH GUINN and WILLIAM KUENNIGER
Case filed in Lincoln Countyh on 6-3-2024; (509)725-1401
Judith’s Atty: Maxey, Mason Jerome, Retained (509)326-0338 #56935
1835 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99201-1819
masonm@maxeylaw.com & riccik@maxeylaw.com fax:(509)325-4490

Bill’s Atty: Alek Christopher Reiber (509)252-3013, #61303 $6,000
Hughes & Nelson, 505 W Riverside Ave Ste 600,
Spokane, WA 99201-0513
alek@hughesnelsonlaw.com

Itemization (15″ minimum@ $100/hr)
00.25′ 25.4.18 @ ~6:55pm phone w/B. Kuenniger
00.50 25.4.15 @ 9:41am w/Mason Maxey, atty (settlement offer, discovery)
00.25′ Phone w/Judith Guinn (Settlement Offer)
00.50′ 25.4.7 @ OCCU w/Bill Kuenigger
00.50′ Tue, Mar 18, 2025, 12:42 PM phone w/Bill Kuenniger
04.00′ 25.3.5 Collating, Reformatting, Organizing, Posting case files & records
00.50′ Phone w/Lincoln Co. Clerk/Admin arranging Case records purchase
02.50′ Misc Phone calls w/Bill Kuenniger re case history & strategy/settlement
01.00′ Wed, 25.4.23 @ 12:45pm E-mail to Mason Jerome Maxey, atty, & Bill
03.00′ Wed, 25.4/23 @ 8:05pm Bank Statements collating and forensic analysis
01.50′ Thur, 25.4.24 @ 12:30am Typing & editing Interrogatory to Petitioner
00.25′ Thur, 25.4.24 @ 12:50am E-Mail to Respondent re Interrogatorry
01.50′ Thur, 25.4.24 @ 10:30am acquiring Gold Hill RE FMV, deed, sale history, data
01.00′ Fri, 25.4.25 @ 2:00pm phone reminding Bill of his duty to respond to interrogatory, com ply w/court process, furnish documents, provide list of all separate and community assets including mother’s will, any liens against her estate, social security statements calculating benefits based on his contributions, medical documents supporting his claims of fragile health needs along with unbroken 5 year history of bank records and explanation of the line items in said bank statements.

Case Number
24-3-00791-22

Court
Lincoln

File Date
06/03/2024

Case Type
DIN Dissolution of Marriage with No Children

Case Status
Active

Party

Respondent
KUENNIGER, WILLIAM JOSEPH


Petitioner
GUINN, JUDITH ALLISON

Active Attorneys

Lead Attorney

Maxey, Mason Jerome

Retained


Events and Hearings

  • 06/03/2024 Confidential Information Form
  • 2 06/03/2024 Petition for Dissolution (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 3 06/03/2024 Financial Declaration (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 4 06/14/2024 Summons (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 5 07/10/2024 Affidavit Declaration Certificate Confirmation of Service (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 6 07/16/2024 Notice of Appearance (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 7 09/13/2024 Motion for Temporary Order (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 8 09/13/2024 Financial Declaration Comment (VIEW DOCUMENT) AMENDED
  • 9 09/13/2024 Declaration Affidavit (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 10 09/13/2024 Declaration Affidavit Comment (VIEW DOCUMENT) OF BREANN ADAMS
  • 11 09/13/2024 Notice of Hearing (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 12 09/30/2024 Financial Declaration (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 13 10/07/2024 Declaration Affidavit Comment (VIEW DOCUMENT) RESPONSE DECLARATION
  • 10/08/2024 Temporary Order Judicial Officer Barkdull, Jeffrey S Hearing Time
    9:30 AM Cancel Reason Plaintiff/Prosecutor Requested
  • 14 10/14/2024 Order of Continuance (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 10/14/2024 Ex Parte Action With Order
  • 15 10/17/2024 Declaration Affidavit of Guinn (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 16 10/17/2024 Financial Declaration Comment (VIEW DOCUMENT) AMENDED
  • 17 10/17/2024 Sealed Financial Source Documents (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 10/22/2024 Temporary Order Judicial Officer Barkdull, Jeffrey S Hearing Time
    9:30 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance
  • 18 10/23/2024 Sealed Financial Source Documents (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 19 10/23/2024 Sealed Financial Source Documents (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 20 10/28/2024 Order of Continuance (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 21 10/28/2024 Ex Parte Action (Notes) With Order (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 10/29/2024 Temporary Order Judicial Officer Barkdull, Jeffrey S Hearing Time 9:30 AM
  • 10/29/2024 Motion Hearing
  • 22 10/31/2024 Temporary Family Law Order (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 10/31/2024 Ex Parte Action With Order
  • 23 02/12/2025 Notice of Intent to Withdraw (VIEW DOCUMENT)
  • 24 02/12/2025 Affidavit of Mailing (VIEW DOCUMENT)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cobb’s 24-2-00002-23 Order Moots 1st, 6th Amendments

Mason Superior CourtJudge Monty Cobb
Mason Superior CourtJudge Monty Cobb

Judge Cobb (while Brown, and Goodell were still sitting judges) signed an Order in 2024 restricting the public and Press from attending Superior Court hearings via Zoom video sessions. (Case #24-2-00002-23)

Judge Cobb excuses the public restriction citing lack of an explicit Constitutional mandate requiring Zoom sessions for the public/observers/press along with arguments citing the expense of Zoom subscriptions and maintaining control over courtroom proceedings. But, this is a very 20th Century argument at best–contrary to good public policy benefitting the community, litigants, and Court alike. The 6th and 1st Amendments are not discretionary or largesse belonging to the Court or even the litigants, but to the public intrinsically and inalienably. In the famous words of JFK’s inaugaurul address to Congress, “The rights of man do not flow from the largesse of government, but are endowed upon us by our Creator.”

The following case law and dissertation emphasizes the word ALL (see Jafar v. Webb, WA Supreme Court case about civil fees for access to justice; Abeda JAFAR, Petitioner, v. William Douglass WEBB, Respondent) in the context of a bar to restricting the public’s access to observe court proceedings according to strict scrutiny standartds. i.e. The state/government has a very heavy burden (strict scrutiny) to meet in demonstrating a compelling (but least restrictive) reason to attenuate the public’s right to observe all stages of court proceedings. Zoom sessions have become the optimal mode of accommodating the poor, the handicapped, the press, and medically vulnerable wishing to monitor the critical functions of the judiciary–the most expensive portion (58%) of Mason County’;s budget.

