![](https://i2.wp.com/amicuscuria.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PillowTalk.gif?resize=640%2C480)
The point is our 1st Amendment rights would appear to be moot in this faux ‘private’ sector. Trump has already sounded the alarm on a similar. note due to Twitter censorship. The PruneYard decision desperately needs to be expanded. PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that California could interpret its state constitution to protect political protesters from being evicted from private property, held open to the public, without running afoul of the Fifth Amendment.