The fact judge Cobb finds Zoom sessions irritating is insufficient to overcome the public’s right to utilize what it has already paid for. Jails are expensive. Judges are expensive. Court appointed attorneys, clerks, computors and prosecutors are expensive. Yet they, along with a fair trial, are necessary. It is not enough that justice be done. It must be seen. Not only is fairness requuired, but the appearance of fairness. This is black letter law. It is not discretionary. The value of transparency also acts to temper the unbridled unaccountability of sitting judges. The public can watch, unhindered, the temperament and suitability of their elected judges. Mason County courts should encourage more transparency, not less. In the 21st Century, that means utilizing modern telecommunications video technology to transcend time and distance, minimizing public health/pandemic risks–democratizing access to the courts for even the least of citizens who otherwise would not have the means/ability to physically reach the threshold of the courthouse doors and beyond.

Please take the time to read and ponder the well stated arguments (below) favoring more transparent courtroom proceedings and meaningful access to those proceedings, expecially for the public.

Arguably, litigants, witnesses and their attorneys are required to personally attend court hearings to meet the confrontation clause of the Constitution. This is not a valid argument against the public’s right to observe the proceedings, even remotely.

The Court has seen fit to arraign defendants remotely for its own efficiency and to reduce expenses. Those same considerations should be given to the public’s right to observe courtroom proceedings. Bad things happen behind closed doors…even if they’re kept open a crack. Zoom sessions allow the public and sunlight to shine on proceedings that often affect entire families and communities. Consider voting a judge out of office who makes it more difficult for the public to observe court proceedings–including the attenuation of remote access through Zoom sessions. The public is entitled to what it has paid for despite the personal biases of judges who dislike the technology.

Case Information

24-2-00002-23 | ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS vs MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Case Number
24-2-00002-23

Court
Mason

File Date
01/02/2024

Case Type
MSC2 Miscellaneous – Civil

Case Status
Completed/Re-Completed

Party

Plaintiff
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS


Defendant
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Events and Hearings

  • 1 02/26/2024 Non Case Type Administrative Order View Document Non Case Type Administrative Order Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Comment
    THIRD AMENDED
  • 2 03/08/2024 Oath View Document Oath Comment
    Pro Tempore

Misc Order (Zoom session admiotance) 24-2-00002-23
Cobb criminal Zoom ID:907 729 4239
The Case of Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Ct., 457 U.S. 596 (1982)
Argued:March 29, 1982
Decided:June 23, 1982
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Ct., 457 U.S. 596 (1982)
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court
No. 81-611
Argued March 29, 1982
Decided June 23, 1982
457 U.S. 596

BACKGROUND AND LEGAL STANDARDS – PUBLIC RIGHT TO ACCESS TO REMOTE HEARINGS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/40364/RRT-Technology-Background-and-Legal-Standards-on-Public-Right-to-Access-to-Remote-Hearings.pdf

BACKGROUND AND LEGAL STANDARDS – PUBLIC RIGHT TO ACCESS TO REMOTE HEARINGS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC1
Many courts across the country have transitioned to conducting remote proceedings during the pandemic or restricting public access to courtrooms. As courts make this transition, many have considered the public’s right to reasonable notice and access to court proceedings, both civil and criminal, is consistent with traditional practice in state courts and with federal and state2
precedent as discussed below.

The 6th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States affords defendants the right to a public trial, including all phases of criminal cases.

The Supreme Court has also held that the press and public have a similar, independent right under the 1st Amendment to attend all criminal proceedings in both federal and state courts.3 Although the Supreme Court has never specifically held that the public has a First Amendment right of access to civil proceedings,4 federal and state courts that have considered the issue have overwhelmingly held that there is a public right to access in civil cases under the 1st Amendment.

Courts must ensure and accommodate public attendance at court hearings. However, although
constitutional in nature and origin, the right to public and open hearings is not absolute, and may be outweighed by other
_________________
1 The Texas Office of Court Administration wishes to thank District Judge Roy Ferguson (394th) for primary authorship on this
document.
2 State courts should review state precedent which may interpret state law or federal precedent as applicable to specific state court proceedings.
3 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980) (establishing that the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the public a right of access to judicial proceedings).
4 Although the holding is specific to the criminal case, the constitutional analysis in Richmond Newspapers applies similarly to civil cases. As Chief Justice Burger in the majority opinion opined, “What this means in the context of trials is that the First Amendment guarantees of speech and press, standing alone, prohibit government from summarily closing courtroom doors which had long been open to the public at the time that Amendment was adopted.” Id. at 576. In his concurrence, Justice Stevens wrote, “[T[he First Amendment protects the public and the press from abridgment of their rights of access to information about the operation of their government, including the judicial branch[.]” Justice Brennan added, “Even more significantly for our present purpose, […] open trials are bulwarks of our free and democratic government: public access to court proceedings is one of the numerous ‘checks and balances’ of our system, because ‘contemporaneous review in the forum of public opinion is an effective restraint on possible abuse of judicial power[.]’” Id. And Justice Stewart specifically addressed the issue of civil cases, saying, “the First and Fourteenth Amendments clearly give the press and the public a right of access to trials themselves, civil as well as criminal.” Id. at 599.
5 See Westmoreland v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984, cert. denied), Publicker Indus., Inc. v. Cohen, 733 F. 2d 1059 (3d Cir. 1984), Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir. 1983, cert. denied), In re Continental Ill. Secs. Litigation, 732 F.2d 1302, 1308 (7th Cir. 1984), Doe v. Santa Fe Indep. School Dist., 933 F. Supp. 647, 648-50 (S.D. Tex. 1996)
(discussing 3rd, 6th and 7th Circuit decisions and concluding that the right of the public to attend civil trials is grounded in the First Amendment as well as the common law).
With special thanks to the Texas Office of Court Administration
__________
competing rights or interests, such as interests in security, preventing disclosure of non-public information, ensuring a fair trial, or protecting a child from emotional harm.6

Such cases are rare, however, as the presumption of openness adopted by the Supreme Court must be overcome in order to close hearings to the public.7 When a violation occurs, the Supreme Court held that a person whose rights to a public trial are violated do not have to “prove specific prejudice in order to obtain relief” and that the “remedy should be
appropriate to the violation.”8

As recognized by the Waller court, there may be times when a court finds that the rights or interest of privacy of the proceedings outweighs the rights or interests of a public trial. But because the constitutional right at issue belongs to the public rather than the parties, all closures or restrictions of public access to such hearings must satisfy the same heightened standards handed down by the Supreme Court in Waller regarding criminal cases – even when agreed to by the parties. Thus, while the court may consider the parties’ agreement while evaluating a request for closure, that agreement alone is not sufficient to warrant closure. The 1st Amendment right belongs to the public – not to the parties; the parties cannot waive it by agreement.

It is the court’s affirmative burden to ensure meaningful and unfettered access to court proceedings. In fulfilling this burden, the court should take all reasonable measures necessary to ensure public access. Lack of access to a single hearing (suppression), or even a portion of a single hearing (voir dire), may be enough to mandate reversal and a new trial. When the movement of the general public is limited by the executive branch through the governor and various county judges or the access to the courtroom is limited by judicial orders, the public’s right of access may be violated. Shelter-in-place orders and prohibitions on nonessential travel prevent members of the general public from viewing hearings in the courthouse.

Even if a judge is physically in a courtroom for a virtual hearing, it is the court’s burden to ensure public access to each hearing and take reasonable measures to remove barriers thereto.

There is no reasonable access to the public for a hearing, whether remote or physically located in a courthouse, when emergency measures are in place that would limit the public’s access to the courtroom. For the duration of this crisis and while emergency orders are in effect, courts must find a practical and effective way to enable public access to virtual or in-person court proceedings. Choosing not to provide reasonable and meaningful public access to remote court proceedings at this time may equate to constitutional error and mandate reversal.

Under the standards established by the United States Supreme Court, the protective measures employed must be limited to those necessary to protect an overriding interest and no broader. The trial court must consider all reasonable alternatives to closing the proceeding and make findings in open court on the record adequate to support the closure.9

The court must weigh the totality of the circumstances in making these fact specific findings. For this reason, no standing order or global rule for closure of specific categories of hearings may be preemptively issued by a court without running afoul of the requirement to provide the public with access to court proceedings.

The court should not close the entirety of a hearing from public view in order to protect a single witness or topic of testimony. Because the court must apply only the least restrictive measures to protect the overriding interest, only specific portions of a hearing or trial that meet this exacting burden may be conducted outside of the public
______________
6 See Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984).
7 Id.
8 Id.
9 Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48, 104 S. Ct. 2210, 81 L. Ed. 2d 31 (1984)
________________
view, and that only in rare cases. Appellate courts have reversed judgments when a single less-restrictive solution existed but was not considered on the record.10

Courts should strongly consider employing protective measures short of interrupting or terminating a live stream to a virtual hearing. Federal courts, including the Fifth Circuit, have held that a partial closure of a proceeding – limiting access rather than excluding the public – does not raise the same constitutional concerns as a complete closure from public access.11

To employ a less-restrictive measure (for example, temporarily obscuring video but not audio, or not displaying exhibits through screen share,12 providing a phone number for the public to access the audio of the proceeding only, or providing a link that permits certain members of the public only to view the hearing either through YouTube private link or link to the video conferencing platform meeting), the court need only find a “substantial reason” for the limitation and employ a restriction that does not exceed justifiable limits.13

Terminating or interrupting the livestream – even temporarily – would likely constitute a complete closure, and the higher burden would apply.

It bears mentioning that this is not a new issue created by video hearings or public livestreaming. Sensitive and embarrassing testimony is entered in every contested family law hearing yet rarely merits closure or clearing of courtrooms. Child neglect cases categorically involve evidence that is or may be damaging or embarrassing to the child. Commercial disputes commonly involve protected internal corporate operations.

Rarely – if ever – have such trials been closed to the public. Such testimony should not now be evaluated differently simply because more people may exercise their constitutional right to view court proceedings than ever before. Public exercise of a constitutional right does not change the court’s evaluation of whether that right should be protected. Nor should courts erect barriers or hurdles to public attendance at hearings to discourage public exercise of that right. On the contrary, courts are required to take whatever steps are reasonably calculated to accommodate public attendance. Closure of courtrooms is constitutionally suspect and risky and should be a last resort.
_____________________
10 See Cameron v. State, 535 S.W.3d 574, 578 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.)
11 United States v. Osborne, 68 F.3d 94, 98-99 (5th Circ. 1995).
12 The Supreme Court has ruled that the media does not have a First Amendment right to copy exhibits. Nixon v. Warner Communications, 435 U.S. 589 (1978).
13 A.J.S., 442 S.W.3d at 567 (citing Osborne, 68 F.3d at 94, and applying the 6th Amendment Waller and “substantial reason” standards to 14th Amendment public rights)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

25-1-00012-23 Prior bad acts, Records Re: Selena Smith

Selena Smith Assigned Kari Reardon, WA atty
Selena Smith Assigned Kari Reardon, WA atty

The following official records are but a fraction of the history of DV involving Selena Smith (dob: 6-11-76) who has assaulted virtually every person she has resided with since her majority. The records listed here reflect some of the DV associated w/Selena in Thurston County, but do not include many, including the stabbing of her husband while in Germany, the assault on a housemate when residing in Olympia w/Drew (father of Maya), the physical altercation in Hawaii while residing w/Jennifer (her roommate), or the assault on her female roommate while attending adult classes in Seattle. Selena also admitted (see 2018 statement from last document excerpt below) to the unprovoked choking of James Wells (now deceased), the father of her two youngest children. Besides being a serious danger to herself and others, she gloated and taunted her victim while he was losing consciousness with the most vile and hateful speech ever heard. Speaking to the 911 dispatcher, she added “It was worth it,” revealing her immediate awareness what she’d done was wrong and criminal. “I’m going to jail,” she was heard saying to herself before calling 911 after a clumsy attempt to tamper with the evidence of the crime. “Note I called you first,” she told the 911 dispatcher, knowing the police were being summoned. Yet the evidence of the damaged telephone cord and petechial hemorrhaging remaineded. The arresting officer noticed it straight away.

Selena Smith @ 4-7-25 trial readiness hearing on assault (strangulation) charges
Selena Smith @ 4-7-25 trial readiness hearing on assault (strangulation) charges

11/20/19 TCSO DV Rpt (View Document)

11/15/20 TCSO DV Rpt (View Document)

7/17/21 TCSO DV & Burg Hans Declaration (View Report)

7/17/21 TCSO DV & Burg Kathryn Declaration (View Document)

7/17/21 TCSO DV & Burg Rpt (View Document)

7/17/21 TCSO DV & Burg Supplemental Rpt (View Document)

Selena Smith on 4-7-25 hearing re: new defense atty Kari Reardon
Selena Smith on 4-7-25 hearing re: new defense atty Kari Reardon

Thurston Clerk’s Notes & BW in Felony case#:21-1-00676-34 (State v. Selena Smith)
(View Document)

6/10/22 Selena Letter to Prosecutor Jon Tunheim Re: Thurston case #:21-1-00676-34
–>(View Document)<– Selena justifies stabbing her husband, Charles Morris, while failing to mention her assault on her mother [Kat], her mother’s husband [Hans], various roommates over the years, failure to protect Hazel Smith (her young autistic child) from assault & hospitalization in Colorado, and even her treatment of Maya (her oldest daughter) when the baby was still in diapers while in Alaska. She also fails to mention leaving Maya alone on the streets [Java Flow] of Olympia to garner Drew’s attention [Maya’s father, since deceased], then (years later) abandoning Onawa in California to manipulate James Wells’ attention [Onawa’s father, since deceased]. All of the father’s of Selena’s children have come to a bad end or died unnatural deaths except for Robert Ayer (Maya’s fugitive father). She has assaulted both of her parents and her step-father (Hans, since deceased)–very nearly murdering her own dad by strangulation on 1-8-25. Her life story is replete with the Perils of Penelope, hog tying by drug cartels, interstate flight to evade her pursuers and prosecution, jumping bail in Thurston case #:21-1-00676-34, stealing a leased van in Portland to flee to Slab City, California, then selling the stolen vehicle after arrival before fleeing to Washington, D.C. whre she lived on the streets for years while working under the table for an alternative newspaper and selling marijuanna contrary to federal law in a federal enclave. Selena is no longer merely a scofflaw, but a violent deranged outlaw. She no longer has any support network or reliable friends after alienating them all. In her eyes, charity is offered by suckers. She has bitten every hand that’s fed her, used her children as a vehicle for charity and her support, exploited her own kin cynically and piteously. Frankly, Selena is the quintessential bawling cow with tears streaming down its face because it is standing on its own teat.

Selena Smith on 4-7-25 re: 60 day continuance of trial for assault (strangulation) of father
Selena Smith on 4-7-25 re: 60 day continuance of trial for assault (strangulation) of father

21.9.7 TCSO DV Rpt (View Document)

21.9.7 TCSO James Wells RP (View Document)

21.9.7 TCSO Hans Stoker RP (View Document)

20.5.1 TCSO Selena Contact (View Document)

20.5.2 TCSO James Wells RP (View Document)

20.6.7 TCSO DV Rpt (View Document)

20.6.7 TCSO Gun Theft Rpt (View Document)

20.6.12 TCSO CPS Inquiry (View Document)

20.8.7 TCSO DV Selena RP (View Document)

20.11.11 TCSO DV James RP (View Document)

20.11.15 TCSO DV Hans RP (View Document)

20.11.21 TCSO DV Selena RP (View Document)

20.12.6 TCSO DVPO Kathryn RP (View Document)

20.12.10 TCSO DVSO Query Selena RP (View Document)

20.12.13 TCSO DVPO Gun Selena RP (View Document)

21.4.21 TCSO Welfare Chk NJ Sec Grd Robert Kurtz RP (View Document)

21.4.21 TCSO Followup Hans RP falsely claiming Selena’s children as his grandchildren
(View Document)

21.7.12 TCSO Rpt impersonation by Kurtz – John Smith RP (View Document)

21.7.14 TCSO Rpt Jim’s Inv Priv – John Smith RP (View Document)

21.7.14 TCSO Rpt John Smith RP (View Document)

21.7.14 TCSO Cmpnt John Smith RP (View Document)

21,7,17 TCSO Burglary Kat Stoker RP (View Document)

(Page 6/49 California psychiatric hospital assessment)
Episode 1: (1124) CRISIS STABILIZATION UNIT-ALL AGE 10/12/2018 – 10/13/2018
Client: Selena Smith (000078296)
Submitted 10/14/2018 at 07:17 PM by AMANDA BURNFIN
1201 Crisis Assessment
Assessment Date: 10/13/2018
Assessment Time: 08:03 AM
Staff /Practitioner completing form: BURNFIN,AMANDA (011541)
Legal Status: 5150, VOL
Current Psychiatric Symptoms and Behavior (including onset and course of symptoms in
support of DSM diagnosis):

The client is a 42 year old female who self-presented due to anxiety/paranoia and
she was placed on a 5150 GD hold. The client presented with paranoia,
disorganized thought process, and irritable in affect. The client reported she had
driven up and down California and to Idaho from her residence in Olympia, WA
with her young 5/6 rronth old daughter Onawa. The client presents disheveled in
appearance, has long dark blonde dreads, is 61 3″ in height, and was highly
anxious to irritable in affect during interview. The client’s blood pressure slightly
elevated, appeared highly anxious “can you call my family to tell them I have high
blood pressure? … You will take me to the hospital if I need to go right?” The client
stated belief that her partner and friends may have taken off with her baby,
since “Sky” had not returned her call this rrorning. The client yelled at her rrother
on the phone at one point, demanding she find out rrore details on the baby. The
client struggled to describe linear sequence of events leading to her admission
and became highly irritable when psychiatrist or staff asked questions for
clarification.

Per client’s mother, client has history of schizophrenia, worsening symptoms
recently. The client, client’s partner, and client’s 5/6 rronth old had been living in
the mother’s guest house in Olympia, WA.

Per client’s partner, ‘Toke,” [James Wells, since deceased] the partner had left the client on September 20th,2018 after the client [Selena] had become physically assaultive towards the partner [James].
(partner said client “tackled” him while he had the baby; client [Selena] said she “choked”
partner while he had the baby so she can get the baby). The partner [James] went to
stay with a friend “up in the rrountains. The partner [James] said he got a call from his
friend [Skye] in Humboldt County on 10/11/2018 that the client had dropped off the 5/6
rronth old daughter with friend [Skye] and reported she had seemed to not intend to
return. The partner [James] drove to Eureka to collect his 5/6 rronth old daughter. The
client [Selena] attempted to collect the daughter the next day.

The client [Selena] was admitted to SV for further evaluation and stabilization.
Daniel “Sky”, friend, 707-601-4312

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

1-8-25 fugitive Selena Smith strangles elderly parent

Case Information

25-1-00012-23 | STATE OF WASHINGTON vs SMITH, SELENA URSA

Click –> Faustian Bargains: Dancing w/the Devil

Case Number
25-1-00012-23

Court
Mason

File Date
01/09/2025

Case Type
PRE Pre Filing – Adult

Case Status
Active

Party

Plaintiff (Criminal)
STATE OF WASHINGTON

Active Attorneys
Lead Attorney
Bickerton, Tyler Craig


Defendant (WIP)
SMITH, SELENA URSA

Active Attorneys
Lead Attorney
Reardon, Kari Leigh
Court Appointed

DOB
6/11/1976

  • Verified Name Match Selena Ursa Smith OLYMPIA, WA
  • 48
    • Olympia, WA
    • Lacey, WA
    • Portland, OR
    • Nunn, CO
    • Denver, CO
    • Lafayette, CO
    • Las Vegas, NV
    • Riverside, CA
    • San Diego, CA
    • Centralia, WA
    • Apo, AE
    • Jber, AK
    • Charles Morris
    • Kathryn Stoker
    • Hans Stoker
    • Maya Stoker
    • Chad Stoker

Charge

Charges
SMITH, SELENA URSA

  DescriptionStatuteLevelDate
1Non-ChargeNONNon Charge01/08/2025
Selena Smith @ 4-7-25 trial readiness hearing on assault (strangulation) charges
Selena Smith @ 4-7-25 trial readiness hearing on assault (strangulation) charges
Selena Smith
Selena Smith

Events and Hearings

It’s Money that they Love Blues <–$!, it’s a Hit.

Kari Leigh Reardon, defense atty
Kari Leigh Reardon, defense atty
John David Visser, PI (63yo)
John David Visser, PI (63yo)
Phone #’s: (509) 881-1425‬, ‭(360) 910-1190‬, (678) 788-6022‬, ‭(360) 773-2334‬, ‭(360) 574-8394‬, ‭(360) 844-6180‬
E-mails: getthetruth@comcast.com, getthetruth@comcast.ne, jdvisser@comcast.net, john@investigativesolutions.us
Decertification #:05-119 Visser, John D. Clark Co. SO Failure of Duty
Investigative Solutions LLC, Vancouver, WA/Portland, OR

Decertified Officer Number: 27817
Decertified: 2007
Agency: Clark County Sheriff
State: Washington
Occupation: Deputy Sheriff
Average Salary: $45,000 per year
Salary Range: $32,000 (rookies) to $75,000 (sheriffs).

The Columbian (newspaper), Vancouver, WA

January 12, 2006; Page c1
Section: Clark County/region
Article ID: 2006012059 — 306 words

The Clark County Deputy Sheriffs Guild on Wednesday filed a grievance in the Dec. 15 firing of former Deputy John Visser.

This is the first formal step in the guild’s effort to get Visser reinstated as a deputy. Visser, 43, a deputy since 1991, was fired for attending a party where teenagers were drinking, and for drinking beer himself during the gathering.

Sheriff’s officials say Visser knew the minors were drinking and did nothing to stop it. Visser also failed

Deputy, 43, fired over teen party
Article 4 of 50 found

January 4, 2006; Page a1
Section: Crime
Article ID: 2006004037 — 939 words

A longtime Clark County Sheriff’s Office detective has been fired for attending a party where people younger than 21 years old were drinking, and for drinking beer himself at the gathering a year ago.

But former Deputy John Visser, 43, says he was wrongfully terminated. Visser, a deputy since 1991, said he went to the gathering in hopes of learning the identity of two people who were selling the illegal drug Ecstasy and to help a 19-year-old family friend who had become involved
Posted by: Thomas | Friday, January 27, 2006 at 07:34 AM

Case Notes

  • 01/09/2025 Preliminary Appearance Original Type
    Preliminary Appearance Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    1:15 PM Result
    Held Comment (ZOOM ID:907 729 4239)
    (Judge Cobb recused himself from any further hearings in the instant case)
    1:15 Parties Present Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA
  • 01/09/2025 Affidavit of Probable Cause
  • Booking #: 25-0025 Name: SMITH, SELENA U Name Number: 302216
  • Book Date: 14:30:00 01/08/25
  • Rel Date: No Rel Date
  • Statute Offense Court Offense Class
  • 9A.36.021.2.DV Domestic Violence SUPR DOMV FB
  • 9A.40.040 Kidnapping, Abduction SUPR KIDN FC
  • 9A.36.150 Domestic Violence
Self Pity
Self Pity
Selena Arrested

(During Selena’s arrest, Deputies were seen counting a large sum of cash found in her backpack.)

Charles Anthony Morris (Selena’s X) shared photo of his wife’s tender embrace w/family.

Charles Morris letter to family (View Document)

James Wells Recording Selena Smith in DV enviornment (Listen to Audio)

Maya Smith/(Stoker) Declaration excoriating Selena (her mom) for DV filed in Thurston County Family Court in case #:21-4-00443-34 (Emergency Guardianship Petition)
View Document — Maya is Selena’s oldest child & daughter of independent means due to the death of her father (Drew) amd changing her name to Stoker to ingratiate herself w/her multi-millionaire maternal grandmother and Stoker clan…quite successfully it might be added given the wording in the Last Will of Hans Stoker. Ironically, Maya is silent about the heated arguments her grandmother had w/Hans. That would have chilled the financial ardor of her benefactors, cheapening her newly adopted “brand”.

25.1.8 Selena’s call to 911 trivializing and justifying her vicious assault, ripping the phone out of the wall while ordreing me not to call the police before pushing me over backwards in my wheel chair (keenly aware of my fragile health in detail) and struggling with me for about 8 minutes to wrest my cell phone from my hands. I asked her repeatedly tp get pff of me and let me get up, but she refused unless I promised not to call the police. Then she renewed her effort to wrest my cell phone from me, saying she’d let me up if I gave it to her, finally choking me nearly into unconciousness while gloating and taunting me with her imagined grievances. Nobody called her a ‘bitch’ or ‘abused’ her in any way. On the contrary, she was being counseled on the futility of remaining a fugitive if she ever wanted to see her children. She lied about injuring me. The responding deputy observed my eyes were bleeding from being choked and I could not see clearly through the blood in my eyes the resulted from the hemmorhaging. Everytime Selena has assaulted another person, she inevitably tried to justify it and/or trivialize it. I’m lucky to be alive. Selen admits to the 911 operator she got off on trying to squeeze the life out of me when she strangled me. Her actions may not have been premeditated for longer than the time it took her, but her actions were very deliberate and satisfying to her according to Selena. She’s looking at a felony trial (burglary) for the DV incident where she entered her mother’s home in 2021 (July) before kicking her when Deputies tried to separate Selena from her small children. Selena’s mom had acquired legal custody of them after a contentious and unfair Guardianship proceeding w/o representation or a right to a jury trial. What’s apparent here is Selena trying to lie her way out of yet another predicament she caused. Selena is fulll of hate towards virtually everyone, perhaps even herself. My near death experience at her hands combined with her brazen violence and self gratulatory attitude for it demins the maximum penalty the law provides for–10 years minimum would be a good start. Patricidal Orphans have lost their humanity. This 48yo misanthropic patricidal maniac gloated and congratulated herself for letting me live while I struggled for almost three minutes to recover enough strength to get upright off the floor. She trivialized & made light of it to the 911 call center. No, I’m NOT “fine” & will never be after this. I lost a daughter–her children a mother. The responding Deputy could see from my bleeding eyes I was not “fine” as did the medics. Selena lied, denied she’d choked me. The most common cause of death in DV altercations is strangulation. That she couldn’t think of my birth date or name speaks volumes.

CLICK HERE to hear the audio of a remorseless orphan feeling sorry for herself.

Prior Paternal good deeds did not go unpunished. What’s the Biblical quote about casting pearls? The Stokers?–Selena was right about them…in spades. But, they were also right about her. Though she bridles at the allegation of being an unfit mother, She claims she couldn’t escape from the clingy violent perennial homeless psychotic (Robby) accompanying her in her van as she drove to Olympia from Portland to retrieve her children, adding them to the mix of Portland rapists, thugs, and Robby she argued she couldn’t escape that watershed Saturday in July, 2021. She did nothing to intervene when her ratso BF (James Wells, father of her 2 youngest) invited one of his heroin addicted friends to dry out for days under the same roof w/her children. The guy puked all over the bedroom and James left the slimy stench for Selen to clean up, Selena’s children to witness. Maya describes mounds of mouse shit on every shelf and surface. Selena’s common sense and judgment was non-existent, leaving her children in the care/company of violent psychotic strange men who she said they and their gangs held her against her will, sexually abused her, passed her around like a whore, and forced her to trade sex for drugs. This mother’s lack of a true moral compass or sense of direction can be measured in presuming she could protect them when she could not protect herself. The truth is much closer to Kathryn’s (Selena’s mother) observation Selena used her children to support herself on the public’s dime. When Selena’s children were illegally seized w/o due process in Oregon, Selena’s world fell apart, she found a Portland job in a desperate bid to recover her kids before felony FTA for trial, jumping bail, heisting the RV van she’d leased, and fleeing to Slab City, California (The most lawless enclave in America) before being set upon by some locals she’d sold her stolen can to without warning them. They hogties her (according to Selena) not out of predatory instincts to sell into Mexican white slavery, but to teach Selena some manners. One must be very honest to live outside the law. Selena failed that litmus test. The lesson was harsh. Life on the streets of Washington D.C. seemed tame by comparison.

Selena’s Portland benefactors were shocked by the barbarity of the Stokers’ violation of my daughter’s (and her children’s) Civil Rights and Due Process–calling them monsters. As the truth crystalized, it turned out Selena had been the most pernicious monster all along. Where the Stokers piteously cut Selena’s children from half of their family, Selena was dead set on cutting them off from all of her family, repeatedly declaring to all who would listen she hated them all. Selena cast herself as the antagonist in her own rendition of The Last Picture Show.

Collect/funded calls from Selena @ (866)516-0115 jailhouse payphone after arrest for DV and Burglary in the wake of visiting her mother’s (Kathryn Stoker) residence:
7-20-21 9:09am 4m57s
7-20-21 9:18am 4m53s
7-20-21 9:25am 8m15s
7-20-21 9:43am 19m59s
7-20-21 10:06am 19m36s
7-20-21 10:27am 19m54s
7-20-21 10:49am 15m07s
7-21-21 2:25am 16m46s


Deja vu all over again

Case Information

25-1-00012-23 | STATE OF WASHINGTON vs SMITH, SELENA URSA

Case Number
25-1-00012-23
Deputy’s Report #: 25-00391

Court
Mason

File Date
01/09/2025

Case Type
PRE Pre Filing – Adult

Case Status
Active

Party

Plaintiff (Criminal)
STATE OF WASHINGTON


Defendant (WIP)
SMITH, SELENA URSA

DOB
6/11/1976

Active Attorneys
TYLER Craig BICKERTON, 47990
Mason Co. Deputy—Prosecuting Attorney
Address: PO Box 639, Shelton, WA 98584-0639
Phone: (360) 427-9670 EXT 417
E-Mail: tbickerton@masoncountywa.gov
Admit Date:2014-10-20

Nicole S. Helser
Mason County Prosecutor’s Office – Administrative Secretary
Civil & District Court Division
P.O. Box 639
521 N. 4th Street
Shelton, WA 98584
(360) 427-9670 ext. 394
(360) 427-7754 Fax
NicoleH@masoncountywa.gov

Lead Attorney
Hack, Karl Alan (withdrew)/DALE BRAUNGER(relieved)
Active Attorneys
Lead Attorney
Reardon, Kari Leigh
Court Appointed

Public Defender


Charge

Charges
SMITH, SELENA URSA

  DescriptionStatuteLevelDate
1Non-ChargeNONNon Charge01/08/2025

Events and Hearings

  • 01/09/2025 Preliminary Appearance Original Type
    Preliminary AppearanceJudicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    1:15 PM Result
    Held Comment
    1:15P Parties PresentDefendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA
  • 1 01/09/2025 Affidavit of Probable Cause View Document Affidavit of Probable Cause
    (In the above PC affidavit, the arresting officer notes blood in the victim’s right eye, the kind of orbital hemorraging consistent w/strangulation. Selena’s denying and lying about her strangling the victim to a law enforcement official is a separate crime.

    She could have lawfully remained silent, but attempted to evade accountability by lying–a consistent pattern in her life reminiscent of the same pattern in her mother’s life–ultimately giving rise to the instant case and reflecting her obvious lack of remorse or accepting responsibility for her actions.

    Selena’s denial flies in the face of the officer’s observation along with the paramedics’ documentation, called to the scene of the crime. The victim experienced and relayed information to the paramedics his vision was blurred in both eyes from the blood in them. The victim knows this fact from personal experience.

    Selena’s sentence should be enhanced due to her deliberate lying when, in fact, she was verbally gloating and taunting her victim while strangling him. The fact she has but one good hand does not consider her strength, and the victim’s weakened elderly condition–the extent of his medical condition and infirmities well known to her.

    Additionally, there was an active struggle over the victim’s cell phone giving rise to her strangling him while claiming she would release him if he turned over his cell phone to her and promised not to call the police. The victim refused.

    Selena’s taunts were abusive and vile beyond imagination. She gloated at how he deserved to die. When she finally did release him, she pronounced she was more virtuous and better than him as reason for letting him live. In his shocked weakened state, it took him about 3 minutes to recover sufficiently to get off the floor and flee from his home. Selena followed him up the driveway.

    Selena commented at her Hearing the jail was comfortable, the food good along with the company she had. The bail amount was paltry–$5,000–considering the severity of the crime–deliberate attempted murder, if not premeditated.

    Selena is a woman who stabbed her husband with a butcher knife while in Germany, but suffered no consequences for it. The deja vu simply increases in severity and magnitude with time. This woman will end up dead or killing someone. She is a menace to herself and others, including her own family and children. She is hopelessly out of control.)
  • 01/09/2025 JIS Check Confidential Document Cover Sheet
  • 01/09/2025 Findings of Indigency
  • 2 01/09/2025 Order Appointing Attorney View Document Order Appointing Attorney Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Comment
    KARL HACK (recused)
  • 3 01/09/2025 Transmittal on Copy of Order View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order Comment
    ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY
  • 4 01/09/2025 Order for Pretrial Release View Document Order for Pretrial ReleaseJ udicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 5 01/09/2025 Transmittal on Copy of Order View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order Comment
    ORDER FOR PRETRIAL RELEASE
  • 6 01/09/2025 No Contact Order View Document No Contact Order Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 7 01/09/2025 Transmittal on Copy of Order View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order Comment
    NO CONTACT ORDER
  • 01/13/2025 Filing of Charges Info 
  • 8 View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order
  • Comment Judge Tirsa Butler assigned
  • NO CONTACT ORDER
  • SUPERIOR COURT DOCKETS – ZOOM MEETING ID (SUBJECT TO CHANGE)
    (View Document)
  • Criminal dockets and hearings – Defendants and Counsel appear in person unless otherwise authorized
  • Criminal docket (Monday) ZOOM ID:907 729 4239
  • Show Cause docket (Tuesday) ZOOM ID:907 729 4239
  • Special set cases (Wednesday, Thursday, Friday)
  • ID hearings (as needed / daily)
  • 8a 01/13/2025 Information View Document Information
  • 9 01/13/2025 Transmittal on Copy of Order View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order Comment
    INFORMATION
  • 10 01/14/2025 Order Appointing Attorney View Document Order Appointing Attorney Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Comment
    WITHDRAW: KARL HACK APPOINT: DALE BRAUNGER
  • 11 01/14/2025 Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery View Document Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery Comment
    AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE / DALE BRAUNGER
  • 01/21/2025 Initial Arraignment 
  • Original Type
  • Initial Arraignment
  • Judicial Officer
  • Cobb, Monty D
  • Hearing Time
  • 9:00 AM
  • Result
  • Held
  • Comment
  • 9A
  • Parties Present
  • Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON
  • Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig
  • Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA
  • Attorney: Braunger, Dale Francis
  • 12 01/21/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 13 01/21/2025 Transmittal on Copy of Order View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order Comment
    ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE
  • 02/10/2025 Omnibus Original Type
    Omnibus Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A
    Parties PresentPlaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSAAttorney: Braunger, Dale Francis
  • 14 02/10/2025 Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney View Document Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney
  • 15 02/10/2025 Omnibus Order View Document Omnibus OrderJudicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 02/24/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management HearingJudicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A
  • 03/11/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 03/11/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A

    16 03/27/2025 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on Subpoena Comment
    $109.60
  • 03/31/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    With Judge Stevens at 11:30 a.m Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA
  • 17 03/31/2025 Order to Appear for Pretrial Hrg Conf View Document Order to Appear for Pretrial Hrg Conf Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David
  • 03/31/2025 Order Appointing Attorney Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Comment
    OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE
  • 18 03/31/2025 Motion Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Comment
    CONTINUANCE
  • 19 04/03/2025 Notice Withdraw and Substitution of Counsel View Document Notice Withdraw and Substitution of Counsel
  • 04/07/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A / ATTY STATUS Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA
  • 20 04/07/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer Stevens, David
  • 21 04/08/2025 Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery View Document Notice of Appearance and Request for Discovery Comment
    KARI REARDON
  • 22 04/09/2025 Order Setting Review Hearing View Document Order Setting Review Hearing Judicial Officer Stevens, David
  • 23 04/09/2025 Order for Competency Evaluation View Document Order for Competency Evaluation Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David
  • 24 04/09/2025 Transmittal on Copy of Order View Document Transmittal on Copy of Order Comment
    CONFIRMATION OF EMAIL SENT
  • 04/15/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance Comment
    9A
  • 04/15/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance Comment
    9A
  • 25 04/23/2025 Request View Document Request Comment
    DSHS – FOR GOOD CAUSE EXTENSION FOR DELAY OF IN-JAIL EVALUATION
  • 26 04/23/2025 Order View Document Order Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Comment
    FOR GOOD CAUSE EXTENSION
  • 26A 04/28/2025 Omnibus Original Type
    Omnibus Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result VIEW DOCUMENT
    Stricken Comment
    9A Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig
  • 04/28/2025 Order Setting Review Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 27 04/28/2025 Order Setting Review Hearing View Document Order Setting Review Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 28 04/29/2025 Review Hearing Original Type
    Review Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Stricken Comment
    9A / WSH
  • 29 04/29/2025 Hearing Stricken In Court Other Reason View Document Mason Minutes
  • 30 04/29/2025 Sealed Personal Health Care Records Cover Sheet View Document Sealed Personal Health Care Records Cover Sheet Comment
    RECOMMENDED SERVICE PLAN
  • 05/05/2025 Sealed Confidential Reports Cover Sheet
  • 31 05/06/2025 Review Hearing Original Type VIEW DOCUMENT
    Review Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A / 10.77
  • 05/06/2025 Review Hearing
    Parties Present
    Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON
    Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig
    Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA
  • 32 05/06/2025 Order Determining Competency to Stand Trial VIEW DOCUMENT
    Judicial Officer Stevens, David
  • 33 05/08/2025 Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer VIEW DOCUMENT
    Stevens, David
  • 05/12/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 05/27/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 05/27/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 34 05/27/2025 Omnibus Judicial Officer VIEW DOCUMENT
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment (Continued)
    9A
  • 06/09/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing 
    Judicial Officer Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 06/09/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance Comment
    9A
  • 06/16/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 06/24/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 06/24/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 07/01/2025 Pretrial/Omnibus Original Type
    Pretrial/Omnibus Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A Parties PresentPlaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTONDeputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 07/01/2025 Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 35 07/01/2025 Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney View Document Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney
  • 07/08/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTONDeputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 36 07/08/2025 Order to Appear for Pretrial Hrg Conf View Document Order to Appear for Pretrial Hrg ConfJudicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 37 07/08/2025 Omnibus Order View Document Omnibus Order Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 38 07/14/2025 Request View Document Request Comment
    FOR RESTITUTION – JOHN SMITH
  • 07/15/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 07/15/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 39 07/15/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 40 07/15/2025 PreTrial Management Hearing View Document Mason Minutes
  • 41 07/15/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 07/22/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 07/22/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 42 08/06/2025 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on Subpoena
    Comment
    $130.00
  • 43 08/18/2025 Motion View Document Motion Comment
    FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
  • 44 08/19/2025 Trial Confirmation Original Type
    Trial Confirmation View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A Parties PresentPlaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 08/19/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 45 08/19/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 46 08/19/2025 Review Hearing View Document Mason Minutes
  • 47 08/20/2025 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on Subpoena Comment
    $125.40
  • 48 08/25/2025 Order Expending Public Funds View Document Order Expending Public Funds Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Comment
    $1500 – PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR JOHN VISSER
  • 49 08/28/2025 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on Subpoena Comment
    $120
  • 09/09/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 09/09/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM
  • 50 09/09/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 51 09/09/2025 Order View Document Order Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Comment
    RE: EXCLUDED PERIOD 9-9-25 TO 9-21-25
  • 52 09/12/2025 Bail Bond View Document Bail Bond Comment
    ALADDIN BAIL BONDS
  • 53 09/19/2025 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on Subpoena Comment
    $55
  • 54 09/23/2025 Trial Confirmation Original Type
    Trial Confirmation View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9AParties PresentPlaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTONDeputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler CraigDefendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSAAttorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 09/23/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM
  • 55 09/23/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 56 09/23/2025 Review Hearing View Document Mason Minutes
  • 11/18/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 11/18/2025 Review Hearing Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A – STATUS
  • 57 11/18/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C
  • 58 11/25/2025 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on Subpoena Comment
    $73.20
  • 12/02/2025 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance Comment
    9A
  • 12/02/2025 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance
  • 12/16/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Butler, Tirsa C Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Comment
    9A
  • 59 12/16/2025 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 60 12/16/2025 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D
  • 61 12/16/2025 Motion Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Cobb, Monty D Comment
    CONTINUANCE
  • 01/13/2026 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance Comment
    9A
  • 01/13/2026 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance Comment
    9A
  • 01/20/2026 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 62 01/20/2026 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial Date Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David
  • 02/17/2026 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    ContinuanceComment
    9A
  • 02/17/2026 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Continuance
  • 63 03/09/2026 Return on Subpoena View Document Return on SubpoenaComment
    $128.72
  • 64 03/10/2026 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Original Type
    Pre-Trial Management Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    Held Comment
    9A
  • 65 03/10/2026 Order Setting Review Hearing View Document Order Setting Review Hearing Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David
  • 66 03/10/2026 Review Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Comment
    FTA
  • 67 03/17/2026 Review Hearing Original Type
    Review Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Result
    HeldComment
    9A – FTA Parties Present Plaintiff (Criminal): STATE OF WASHINGTON Deputy Prosecuting Attorney: Bickerton, Tyler Craig Defendant (WIP): SMITH, SELENA URSA Attorney: Reardon, Kari Leigh
  • 68 03/17/2026 Order Setting Trial Date View Document Order Setting Trial DateJudicial Officer
    Stevens, DavidComment
    TRIAL SET ON A MONDAY AND NEEDS TO BE RE-SET
  • 69 03/17/2026 Motion Hearing View Document Mason Minutes Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Comment
    CONTINUANCE
  • 03/24/2026 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Stevens, DavidH earing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 03/24/2026 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Stevens, David Hearing Time
    9:00 AM Cancel Reason
    Stricken Comment
    9A
  • 05/05/2026 Pre-Trial Management Hearing Judicial Officer
    Stevens, DavidHearing Time
    9:00 AMComment
    9A – TRIAL SET ON A MONDAY AND NEEDS TO BE RE-SET
  • 05/18/2026 Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer
    Stevens, DavidHearing Time
    9:00 AMComment
    9A
  • 05/18/2026 Jury Trial-12 Judicial Officer
    Stevens, DavidHearing Time
    9:00 AM
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

7-22-24 Yet Another Police Murder: Sonya Massey

VIEW Body Camera video of Sonya’s brutal execution by cop.

Sonya Massey ducked and apologized to an Illinois sheriff’s deputy only seconds before he shot her three times in her home, with one fatal bullet to the head, as seen in body camera video released Monday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment